Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Motor test - input appreciated.

Started by Mi, April 21, 2006, 07:59:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Clarky

There is no question about it, Brady uses the repulsion, their site even says so. I can only imagine that the best way to reduce eddy currents for longevity would be to have the magnets well within their load threshold and use magnets with a relatively high gauss level. The shielding may also reduce eddy currents as it would constrict the approaching parts of the field preventing them from reacting as strongly over the same distance, so the overall build up would be diminished significantly if each magnet has a smaller focused area of interaction.

The angles, the tri rotor offset of half a magnet, and shielding (mu-metal inserts on the approaching sides) seem critical, it all seems to be set up in such a way as to tip the balance so the direct initial repulsion of one magnet in the rotor pressures the next magnet in the offset to pass the parrallel point of the next stator magnet, concluding in a repeat to the next.. locking it into an asymmetric interaction.

Mi

I totally agree.
The method i am using, is to divide the stator in 3 separate parts, overlapping by half a magnet each stator part. (Thus i dont have to make 3 stator- and rotor-parts). Granted, mine will give much less torque because of this - but it is a toy, and proof-of-concept, only.

Update on my replication:
- i got non-attracting stainless screws to hold the magnets
- i got metal plates to attach atop magnets on rotor, to separate with thin plastic sheet, producing frontal shielding, and some initial attraction to upcoming stator magnet.

Not much time, as other projects, family and a 5-day out-of-town trip is "in the way" ;)

BTW: The assymetrical interaction, over-riding the repellation, is a "loose-some - gain-some" situation. This means the "net" output torque is much less than the total magnetism/energy in magnets. It would be so much better to get all the magnetism/energy to do an "un-interrupted job" - and possibly others have succeeded/come closer to this, but it seems they always use electricity/electromagnetism to overcome the lock-up.

I still follow the www.befreetech.com project a lot - they just had meetings/demonstrations in Cleveland and Chicago - anybody know how they went?

Jdo300

Hi Mi,

It looks like your motor design is just like the Tri-Phase motor project that I have been working on for some time here: www.fdp.nu/perendev.

That design can work buf if you go with the all repeling design, you will need to design the shielding to cut down the repelling field on one side of the magnets. Not to say it is impossible to get working without them but it will be worlds harder to tune. I have a prototype that I have been playing around with for some time but I have yet to get it to run in repulsion mode. If you can't get yours to work, you may consider using magets at 90 degrees as I proposed in my article the 90 Degree rule Theory here www.fdp.nu/free_energy.asp?book=90.

God Bless,
Jason O