Do you see what I see???

[wattsup]

Hi Raj,

Thanks for your answers.  I wonder what is your take on the diameter ratio of the wheels?  I 'feel' the small wheel may have a maximum OD of half of that of the big wheel.   
rgds,  Gyula

The bigger the inside wheel the more "field tear time" you will have to overcome. The small wheel assures mutual field contact and quick field tearing action to get it out of the way and into the next cycle. But the actual final center wheel diameter may require fine tuning so that inside wheel is better to have adjustable magnets and adjustable center axle positioning, otherwise you may run into a checkmate condition from the start.

I love these ideas. They are so relaxing to the mind compared to our other works.

[AB Hammer]

Raj Balkee

At first glance I could see what you are trying to do. But as you have it, it will not work for it will skip and find an equilibrium. I am highly experienced at this approach.

The first major change is you have to have each wheel geared and your spacing has to work with the gear ratio of the wheels. also you will have to have a top wheel added to keep it from jumping due to the magnetic fields.

I did a quick drawing of one of mine but took out what else I was doing. If you add your idea to mine. Between the two of us we might have a running magnet wheel. But will it be real strong? I doubt it, but it might be strong enough.

Alan Bauldree

[gyulasun]

....
But as you have it, it will not work for it will skip and find an equilibrium.
...

Hi Alan,

I also think it can skip, mainly when you wish to use its torque for something useful but I do not think this is a reason for finding equlibrium: in fact all the sticky points in Raj's setup are overridden by neighbouring attract and repel forces so no equlibrium can happen. Of course the torque may be small but it should be steady when a small and stabile load is applied.

With your gear idea the skip can surely be eliminated (but with a decent flywheel it can also be kept at a minimum), however the gear system will surely consume some part of the useful torque just by its normal friction. 
And with gear, why equlibrium could not happen?

Respectfully,  Gyula

[AB Hammer]

Hi Alan,

I also think it can skip, mainly when you wish to use its torque for something useful but I do not think this is a reason for finding equlibrium: in fact all the sticky points in Raj's setup are overridden by neighbouring attract and repel forces so no equlibrium can happen. Of course the torque may be small but it should be steady when a small and stabile load is applied.

With your gear idea the skip can surely be eliminated (but with a decent flywheel it can also be kept at a minimum), however the gear system will surely consume some part of the useful torque just by its normal friction. 
And with gear, why equlibrium could not happen?

Respectfully,  Gyula

LOL Gyula

There is no guaranties, for if so, I would have already had a runner from this approach. I just never added magnets to it. So if it is going to be tried lets try to work out the bugs first. Then we can try it.

Raj Balkee
What do you think? by the way I like the last name for Balkee, it is allot like mine Bauldree. 

[FreeEnergy]

im not sure about this, but you never know.