HHO generator as limitless energy

[HeairBear]

Paul-R, I have read all of that site many times and most of it still makes me laugh. Nice try though! can you confirm any of what that chapter has written in it yourself? Have you had success with any one of those designs? I just can't imagine anyone whom has had any experience at all in electrolysis would say what you have stated earlier without definite proof and not regurgitating the words of others unchecked. I know you have been here at this forum for some time and your post count shows it. It is none the less sad that you have no evidence of your own to back up what you and others claim.

It pains me to see new people come here looking for information to better themselves only to be bombarded with hyperbole and less than pertinent information scantily gathered from unchecked sources. We have been over this subject many, many times on this forum and have proved it wrong every time. Why do you beat this dead horse over and over? I understand you have an opinion and you are entitled to it. But, opinions and facts are two different entities altogether and you must differentiate between the two.  If you say 48.2Khz and two octaves is the way to go, please explain your thesis in detail. If you can truly show any working model, I will replicate it and confirm it.

[Paul-R]

Paul-R, I have read all of that site many times and most of it still makes me laugh. Nice try though! can you confirm any of what that chapter has written in it yourself? Have you had success with any one of those designs? I just can't imagine anyone whom has had any experience at all in electrolysis would say what you have stated earlier without definite proof and not regurgitating the words of others unchecked. I know you have been here at this forum for some time and your post count shows it. It is none the less sad that you have no evidence of your own to back up what you and others claim.

It pains me to see new people come here looking for information to better themselves only to be bombarded with hyperbole and less than pertinent information scantily gathered from unchecked sources. We have been over this subject many, many times on this forum and have proved it wrong every time. Why do you beat this dead horse over and over? I understand you have an opinion and you are entitled to it. But, opinions and facts are two different entities altogether and you must differentiate between the two.  If you say 48.2Khz and two octaves is the way to go, please explain your thesis in detail. If you can truly show any working model, I will replicate it and confirm it.

So, HeairBear knows more than Bob Boyce, eh?

[HeairBear]

Are you confirming Bob Boyce's work is valid? Or are you regurgitating what you have read?

[mscoffman]

By use of a simple condenser, and a small pump to pump the "water exhaust" back in the water container. What if it was possible to make gasoline by running electrolysis on the exhaust... reversing the combustion process?

Gasoline is basicly hydrogen and carbon. It combusts with oxygen in the air and leave CO2 and H2O. Maybe it is hard to convert CO2 into COO? Let CO2 be absorbed in water under pressure and then run electrolysis on it?
But it will be possible to convert that H2O into HHO - and overflow the water tank, or take conversion loss into account, and then be able to leave the water level constant.

So at the end we fill the gasoline tank and the water tank only once - then run the car forever...(?)

Vidar

If one had a very potent overunity energy supply to source the energy...

Rather than targeting gasoline fuel from ICE exhaust, target; ethanol - ethyl alcohol
plus a little methanol for denaturing. Ethanol is chemically much simpler than gasoline
a would require less built-in QA quality assurance monitoring...it ignites at a much
higher energy than gasoline...and it's fumes are relatively safe to be around...Simply
dilute with water it in case of accidental spills. I think storing ethanol is much safer
than even storing hydrogen gas. Methanol, while even simpler, it and it's fumes are
poisons. One could absorb a little CO2 and H2O from the environment for chemical
process makeup feeds.

ethanol:  C2H5OH   vs   gasoline: is a mixture of hydrocarbons some of which can
                                              be isomers branched at different C positions.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[Paul-R]

Are you confirming Bob Boyce's work is valid? Or are you regurgitating what you have read?

I have no plans to do either.