Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[The Observer]

Pirate,

I agree with most of what you are saying.

But when things are more about
                                                Who Did?
                                              as opposed to
                                                What Did?

                           You know the reptilian brain has kicked in.

Gadgetmall's one and only wish is that his work is utilized in a grand manner.
I doubt credit for it means little to him at this point.

Having said that...
                         Thanks for your work Gadget... you are brilliant.

Best Regards,
                    The Observer

[ltseung888]

Adding tribute to the Internet Forum Members

Prepared Opening Speech at the Hong Kong University Workshop on Oct 9

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

As you all know, this will be the last workshop run by me in Hong Kong.……

The Seventh Group is the many persons on the Internet.  This group is special because I never met them face-to-face.  Most of them are known only by their usernames.  The one that has most influence on the demonstration today is gadgetmail who got cancel and had to withdraw his submission to the overunity prize and stopped his research.  As stated many times, I shall send a FLEET prototype to Stefan, the administrator of the overunity.com forum after the university verifications.  The prize money will go to gadgetmail.  Some helpful internet forum members include Observer, Hope, Pirate88179, Jeanna, Magluvin, Paul-R, FatBird, gyulasun and many more.  They are willing to share the result of their research and provided much timely comments.  I might have missed many other helpful forum members as the two threads now contained thousands of posts.


……
The last groups are my family members and personal friends.  They provided both financial and emotional support over the years.  Without their support, the lead-out energy theory and the working prototypes would not have been born.

***** The Technical presentation will follow.

[ltseung888]

Technical Session I for the Workshop at HKU on Oct 9, 2010

Lead-out Energy Theory

When we do experiments on overunity, there will be scientists ready to jump in with the statement â€" “Perpetual motion machines are theoretically impossible.  It violates the Law of Conservation of Energy.  Do not waste your time and our time.”

The above is a correct statement both theoretically and practically.  Energy cannot be created nor destroyed.  It can only change from one form to another.  However, we can always lead-out or bring-in energy from the surrounding.  If we can do that, we have not violated the Law of Conservation of Energy.  For example, when scientists did not know solar cells centuries ago, they did not know how to use sunlight directly even if they were exposed to bright sunlight.  They might have a sense that sunlight was a form of energy because it could keep a person warm.

Most of the present day scientist knows that there is gravitational energy.  Every object attracts every other object.  This is an attraction force.  When an object moves, it will move closer to some objects and further away to some other objects in its surrounding.  Work is done when there is a force and a displacement. In other words, when we move, we are exchanging gravitational energy with our surrounding all the time.  This is a scientific fact and is accepted by all well-informed scientists and physicists.

Scientists also know how to use gravitational energy in a one-shot mode.  For example, water can flow out from a dam to turn turbines to generate electricity.  However, the water has to be evaporated by the sun and come down as rain to fill up the dam again.

The big question is â€" can gravitational energy be used continuously?  Can we continuously lead-out or bring-in gravitational energy similar to wind or solar energy?  The YES answer has not been taught in schools and universities yet.  The simplest example is a horizontally pulse-pulled pendulum.  When we pull a pendulum horizontally, the pendulum bob will rise.  Vertical work has been done.  Previously, most scientists assumed that the pendulum could be considered as a simple machine and converted the horizontally supplied energy to vertical energy.

However, there is another possible and most likely the correct explanation.  Gravitational or vertical energy was led-out or brought into the system.  So long as there is tension in the string, gravitational energy will be brought into the pendulum system.  The following mathematical analysis proves the above statements.  The conclusion is that for small angles, 2 parts of horizontally supplied energy can lead-out approximately 1 part of vertical, gravitational energy.  In other words, 3 parts of energy goes into the pendulum system.  The Coefficient of Performance (COP) which is the ratio of Output Energy over Input Energy is equal to 1.5 (3/2).

This is a very significant amount of lead-out energy.  Toy manufacturers already used it for years in the solar or battery powered swinging toy.  Mr. Lee Cheung Kin was the first one to realize it in Dec 2004.  He and I were given the video of a car produced by Dr. Liang Sing Yan of China.  That car did not need any fuel to run and could recharge its own starting battery.  Dr. Liang was accused of fraud because he could not explain the source of energy of his car.  His car was impounded by the Police.  That car used pulsed rotation to lead-out gravitational energy.  When the Government experts took apart and reassembled the car, it failed to work. 

Mr. Lee Cheung Kin and I worked out the mathematics and realized that the Liang car was not a hoax.  When we searched the Internet, we found many other claimed overunity devices.  They could be explained by the lead-out energy theory.  We now have a few HK$20 FLEET devices that can demonstrate overunity built by the participants in this workshop today.  These overunity devices will be further confirmed and verified by the top academic institutions in Hong Kong, China, USA and other Countries.

*** The presentation slides on Lead-out Energy theory will then be presented.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited.

[ltseung888]

Technical Session II for the Workshop at HKU on Oct 9, 2010

The FLEET devices

FLEET stands for Forever Lead-out Electromagnetic Energy Transformer.  We discussed how gravitational energy could be lead-out in our first session.  We now focus on how we can lead-out magnetic, electric or electromagnetic energy.

