Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Bruce's Discovery, Tesla's Missing Link for his Unipolar Generator!

Started by Bruce_TPU, March 21, 2010, 07:22:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

gravityblock

Broli,

I'm trying to revive one of your old threads at the energeticforum.  I hope you take a look at the publication on "hidden momentum" found in the below thread.  Hidden momentum may be a factor in this thread also. It's good to see you're still around.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3935-magnet-motor-using-repeling-magnets-radial-magnets-if-availbale.html#post141123

Thanks,

GB
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

broli

Yes it's all related, it all comes down to moving charge that cause forces to act and react.

dieter

Wow.


Somebody call Mulder and Scully. This is real twilight zone stuff.


Steve posted frequently about every step of his project, up to page 11, then all of a sudden and for no reason he suddently disappears. At the same time the thread get's flooded by some weirdo offtopic spam. A brief note by gravityblock, about continuing a related topic on another forum, then exitus.


You guys can't he serious. What were the results? Even if you were completely unsuccessful, let us know! Even if you were locked up in a sanatory due to "free energy mental disorder", let us know... we may get you out of there, Rambo style.


On page 2 or 3 or so, some phantastic suggestions were made (a real HEUREKA experience, don't miss it!). See the drawing of the two HPGs on one axle, one of them with reverse polarity, connected in series: basicly  brushless HPG! Even if that isn't OU, it's a remarkable achievement! None tried that? Unbelievable! So simple, logic and coherent (just as a smartass sprinkle word)...


A couple of very basic questions I got, that maybe somebody can answer due to first hand practical experience:


When we rotate Disc and Magnet and we use eg. only carbon brushes, but abolutely no metals in the near environment  so no "external circuit", do we still get a voltage/current?


We know we won't get a voltage when the load rotates with the disc, but does (as gravityblock assumed) a second HPG of opposite rotation substitute the "external circuit"? Does it even double the potential?


If so, does instead of opposite rotation a simple opposite polarity work as well?


If so, then you know what that means. We could rotate them on the same axle, with the load between them in series, as described by Gravityblock.


Furthermore it was said, to use a HPG as a HPM, one would have to use an input that is of the opposite polarity, compared to the output of the HPG, when rotating in the same direction... I think that is nonsense! Please somebody confirm this!


Furthermore, I find it very interesting to imagine what happens when you simply loop the current flow: the more  current is generated, the more it will feed to itself. With low losses there may be a recursive selfamplification to some degree.


Furthermore, assuming the structure of the disc, eg. a pancake coil, is so that it generates an electromagnet as soon as current flows, and that magnet ADDS to the permanent magnet (which is simply a matter of cw vs ccw), then, due to the fact that the output of the HPG is RPM * (Diameter^2)*Magnet strength, this will also recursively add to the efficiency!


BUT... it could be that the HPG needs some sort of radial electron propagation and a pancake coil and esp. a serial bifilar one, may not provide enough radial paths, so the initial, old idea of the spiral sections as a middle way may be the better choice. Of course both should be tested. The prototype should allow to turn the discs/coils by 180° (cw vs ccw) and the axle to rotate in both directions, this way it should be possible to test if this theory fits the real world.


At least, it was Tesla who said he was able to run a HPG as a fuelless generator.


Would be nice if somebody is still in here, or at least has some helpfull information.


BR


Paul-R

Quote from: broli on May 19, 2011, 02:21:32 AM
Here's the motor concept.

The spiral disk and the solid disk are only connected at the axis. Both of the disks spin together, the magnet is stationary. There should be no induced emf as both disks generate an equal amount of voltage when spun, however the solid disk produces a torque while the spiral disk does not.
This reminds me of Tesla's (monofilar) pancake coil. I wonder if this advances the thinking in any way.

dieter

Well, a pancake coil instead of a disc was the whole point of Bruces project. As I said, pity he never posted the results.


I am currently doing some tests, but working with tiny models is rather fruitless, because the output quadruples with the radius: speed * magnet strength * (radius^2). That said, these generators tend to have very marginal outputs, like a few millivolts with a few milliamps, eg. from 2 microwave ring magnets sandwiching a copper disc. Which is silly when you rotate them with a 300W motor.
But lets assume a 8cm disc outputs 1 Watt, then a 128 cm disc would deliver 256 watt, with the same rpm and field strength. Well, still not that much, considering the size.


Nevertheless: Tesla was convinced that a self+exciting operation must be possible, with spiral intersections.

.BTW. why did nobody ever try ionized water instead of a brush, for the rim contact?

BR