Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[chrisC]

good lord, he really IS delusional isnt he 

I really feel sorry for his daughter. How do you advice someone whose parent whilst seemingly normal becomes a clown & moron trying so hard to prove his technical worth?

Now I think most people on this thread now understands Mr. Tseung really is psychotic.

cheers
chrisC

[The Observer]

Poynt,

You say,

As I mentioned at the beginning, that dictionary definition is wrong

5. Acoustics- An Intensification and Prolongation of Sound, Especially Musical Tone, produced by Sympathetic Vibration.

Do you realize that I tested this...
                                 came up with Louder and Longer on my own,
                                                                                      then found the Dictionary supported my Observation??
       
           As I said, One Acoustic Guitar can demonstrate this effect by tuning all the strings to the same tone.
           If you Cover the hole, and Damp 5 of the strings... the resultant sound is Softer and Shorter.
           Have you tried this? I'm sure you will reconsider your statement if you witness this effect first hand.
                                                     
Anyways, I'm sure you have some good ideas about experimentation in the area of (USEs) Unrecognized Energy Sources.
I do appreciate your time on this, as most don't even seem to comprehend my claim.
Perhaps the time has come to agree to disagree.

                               Surely  you  encourage  experimenting  with  that  which  arouses  one's  curiosity.
                                      ---> Therefore, I'll be experimenting with Resonating Transformers. <---
                                                              Why? See O-Scope Readings Below.

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

[ltseung888]

Source of Sound Energy as explained by the Kinetic Theory of Gases.

I believe all physicists and chemists have learned the Kinetic Theory of Gases as part of their training.

The Kinetic Theory of Gases assumes that:

1.   There are many gas molecules colliding with the surrounding walls and with one another.  They are constantly in motion and each of their kinetic energy is given by the formula 1/2 mV*V where m is the mass of the molecule and V is the velocity of the molecule.

2.   The pressure exerted on the walls or containers is a result of the collision of these molecules on these walls or containers.

3.   If a gas is in motion, we can treat that more molecules move in one direction.  (With a solid, if it moves with velocity v, all molecules must travel together with the same velocity v as they are rigidly bounded to each other).

4.   This means we can actually use the kinetic energy associated with the gas molecules if we can induce more to go in one direction than another.

5.   Furthermore, because there is plenty of space between the molecules, we can compress or expand the gas (decrease or increase their distance of separation).

6.   A sound wave is an ordered compression and expansion of such molecules.  This pulsing action “produces an ordered motion” rather than the random motion of the gas molecules.

7.   The ordered motion leads-out or brings-in the kinetic energy associated with the molecules.

Such an explanation is perfectly logical and does not violate any Laws of Physics.

The Almighty has clearly directed us to the true understanding of resonance in sound.  The energy associated with a tuning fork and a resonance tube is more than that of the tuning fork alone because of the kinetic energy from the gas molecules.  We used some of the striking energy from the tuning fork to lead-out the kinetic energy of the gas molecules.  There is no mystery to the increase in energy!

I wonder whether other scientists ever proposed this link between resonance and the kinetic energy of gas molecules previously???

It is so obvious that a single tuning fork will convert the struck energy into sound energy and radiate that in all directions.  Only a tiny part could be picked up by a second or third or fourth tuning fork.  How can that tiny energy produce the loud resonance or sympathetic vibration sound?

We know from the kinetic theory of gases that there is already a huge amount of moving energy associated with a group of gas molecules.  When this group of gas molecules are stationary, there are equal number of molecules bombarding the surrounding walls in all the six directions (+X, -X, +Y,-Y,+Z,-Z).  In layman terms, the directions are left, right, front, back, top and bottom. 

If we can “induce” more to move in the +X direction, there will be less bombarding in the other directions.  This is the Bernoulli’s effect and the classic explanation of why airplanes fly.  The question is â€" can the “induction energy” be less than the lead-out or bring-in kinetic energy?

The sound resonance phenomenon clearly demonstrated a YES answer.

I know that I am the first one to propose this link in this thread.  Am I the first physicist to propose this in this World? 

Will the forum members (including the naysayers) be able to point us to other sources that proposed this link elsewhere previously?

God works in mysterious ways.  I no longer have the oscilloscopes and the team to help me build the prototypes.  But the scientific achievements have not stopped!

[poynt99]

Poynt,

You say,
5. Acoustics- An Intensification and Prolongation of Sound, Especially Musical Tone, produced by Sympathetic Vibration.

Do you realize that I tested this...
                                 came up with Louder and Longer on my own,
                                                                                      then found the Dictionary supported my Observation??
       
           As I said, One Acoustic Guitar can demonstrate this effect by tuning all the strings to the same tone.
           If you Cover the hole, and Damp 5 of the strings... the resultant sound is Softer and Shorter.
           Have you tried this? I'm sure you will reconsider your statement if you witness this effect first hand.
                                                     
Anyways, I'm sure you have some good ideas about experimentation in the area of (USEs) Unrecognized Energy Sources.
I do appreciate your time on this, as most don't even seem to comprehend my claim.
Perhaps the time has come to agree to disagree.

                               Surely  you  encourage  experimenting  with  that  which  arouses  one's  curiosity.
                                      ---> Therefore, I'll be experimenting with Resonating Transformers. <---
                                                              Why? See O-Scope Readings Below.

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

I encourage experimenting, absolutely. I also encourage deep analysis and thorough research. With the exception of those two scope shots (which mean very little without supporting data) I have not seen evidence here of any of the above 3.

Claims are numerous and cheap to make. Sadly, most don't even attempt to support their claims with credible evidence (nor know how to go about it), and thus far it holds true in this case as well.

I think the basis for and normality of your observations has been adequately explained to you here, and it is up to you now to refute them by clearly demonstrating the existence of those so-called USE's and the resulting OU or FE.

Good luck!

.99

[ltseung888]

Can we consider the First tuning fork as an energy lead-out device?

Even the first tuning fork will cause the air molecules to vibrate in an “ordered” fashion.  That may already bring-out the kinetic energy of the gas molecules.

This really changes our understanding of sound and many fundamental concepts in Physics.  The element of bringing-in energy is present all the time but is best illustrated at resonance.

Thank you, God, for this revelation.