GBluer(Slayer) Exiter

[NickZ]

  I also agree with those thoughts. And I do support him, all the way, as he has my admiration.
  It is the idea that when one displays ideas, inventions and other personal information on the internet, the expected outcome is that it will be used, in any way that serve the needs of those that get that information. So, if you don't want to give it away, then don't give it, at all.
  It is nothing personal.  I would be pissed off, also. I do understand his feelings.

  This all needs to be worked out between us all, if possible, as it has happened, and may possibly continue happening in the future.

  I'm glad that there are people like you Chet,

   Nick_Z
   

[SeaMonkey]

Unless you have a better model for success or a better example to follow?

There is a better way.  Many are aware of it yet few choose
to adhere to it faithfully.

Our weaknesses, our fears and our resentments keep us
always wanting to turn to the right or to the left and
hence we deviate from the path which would take us to
good.

Has Slayer been wronged?  Think about this carefully.

When a poker player voluntarily shows his hand in a
game, it isn't possible later to cry "foul" when the
hand is lost.  Most of us learn that lesson early in life.

Clearly Slayer made an error in judgment.  He expected
something which wasn't possible to expect;  he wanted
others to agree to an unenforceable "condition."  Legally,
there is no way to accomplish that without an "agreement"
which entails the bond of word or the handshake.  Both parties
must agree to any and all conditions.

Slayer may now feel remorse for his lack of understanding
in this matter and he may even feel that he's been betrayed
or wronged.  But in truth he hasn't.

None of us can give something; and later take it back, without
causing problems.  Some mistakes simply cannot be undone.

Let's examine the circuit in question in depth to evaluate
whether it's possible that someone before has already done
it.  The circuit is essentially a Common Emitter Transistor
Amplifier configured as a form of Oscillator Circuit.  Some
will see the configuration as an Armstrong/Meissner circuit
while others may see it as a Hartley circuit.  The oscillation
sustaining feedback is provided by "transformer" action.

The secondary of the circuit, which establishes the frequency
of operation, is a Tesla Resonator or 1/4 Wave Helical Resonator.
This element, including an optional Top Hat Capacitor to enhance
the Induction Field Intensity, all belongs to Nikola Tesla who made
those discoveries long ago.

Whether the feedback is derived from a separate feedback
winding or directly from the base end of the Tesla Resonator Coil
is a choice for the experimenter.  Both methods work well
because both are low impedance and will match well the Base
Impedance of the Transistor.  When the Tesla Resonator Coil
is in operation its base end (or driven end) is its low impedance
end.  The opposite end, where the high voltage develops, is the
high impedance end.

The use of diodes across the Base and Emitter of the Transistor
to offer protection from excessive reverse bias is well established.
It is customary to use  one, two or three series connected diodes
to establish a safe level of reverse bias voltage (which prevents the
Base Emitter Junction from going into Reverse Breakdown or
Avalanche) in order to improve transistor turn-off speed and thereby
enhance circuit efficiency.

So when the circuit is analyzed piece by piece and function by
function it becomes apparent that it is all known technology that
has been utilized by many others in past years.

Of course, we would all like to think that our circuits are new and
unique and have never been done before.  But as we gain experience
we get over that.  It is humbling to discover that what we do today
with transistors has been done many times by others over the past
60 years.  Certain things are new such as leds and chips and mosfets,
but the principles remain unchanged.

Which brings to mind a question regarding a key aspect of the circuit:

Why is it necessary for the primary winding of the Tesla Coil to be at
the bottom end of the Tesla Resonator?

[Kultus]

Insted of all you bastards flapping off at the mouth, why don't you put some proof to your words.... show us who and when, with references, was before Gbluer to use this circuit in this manner .... if you cannot do that then your arguments are invalid, at least we have somewhere to point the finger and proof to back up what we are saying....  getting really tired of reading dribble from the peanut gallery.... no matter how long winded you make it or how intelligent your "try" to sound ... it's going to make you any more correct, you've still got it backwards

[SeaMonkey]

...why don't you put some proof to your words....
show us who and when, with references, was before
Gbluer to use this circuit in this manner

Excellent point!  In fact it is a legal requirement.

The "inventor" or "claimant" is charged with the
legal responsibility of conducting extensive research
to verify that the "invention or device" is indeed
new and unique and not simply a copy of "prior art."

This search will be gladly conducted by any Patent
Attorney for a reasonable fee.  But it must be diligently
accomplished before any Legal Claim of Intellectual
Property can be made.

Otherwise it would be Illegal.

[NickZ]

  "Insted of all you bastards flapping off at the mouth, why don't you put some proof to your words...."

   Ok,  this Brovin/Kacher circuit along with the two other circuits mentioned previously show many similarities, which also can light bulbs, as well as other functions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0q0W-ms38

  Most any blocking oscillator which has a large open ended secondary coil such as a Tesla type coil will act as an exciter.
  The word Exciter comes from Dr. Stiffler, which Gbluer has followed for several years.
  The fact that these circuits are slightly different is mainly a matter of degree.
But, all are blocking oscillators, used by several people years ago.
  This does not detract anything from the Slayer Exciter circuit, only adds more value to it, instead.

  NO need to insult...