Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[pese]

If there is no reciever still the energy is there.
You can place 100 radio's in one room to make the sound louder.

DUMBASS

WRONG  !!

If you use 100 radios, You must supply they wit an lot of energy to drive THE AMPLIFIERS
for the loudspeakers !!!

-

I you will use 100 Crystal radios, that need no eternal power .... Than... Nothing go louder, because
100 tuned receiving coils, diodes and the ballast ost
the 100pcs 2000 Ohms "Loads"  will damping the SOURCE (transmitter) and SUCKING and damping  from the "transmitter".

his Test with Transmitter, crystal radio  abd
an Radio with amplifier, i have done (as child) 50 years ago.

Nothing have changed in the pysics all the years...
Pese 


ADD.:

You can be sure, that THE SAME PHYSICS is
VALID also for your  "acousic fork"

If the "receiver is tuned on same frequeny (acousic fork) that is "damped" (in the funcion as an "ballast". THAN it such up energy from transmitter...
It not need to discussing that, only belive or try yourself

[XS-NRG]

I WAS TALKING ABOUT THE TRANSMITTER PART COMPARED TO TUNNING FORKS.

THIS IS GOING NOWHERE!!!!!
STUPID OBSERVER!!!!!!!!! F*** HOW STUPID CAN YOU BE ?

[allcanadian]

@XS-NRG

I WAS TALKING ABOUT THE TRANSMITTER PART COMPARED TO TUNNING FORKS.
THIS IS GOING NOWHERE!!!!!
STUPID OBSERVER!!!!!!!!! F*** HOW STUPID CAN YOU BE ?

The only question that seems relevant here is have you ever done any of these tests or is your answer based solely on something you read in a textbook somewhere? You see science is not worshipping the information in some textbook as if it were some kind of fanatical religion and then ranting at anyone who does not agree. Science is when you form a premise then perform experiments to prove the matter for yourself.
Maybe you can give your supposed expert opinion on this experiment-----

Experiment 1:Take a pendulum which is free to swing on its fulcrum using a ball bearing, lift it a set height, let go then record how long it takes to come to a complete stop.

Experiment 2:Take two pendulums which are identical to the pendulum in experiment (1) and attach each of these pendulums on each end of a beam which is free to rotate about its center on a bearing. We now have three points of rotation, pendulum 1, the center of the beam and pendulum 2. Lift "one" of the pendulums the same height as in experiment (1) then let it go and record how long it takes the apparatus to come to a complete stop.

Now before you go and make any more silly comments you should understand that in each experiment an identical  mass was lifted an identical height and released thus the energy input is and must always be identical. Can you tell me why the apparatus in experiment 2 was in motion three to four times longer than in experiment 1 ?. Now one could start ranting about the conservation of energy or rant about claims of overunity but I am not claiming anything other than experiment 2 will run much longer and there is a perfectly reasonable explanation why it does so. As well if you build two beams with four pendulums and seven points of rotation the time in motion increases substantially yet again. The result of this simple experiment also relates directly to why resonance would seem to imply more energy or an energy gain but it is really a drastic gain in efficiency above that expected. You see it is one thing to ridicule others based on an incomplete understanding of something you once read in a textbook and it is quite another to practice science through actual research and experiment.
Regards
AC

[The Observer]

All Canadian,

You said,

Science is when you form a premise
                                                                   then perform experiments
                                                                                                                     to prove the matter for yourself.

Brilliant definition.
Thankyou.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XS,

I'm pretty sure I am more Intelligent than you profess.

However, your Passion    that my assertion on the Tuning Forks is wrong       is very interesting.
For one thing, I have never seen you type in all Caps !

Did you know that an Acoustic Guitar is 1000 times louder than an Electric Guitar and rings longer?
The Acoustic Chamber of an Acoustic Guitar AMPLIFIES the Sound from the strings.
Please read the Wiki entry below if you think I'm wrong.

If you have an Acoustic Guitar, follow the instructions below.
I call myself the Observer because truth can only be deciphered by an impartial Observer.
Clear away what anyone has told you, and do the experiment without prior judgment.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LT,

One can also test the the "two tuning fork experiment" with an acoustic guitar.

                There are 7 'Tuning Forks' on the guitar.
                                                                             6 Strings and 1 Acoustic Chamber.

If you have one.. 1. just tune the top 3 strings to the same tone.
                          2. then test by strumming 1 string, with the other 2 damped.
                          3. then test by strumming 1 string, with the other 2 free.
                          4. Repeat   #2 and  #3  many times... Count the length and listen for loudness.
                         
                                          If you have trouble tuning... you can do it without using your ears.
                                          Just watch the string you are tuning...
                                          When it is tuned correctly, it will visibly vibrate when the 1st string is strummed.

                                       ----------------------------------------------------------------

As far as my resonating audio transformer experiment goes,
I will try to put a summary together when I get my workbench up and running.
Jist is... when you resonate a typical Transformer, by however means, it bursts with energy.

My best idea for you is this...
Why? For one, it is an easy way to light a CFL from your current setup.

1. Buy an Ignition Coil from the Auto Store.
2. Use a Signal Generator and an O-Scope to determine it's Resonant Frequency.
3. Use an O-Scope to design/tune your Best Joule Thief to the Resonant Frequency of the Ignition Coil.
4. Hook up output of the JT... to Input of the Ignition Coil. &  fine tune to resonance.
5. Measure output of Ignition Coil, and see if it lights a CFL for the better part of a day (1.5 V battery).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pirate,
       
Hope you got a chance to read my response to your prior on the last page.
To recap...
               
You said,

Also doubt what you claim about the tuning forks.
I would like to see some experimental evidence on this.
Because IF what you claim is true, then one could have a single tuning fork, say in A, and have 10 million other forks...

My claim, for those just joining, is that 2 tuning forks ring louder and longer than 1.
I just wanted to know what the Dictionary's definition of Sound Resonance meant to you.
Your interpretation in layman's words, if you will.

I inquired,

5. Acoustics - Intensification and prolongation of sound, especially of a musical tone, produced by sympathetic vibration.

                                 What does     Intensification and Prolongation of Sound ... mean to you?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

[XS-NRG]

haha sure 

i know one when i see one.