Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Self running coil?

Started by gotoluc, March 13, 2010, 12:40:57 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

skywatcher

Quote from: gotoluc on March 17, 2010, 08:22:57 PM
Hi skywatcher and everyone,

I think there is something special with this toroid but I still need to test it compared to another toroid. If I measure one half, it is exactly 260mh (both wound to be identical) and once they are combined it measures 1,043mH. When magnet is applied it will drop up to 1,000mH.

Luc

This fits exactly to my explanation. If you combine the two halves, they cancel each other out and you see only a small difference because they are not exactly identical. It would be interesting what happens if you tune the two halves so that the difference is exactly zero. I think something should happen in this case. You may get more efficiency, or you may lose it completely.

It would also be interesting to make another coil (same core, same amount of wire) but with a normal winding.

Magluvin

Some cores are not ferrite, unless you purchased them and they are what they say. Some are conductive iron, like a big thick washer with a coating on them. If you scrape a bit of coating off, you will see shiny iron, or flat charcoal grey ferrite.

Mags

Magluvin

Im surprized TK didnt say to take it to a university.  I know a couple others that would say so also.
But this is different. This person is almost threatening. But just keep going and ignore.
As far as Im concerned you are ahead of the orbo. ;]

Mags

ramset

Luc
"Take it to a university"

Is most definitely the mantra of Paul.

You should put that person on your ignore list at You tube.

This community recognizes you for the great researcher and humanitarian you are.
Don't let one sour note spoil your symphony.

Chet
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

wattsup

@gotoluc

It is very simple. Your bucking mode wound but reverse connected coil is doing a double wammy.

When the first wound coil starts getting energized, it is already starting to impart to the core that already imparts to the the 2nd coil, and when the same discharge that hit the first coil now reaches the second coil that was actual precharged via the core, this then imparts to the core that imparts back to the 1st coil just before it gets hit again. 1st coil gets hit, imparts to second, then on top of that the 2nd gets hit then imparts to the first. So instead of doing the standard pulse one coil and draw off the other, when the charge finally leaves the coil, it had underwent a double hit on the core which forcibly translated to an added exchange to the output.

The best part of that is when you will one day wind a bucking primary over your existing very very nice thin 30 awg actual secondary. You then replace all the connections that went to your secondary to the new primary then feed off the secondary to send it also back to source. This should charge your battery. lol

Also, imagine instead of putting the five layers per coil then out of each, you make first layer first coil, then go to first layer second coil, then 2nd layer of first coil, then directly to second layer of second coil, all the way through the five layers. What would be the result? Why do I say that. Because of your loose winds, I don't think all five layers are required for that size toroid core but all five would be more useful as described successive mutual layers. That would be like a 10 wammy. I wonder if the result would be additive or compounded. Let's ask a banker. lol

I really like what you do @gotoluc , very inspiring, so please keep on digging it up.

So much fun.