We shall start with the very simple Forever Yuen Experiment.  We replace the pendulum bob with a magnet and put the system in a magnetic field produced by two powerful magnets above and below the bob.  The period of oscillation will change.  If we can lead-out gravitational energy, we can lead-out or bring-in magnetic energy in a similar fashion.  Magnetic field is even better.  We can control its strength and direction.  We can turn it on and off.

Thus in our PCT patent application, we stated that we could lead-out magnetic energy via pulsing to oscillating, vibrating, rotating or flux change systems.  Magnetic field can be thought of as produced by electrons rotating around the nucleus.  Leading-out magnetic energy is equivalent to leading-out electron motion energy.  (The well-known chemical energies are changes in the electron clouds around elements or compounds.  They can be regarded as another form of electron motion energy.) 

We are not only exchanging gravitational energy with the surrounding all the time.  We are also constantly exchanging electron motion energy with our surroundings.  There are trillions of electrons surrounding us.  The lead-out energy machines orientate them in such a way that some of their energy flows into our system.  Some of the energy will be replenished by the electrons closer to them  Thus many lead-out energy machines run cold instead of hot.  This is a powerful solution to our global warming problem.

Initially, Lee Cheung Kin and I thought that we could just promote the invention of an existing inventor and we would have working, demonstration prototypes.  That turned out to be wishful thinking.  Some inventors refused to meet us.  Some inventors received funding from investors who wanted all development work confidential.  Some inventors are associated with the Government and cannot disclose their work.  Lee Cheung Kin was “recruited” by the Chinese military and he disappeared from the scene.

The first successful overunity prototype was the Tong Wheel produced by Mr. Tong Po Chi.  That prototype used pulsed rotation with stator coils that can be configured either as either drive coils or collector coils.  These pulsed coils interact with permanent magnets on a rotating wheel.  The rate of rotation was governed by a proximity switch.  We achieved overunity in summer 2009 with COP = 3 and actual output power of less than 5 watts.

Rasa, a medical doctor working with a group in China came to visit.  He wanted to place orders for three wheels.  He casually asked whether the size can be reduced so that he could put it in a suitcase.  The answer was that with rotational systems like the Tong Wheel, that was impossible.  We might have to research into motionless, flux change systems.   That was the start of FLEET in the early months of 2010.

You can follow the development of FLEET via the thread in overunity.com titled “Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets”.  The research quickly evolved to lead-out energy resonance hunting systems with pulsing source and LCR tuning circuits.  We were influenced by the work of the late Stanley Mayer, the Steven Mark TPU and the gadgetmail heater.

The prototypes you are seeing today will be shown in UC Irvine next month.  The presentation and demonstration will be coordinated by an US Army Energy Expert, Todd Hallaway.  I promised to give him two working prototypes.

The first prototype uses the quick and dirty soldering method.  It has a COP of 200 and an Output Power of 12 watts peak-to-peak.  You are welcome to take picture and adjust the two oscilloscopes yourself.  Some have already done that earlier on in the hands-on workshop.

The second prototype was done by Aaron Quant professionally on a circuit board.  It has a COP of 130 and an Output Power of 1.5 watts peak-to-peak.

There are a number of other prototypes built earlier by the participants in the workshop.  I shall let them demonstrate the fruit of their research.  The passing criteria is COP greater than 1.

In addition, there is a one-second flasher that has been running for over 8 weeks nonstop.  It has been running in the Office of Prof. Dennis Leung in the last 3 weeks and is expected to flash well beyond the Inno Tech Design Expo 2010 in Dec 2-4 at the Hong  Kong Convention Center.

Optionally, Aaron will demonstrate his solar light keychain that can light up 108 LEDs; a non-flashing (or flashing at 38 Hertz) toroid modified from the commercially available GEX-50.  Aaron will take over my equipment and research in Hong Kong when I go to USA.

Have fun.  Feel free to touch the prototype, take pictures and ask questions.  The seasoned and the just trained enthusiastic “experts” are here today.  If you break them, they can fix them.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited

[ltseung888]

Planned Discussion Session Questions for the Oct 9 workshop at HKU

1.   Do you believe that the Chinese, USA and other Countries already developed some form of Lead-out Energy Machines but are keeping them secret because of the vast military significance?
2.   Do you really believe in the Steven Mark TPU video?  Can it possibly be real?
3.   What are the difficulties with lead-out energy resonance hunting?  How different is it from sound resonance?
4.   How different is your existing FLEET demonstration from the gadgetmail device described on the overunity.com forum?
5.   What do you think the Hong Kong and Chinese Governments will do when you demonstrate your FLEET prototype in USA?
6.   If Lead-out Energy Theory is so simple and the FLEET prototype is so cheap to reproduce, what is the reason that you are not getting financial support in Hong Kong and China?
7.   Why are there so much negative comments on the Internet on you and on FLEET? 
8.   What is your reaction to the many negative comments on the Internet and in other circles?
9.   Do you really think that an old, retired man like you with no financial resources or support can win against the existing powerful oil interests and military concerns?
10.   How would the power structure of the World change if Lead-Out Energy is readily available?
11.   What do you think will be the outcome of your demonstration and presentation in USA?
12.   What will you say to those who accuse you of stealing ideas from others on the Internet?
You are welcome to raise more questions now or later.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited