Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

Prototype D shipped out

One potential verifier tried to produce a FLEET prototype on his own.  He did not have the yellow one inch toroid.  He used a green larger toroid instead.

His question was â€" he used 40 turns Joule Thief winding and 80 turns transformer winding.  The LED on the Joule Thief and the LED on the secondary circuit both lighted up.  However, the COP peak-to-peak value as obtained from his oscilloscopes was less than 1.  What has he done wrong?  What is the magic to achieve high COP?

The answer is â€" we are doing resonance hunting here.  You can push a swing at any frequency and it is likely to go higher.  But there is only one frequency of push that will make the swing go much higher than the rest.  That is known as the resonance frequency of the swing.

The reason that both LEDs are lighted is similar.  Even at non-resonance frequency, some energy will be imparted to the system via the pulsing.  Some of the energy will be wasted if the pushing is applied while the swing is moving towards the pushing force.  It will damp the motion instead of reinforcing it.

Now to the interesting part â€" What is the magic to achieve high COP?

1.   After Observer posted the Joule Thief work on the overunity forum, I experimented with the basic Joule Thief.  After three attempts, my Joule Thief lighted the LED.
2.   I then experimented with the 7 inch air-core toroids as they are similar in external appearance to the Steven Mark TPU.  The standard Joule Thief Circuit did not show COP > 1.
3.   I got the inspiration that â€" may be the Joule Thief is already a resonating system.  The transistor will try to maintain a resonance frequency with its electronic components.  If that were so, I might be able to draw some energy from it and allow it to go back to the resonance condition (similar to the Tong Wheel).
4.   I then put in transformer type windings as an additional secondary circuit.  It worked.  MK1 later posted that he did something similar earlier but he never used the two oscilloscope display to claim conclusively COP > 1.
5.   I then worked with Dr. Raymond Ting, an invention verifier for Beijing.  In the secondary circuit, we had a LED, a variable resistor and a changing capacitor.  Since we could not get a variable capacitor that can cover a large range, we keep swapping capacitors while watching the Instantaneous Power Waveforms on the two oscilloscopes.
6.   Dr. Raymond Ting was able to get a configuration with COP peak-to-peak greater than 100 and Instantaneous Output Power greater than 40 watts peak-to-peak.  That particular configuration was shown on July 19, 2010 to some professors and the Lawyer of the Investor, Mr. Conroy Cheng.  Mr. Cheng is the heir to the third richest family in Hong Kong.
7.   Mr. Cheng was the person who gave HK$50,000 for the two oscilloscope demonstration with no strings attached.  At that time, he and his advisors thought that demonstrating COP > 1 within two weeks by Lawrence Tseung and his student helpers was impossible. 
8.   When the demonstration was successful, commercial interest took over.  The funding went to Dr. James Wong, the chairman of Institute of Energy and a long term friend of the father of Mr. Cheng instead.
9.   Mr. Tseung then decided to find the cheapest FLEET prototype that could demonstrate COP > 1.  With God’s Blessing, he found that the one inch yellow toroid with 13 turns Joule Thief winding and 25 Transformer winding worked. 
10.   Mr. Tseung and his helpers then played with that basic yellow toroid and varied the number of turns and the value of electronic components used.  To their delight, they could eliminate the capacitor and still achieve a high COP value.
11.   The present thought or belief is â€" the cheap one-inch toroid with 13 JT windings may be close to a resonance condition (could be a harmonic).  Slight changes may send the COP to higher than 280 (peak-to-peak).  Over thirty such prototypes with COP > 1 has been produced in Hong Kong and Shenzhen.  One was produced in USA.
12.   There was a suggestion that we should mass produce such Fleet prototypes and send them to Universities all over the World.  At present, every prototype was hand-built.  It is like asking the student to make their own tuning forks to demonstrate the sound resonance experiment.
13.   Unfortunately, the Hong Kong investor(s) through his lawyer said: “Why should I invest if the result is given to the World free?  How can I make money?”  Now, Major Todd Hathaway has put in US$600.  That is sufficient for at least 100 prototypes if I order the parts from China.
14.   To conclude, the magic lies in finding a working configuration (by luck or many days of trying) and then experiment around it.  Mr. Aaron Quant bought 50 such yellow toroids and he was able to light a 108 LED Christmas Tree.  You can do the same.
15.   I shall send out many more prototypes to qualified verifiers worldwide before the evil powers get me!

God is producing miracles again.  FLEET prototypes may be available worldwide with the US-China Cooperation. Amen.

[XS-NRG]

What is the magic to achieve high COP?

Become a Clown

[Omnibus]

So, the hunch that JT may be an OU device is based on the observation that it can revive dead batteries. The logic goes -- since the battery is dead there's nothing in it and the JT turns it into a producer of something and, therefore, will see, time will tell, it may be OU, is that it? How irrelevant is that question?

I see people getting very excited by what @lasersaber is showing but that's again lighting lamps for a cetrain time off of charged capacitors. That may be iteresting and practical but where's the OU to be worth discussin in an OU forum?

[markdansie]

@Lawrence
the investor (with the $50,000) is very wise. He said you would not prove a COP of greater than 1 in under 2 weeks. he was right given you cant use peak to peak voltage.
he also made a good point...what is in it for me if you are giving the info for free to the world. Its his money so he made a good point.
many on this forum has asked why you do not understand that reading peak to peak is not the correct way. having been advised by many about this and continuing to ignore it is now heading into new territory of fraudulent behaviour. Its ok if people donate money like you received to continue your work but if you use data ever to try and convince people to part with large sums of money using a technique for measuring that has been pointed out to you as false then you could be breaking a few laws (check out wire fraud)
So I suggest you tread carefully when seeking money.
In the mean time keep up the posts...i do need my daily dose of laughter.
Mark

[XS-NRG]

So, the hunch that JT may be an OU device is based on the observation that it can revive dead batteries. The logic goes -- since the battery is dead there's nothing in it and the JT turns it into a producer of something and, therefore, will see, time will tell, it may be OU, is that it? How irrelevant is that question?

I see people getting very excited by what @lasersaber is showing but that's again lighting lamps for a cetrain time off of charged capacitors. That may be iteresting and practical but where's the OU to be worth discussin in an OU forum?

NO !

How stupid
The energy in the battery is too low to blink a LED directly.
The JT is a blocking oscillator and it discharges it's flyback through the LED.
The voltage simply goes up and when it is above the nominal voltage of the LED it will blink.

THat's all there is to it and everybody who thinks a JT has a COP>1 is a Clown and everybody who thinks a JT is OU is a Clown too.