A general perspective for scientific explanation of almost all overunity devices

[fritznien]

well said Tempest, i can and have built and repaired many things but i do not see a single thing here worth the effort.
you can explain in half a page and a couple pictures how to make a DC electric motor out of wire nails tape and a piece of board(done it in school) but nobody can explain an experiment to demonstrate OU in a hundred pages here with 20
utube clips.

[DrKCostas]

Ok here is my shortest answer to that.

1)   First I will never claim "this is my idea" on any device build by anyone based on my work either if I am aware of it or not.
Because my work had different original intention: To be published on one of the standard Academic Journals. At least due to its size but mainly due to its content this is not to happen.
At best I am still thinking that one day if I find energy and time,  I can condensed it from 70 pages to maybe to 5-10 pages and published it to a well accepted academic journal together with publication of quantitative measurements of am utterly simple experiment (e.g. based an unusual coil, or magnet pendulum etc) just to prove that the linear Maxwell equations must be corrected to non-linear. Scientists accept only beyond doubt quantitative measurements that can be  reproduced. In addition I cannot spend time and money or effort  more than the simplest possible experiment (that an idiot can understand too). As it will be so simple, I doubt I will need  anyone to make it for me. I will just go and buy the material and make and measure it. Even a laboratory will not be needed. But this will not be by far any free energy or overunity device to sell or use to save energy.


2)   About suggesting a free energy device that works, for you to build. I understand that it must be cheap and simple. I understand also that you want to build it because of the joy of observing and showing it! I doubt that it can be useful for you to make money or use it  to save energy. It would be not clever at the present state of the art of free energy to want anything but the amateur’s joy of observing it and thinking about the science of electricity.
Then the best candidate would be also the most primitive device of all that I know, that was also running successfully for at least 20 years. And that would be the Swiss Testatika of P. Baumann (died in 1999 by old age). During 1997-98 I had found a very-very detailed  diagram in the web of how to build one as a copy of smaller version of those that were using to power their monastery in Methernita. They say that after the death of P. Bauman the monastery does not have experts to continue running it, and they just keep them for history. I had found also sites of people that had made such generators from old musical vinyl disks and it was working.
For this device I would spend my little money and effort to make myself. I do not know if you can find after 10 years such  building instructions in the web, but you may try. Also you should be prepared to insist till you get the result. As far as I remember after 10 years the basic idea was two disc rotors, one with many metal rays for the centrifugation of electrons (the “heaven” as they were saying) and one with less (the “earth”). They were setting in rotation (e.g. 30 rot. per minute) both by a small electric engine, but they were rotating in opposite direction. Then they were collecting electric currents with “brushes” from the disc with the many metal rays. This was high voltage low ampere (non-alternating). current that they were converting it to standard voltage and Ampere. The extracted electricity was enough to support the little starting engine that now is used as stabiliser of the rotation, and also store the rest in battery to light bubbles etc. The other devices that I know are of thousands of rotations per minute use magnets instead of electrostatics and are expensive. You can find in the web images of testatika and possible videos. Maybe instructions too from amateurs that made it and it works.
But do not try to answer me with objections (I know some people they tried and its does not work etc) I will not believe you.

[DrKCostas]

This discussion topic is not to give instructions for any OU device to make. You are looking in the wrong place.
The links with my theoretical work in my 1st post are put here with the intention of possibly inspiring innovators and inventors in their own work.
If they are inspired good. If the ideas mean nothing to them (no bell rings in them) it is again OK.I am not interested personally in any prize for OU, and for the last 5 years I work intensively in Management and Finance. I changed specialisation.  I simply keep a look in the state of the art of free energy devices as a hobby, and I just though that putting a post to link my work might be of help to some, and avoid the repetition of old mistakes of researchers. I do it for the sake of rationality. First think then create and manufacture. This is the main point with the internet: surplus creative work solves problems.
Do not undermine it.

[conradelektro]

My humble opinion about "overunity devices" and whether one can build them easily.

Let's consider two very interesting technologies that appeared recently:

http://www.blacklightpower.com/ (special gray powder)
http://www.bloomenergy.com (very special chemical as catalyst, very special chemical compounds in the plates)

(Disregarding whether they are overunity or not) it would be extremely difficult to replicate these two technologies. Very special equipment and special manufacturing capabilities are necessary to produce and to use the necessary chemical compounds.

Let's consider as third example a modern transistor. It is almost impossible without very high tech machines to alter a transistor or to build a slightly different one.

From all three examples we can deduce, that it will not be easy to replicate a future overunity or even not overunity technology.

So, the hopes of many people in this forum will probably have to be abandoned. It will not be easy to build and it will not be described in a few videos or publications. A deep understanding of certain known technologies and of at least one completely unknown technology will be necessary (and very special equipment and very difficult to obtain materials and chemicals).

I also suspect (like Dr. Kyritsis), that the answer to future overunity technologies (or to any new technologies) lies beyond or behind the particles which we know today.

Some call it "the fabric of space", which we yet have to discover. The particles we know (and which are taught at the universities today) "swim" in some unknown substance which we yet have to understand. And it can well be that we need a totally new world view (may be without all these particles) to describe it.

And once we understand a bit what lies between everything, we can may be derive new ways to produce energy. Or better said, we might find new ways to "harvest" energy.

In my world view one does not produce energy, one takes it from somewhere. And we might find new places in-between all things known today (in the fabric of space) from where we can take energy.

But all this said, I still think that this forum (overunity.com) offers interesting things, even when they do not work. My attention was drawn to many things which I did not know before. Of course, I also saw a lot of mental sickness, which I have not seen before. But all things together, I am always learning a lot. May be there are better ways to learn about new (and known) things, but I have not found a more entertaining one. Interacting with other people is more entertaining than reading books.

Greetings, Conrad

[fritznien]

@conradelektro i think you would be surprised what can be done in a small lab or workshop with off the shelf tech.
the transistor was invented in 1920. semi conductors have been used for over a hundred years. the problem we have is nobody can explain the basic principals of operation for an OU device. lots and lots of words that mean nothing,
or that mean something only the author understands.
drk you talk a lot but say little. the Testatika looks neither simple easy or complete to me. invented 20 years ago and all they do is sell videos. if this is a good idea i want nothing to do with anything bad.
fritznien