Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


free energy circuit setup

Started by FreeEnergy, April 01, 2006, 02:35:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

FreeEnergy

NerzhDishual if experiment one (first picture) prooves to be true then i think it will work!

pg46

Hi All-

This stuff looks fun! - thanks FreeEnergy for the posts.

OK then so looking at experiment one first, wouldn't one need to record the speed(or revolutions) of the little DC motor in all tests before making any conclusions? Just as Elvis said it seems this doesn't prove anything as is. Also wouldn't at  6.5 volts running the motor be much slower anyways if it even ran at all??

In the other experiment with the dc dc converter. What exactly is a dc dc converter? I mean I have seen them for example as a 12VDC to 24VDC converter. So what in this test do we suppose it(the dc dc converter) is converting from and to then??

Just wondering

NerzhDishual

Hi Elvis,

OK. Misunderstanding/translation jam.
The "polemic" is over.
Please note that I have actually nothing against American 'people'
and most of time I do get along with...

'OU' or not 'OU' that is the question!
'OU' or 'mere' super-efficiency that is another question!
Does some experiment prove something that is a third question?

About resonance:
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_6/2.html
I had already downloaded this page.
I had also learnt that at school.
Voltage without current (or alternative voltage with current
but with cosine(phi)=0) means no power.
OK.
But if I can notwithstanding charge a cap with what seems to be only voltage
(i.e. with no power or very few power) that almost weld my screwdriver
when sort-circuited after being filled, I think that I am allowed to
ask me some questions.

About the caps/motor experiment:

My biggest cap is a (100 Euros) one farad "beast" that I dare not
to use for the moment...

I have tried to run my small 3 volt motor with a 10 000 uF/25 Volts
tiny cap (charged with a 12 volts bat).
The motor do not fire and runs during a big second :((...
That is not long enough for doing any measurement.

I have ordered a 100 000uF/40 volts (50 Euros).
This motor, if not burning, should run during a little bit more that 10 seconds.
I will try to measure the amps.

I'm not so in a rush, I would like to familiarize myself with caps before.

After that I will try the one Farad cap or spend more euros to order
a less 'greedy' and more fitted motor and another caps.

BTW (off topic?) I have already tried to charge a 1000 uf/400 volts cap
with a small Bedini motor running with a small not-in-good shape 7.2 Volts bat.
The neon is glowing.
When the cap is wired the neon stops glowing.
After few seconds le cap voltage reach more than 100 volts, the neon
is glowing again and the caps voltage keeps on increasing slowly until
about 120 volts.
After that I disconnect the cap and I short-circuit it with a big screwdriver.
The sound and the spark are noticeable.

Of course this is not science (for the moment) but just messing for the fun of it :)).
I have done no serious measurement. But I will.
I have just noticed that there is practically not current at the output
of a Bedini motor.

I must confess that one of my half baked crackpot ?secret? ideas
is to get a self running Bedini motor with only a cap.

You just fill the cap. And the motor lives one's own life.
Like the Reidar Finsrud?s ?moving sculpture? that you have to hand start.?

According to J. Bedini (as I can catch it) you can not close the loop with a single bat with his SSG motor?
A bat (which is a chemical device) can do only one thing at the same time:
being charged or giving electrical power.
Of course, I have tried to do it (just short-circuit the output, see the circuit). It does not explode anything but seems useless.
Of course you could imagine a flywheel and a switching circuit.
But does the bat would accept being so messed up?
Perhaps a cap (which is also a chemical device, apart from Leyde bottles)
could be more ?tolerant??

My problem is that I have to fill the cap with high (=/= 100/200 volts)
pulsed voltage and  I have to feed the 2N 3055 with less voltage.
Using another transistor?
But the serious caps are only rated for few volts
You can get a 100 farad/2.2 volts super cap? etc?

Ok. Off topic again. Sorry.

Very Best.


Nolite mittere margaritas ante porcos.

Elvis Oswald

again, I'm sorry if you took offense.  My intentions were good.
I'm no electrical engineer myself. :)

Any potential difference is voltage.  Resistance to that voltage generates current.  Voltage stored in the static field of a cap is limited and will be used up generating current.

The trick is to find a way to charge your cap from a limitless 'free' energy source.




Clarky

If this potentially works is it because your stopping the 50% of the flow from destroying the dipole moment? as I understand it in a conventional circuit half the energy from the battery is always utilised in the load because the other half is needed to carry the flow back round to the dipole, effectively destroying anything above COP 0.5