Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Working Air Battery

Started by lasersaber, June 08, 2010, 11:39:33 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

jeanna

@MK1,
It seems a good idea, but I still only get 1.74v
carbon//separator/copper/aluminum//separator/magnesium
The potential difference remains the same.
I am getting 3.6mA which, considering the short length of each part, seems to to be quite high, so this might give a mA boost. It is more materials

===
I keep trying to make carbon in a different place and also tried by mistake:

carbon//separator/aluminum/copper//separator/magnesium
so it kind of zig zagged the galvanic chart, and brought the results down on both volts and amps.
This time I got 1.6v and 1.8mA

So much for the thought that more materials brought me more mA  ;)

I hope I am following what you are saying!

jeanna

Mk1

@jeanna

This is strange it will not work like a voltaic pile either  ???

I believe you did it right .

But you wroth carbon//separator/copper/aluminum//separator/magnesium

  copper and aluminum are in the wrong order , the idea is 2 battery one between the magnesium and copper and one between the carbon and aluminum , but i am beginning to see that if you don't use the same pair it will not add up . It loses .5 volts between copper and aluminum .

Mk1

@all

The separator makes a huge difference in the results .

I made a battery a good month ago , from 2 wires copper and aluminum .

i used a dress shirt material , very thin cotton and it is still working bone dry for weeks .

Mark

Mk1

@All

Pictures of the wire battery , the volts are still really high , the amps are real low 35 micro amp rises to 3.5 miliamp when wet , but the design is the problem here .


jeanna

Quote from: Mk1 on July 21, 2010, 08:30:48 PM
@jeanna

This is strange it will not work like a voltaic pile either  ???

I believe you did it right .

But you wrote carbon//separator/copper/aluminum//separator/magnesium

  copper and aluminum are in the wrong order , the idea is 2 battery one between the magnesium and copper and one between the carbon and aluminum , but i am beginning to see that if you don't use the same pair it will not add up . It loses .5 volts between copper and aluminum .

Actually, I did it both ways and the one in the order you copied, and say is wrong,  is the one that seemed to have higher v and mA to it.
This is really small and hard to work, almost  like your wire in that way.

The concept is interesting, and I don't see why it doesn't work better.
I still think I am making a mistake, but, I cannot find it.
Maybe if I made a bigger one, it would last longer, or give some other improvement. And maybe it really does give more mA at less cost to the materials.


jeanna