Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



LaFonte Group can turn off permanent magnet without work

Started by Paul-R, March 03, 2010, 06:31:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Butch LaFonte

Larry,
You know, this would work in a rotary fashion. Also, if you put a stator on each side of the rotor magnets you would take the thrust load off the rotor bearing.
I will make a drawing of a 16 (two eight stator rings) stator, 16 magnet rotor for future reference.
Butch

LarryC

[A author=Butch LaFonte link=topic=8852.msg236503#msg236503 date=1270573433]
You know, this would work in a rotary fashion. Also, if you put a stator on each side of the rotor magnets you would take the thrust load off the rotor bearing.
I will make a drawing of a 16 (two eight stator rings) stator, 16 magnet rotor for future reference.
[/quote]

Agreed and understand your comment, I'm sure my watt lost, between no stator and with stator, is due to frictional loss, because the AC motor is not meant to be pulled out by the strong magnets parallel to the AC motor rotor.

Please check out the attached concept, as displayed, it shows four nodes and four slots with an internal magnet rotor. This can easily be increased to any multiple number of nodes, slots for commercial size generators.

Regards, Larry

Blainiac

I wonder if you could have a mechanical setup by replacing the coils with one of Butch's other concepts, the separating plates? 
I conform to non-conformism.

Butch LaFonte

[A author=Blainiac link=topic=8852.msg236598#msg236598 date=1270628305]
I wonder if you could have a mechanical setup by replacing the coils with one of Butch's other concepts, the separating plates?
[/quote]
That is a very interesting idea!
Butch

wattsup

Quote from: LarryC on April 06, 2010, 06:07:40 PM
[A author=Butch LaFonte link=topic=8852.msg236503#msg236503 date=1270573433]
You know, this would work in a rotary fashion. Also, if you put a stator on each side of the rotor magnets you would take the thrust load off the rotor bearing.
I will make a drawing of a 16 (two eight stator rings) stator, 16 magnet rotor for future reference.


Agreed and understand your comment, I'm sure my watt lost, between no stator and with stator, is due to frictional loss, because the AC motor is not meant to be pulled out by the strong magnets parallel to the AC motor rotor.

Please check out the attached concept, as displayed, it shows four nodes and four slots with an internal magnet rotor. This can easily be increased to any multiple number of nodes, slots for commercial size generators.

Regards, Larry

@LarryC

If your stator has many individual winds, I suggest you put a diode after each one individually, then put them in parallel, and not, in parrallel then all on one diode. This will cut out themutual drag that is devellopped and shared amonst the coils. This way, once the magnet passes the coil, the energy is taken out and cannot re-effect the coil.