Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



LaFonte Group can turn off permanent magnet without work

Started by Paul-R, March 03, 2010, 06:31:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

LarryC

Quote from: Blainiac link=topic=8852.msg241423#msg241423 A=1273868524
Okay!  I remember seeing that.  I also think I remember seeing a modification by you that took away the slots to have a full toroid?  Is that correct?  How did that test go?  I'm just so broke here I get anxious to ask questions.  :)  Are you planning on adding additional coils or extending the shaft to see what happens with more goodies?  It's so exciting!

I did do this simulation as well to check for clogging relative to the rotor in an 8-coil dual rotor setup, although it does look a little weird it's correct I think.

I think it's cool how the rotor sees basically no difference in torque.  I can't wait to see someone's build possibly powering itself.

I think Butch proposed the no slot toroid. So no test on my part.

I have no additional test planned. The clogging is very small. But, I find the constant pull of the magnet against the toroid core more of a issue. It is like strong gravity, but without the advantage of stored momentum as would be with a flywheel, so it is a constant torque restraint.

Honk's point about MPP opposed to silicon steel is good, but more at a much higher frequency then I'm using (50HZ). Also, I like the much higher permability of silicon steel in this situation to pass the flux from the toroid to the H type transformer.

@All, FYI, Honk is the top electronic circuit designer/builder that I've seen on this site.

@Blainiac, your simulation is interesting, but does not seem to have coils on the outside cores that would effect the torque.

Regards, Larry   

Blainiac

Quote
Hey Blainiac,

I have gone back and opened, and re-saved one of your previous links...for whatever reason I can view, but not save this one.

Is it possible you may have accidentally coded this one or something ?

Regards...

Hmm, interesting.  The gif is stored here, I think that's what you're looking for Cap-Z-ro:

http://nullium.fileave.com/relativetorotor.gif

Quote
I think Butch proposed the no slot toroid. So no test on my part.

I have no additional test planned. The clogging is very small. But, I find the constant pull of the magnet against the toroid core more of a issue. It is like strong gravity, but without the advantage of stored momentum as would be with a flywheel, so it is a constant torque restraint.

Honk's point about MPP opposed to silicon steel is good, but more at a much higher frequency then I'm using (50HZ). Also, I like the much higher permability of silicon steel in this situation to pass the flux from the toroid to the H type transformer.

@All, FYI, Honk is the top electronic circuit designer/builder that I've seen on this site.

@Blainiac, your simulation is interesting, but does not seem to have coils on the outside cores that would effect the torque.

Regards, Larry

Ahh, yes.  I understand what you're saying and I tried to simulate that.  I didn't know exactly how I would introduce the counter-field produced by the coils in FEMM, but I'd love to figure out how to make a more accurate simulation.  Also you said the constant pull of the magnet against the toroid is more of an issue.  I think I read something you said earlier about if the magnet's closer it's less of a problem, correct?
I conform to non-conformism.

LarryC

Quote from: Blainiac on May 15, 2010, 02:40:14 AM
I think I read something you said earlier about if the magnet's closer it's less of a problem, correct?

No, the closer the magnet's to the toroid, the more torque required to turn the rotor. The LaFonte Group version would experience less torque, because of the shorter distance from rotor center. 

It may have been this comment, that when the H cut transformer is against the toroid, the clogging at the slits is very small. When the H cut transformer is pulled away and the magnets only sees the toroid, then the slit clogging is higher.

Regards, Larry

Butch LaFonte

We have a new design we will post in a few days. It uses no permanent magnets, no exotic materials, just copper wire and powdered hard magnetic steel or ferrite.
Butch

Cap-Z-ro


Sounds very interesting and creative as usual butch...can't wait to see what you've come up with.

Regards...