Magnet Motor from Argentina, part2

[madmaxx]

A wobble crank is a wavy disc. Place a bearing on the end of each stator magnet so that it touches the cam. Retain the magents in a slot instead of by hinge so that they can move vertical only.

It seems to have plenty of force to lift the stators since I doubled the magnets.

But the problem is putting the stator back down. This is the dead spot. There is very little energy to move another cam to put the stator down so that it lifts the next position. The force need to lift isn't much, but the  force need to put down is. Once the stator lifts there is only inertia to move the rotor. This inertia is not enough to put the previous stator back.

At least my 2 year old likes to play with it.

[NerzhDishual]

Salve a tutti
Hello everybody

Thanks for your replies.

Thanks also to Madmaxx for his video (and HartiBerlin for the conversion into AVI).
Sounds promissing to me.
Working with magnets is very very tricky. Is it not? You can not get two identical magnets. Can you?

BTW, I'm reading:

torbay_test.avi (1072.92 KB - downloaded 17 times.)

17 times only?
Is the motivation slowing down?

Best

[smarthousesys]

Madmaxx noted your excellent video - though isnt the Torbay priciple to raise the leading magets rather than to lower the trailing ones?

[gn0stik]

Madmaxx noted your excellent video - though isnt the Torbay priciple to raise the leading magets rather than to lower the trailing ones?

The motor works by repulsion. Lowering the trailing magnet forces a repulsion condition, and moves the stator forward one magnet which forces the next (leading) magnet up. Creating an imbalance that the rotor has to rectify.

So, in short, no.. lifting the leading magnet helps to create the imbalance but it is more to avoid cogging that it is lifted. The rotor magnet in this way sort of rides a magnetic wave like a surfer does. It has a repulsion behind it, and nothing in front of it, to hinder rotation.

[NerzhDishual]

Hi Smart_House_Sys

I see what you mean.

Is it not a mere "matter of principle" ?

If nothing in the misnomed "stator" is changing (moving up, down or away) the rotor miserably stalls. Should the "variation" be before of after. What is the difference? "moving-principle-wise"?

One of the way to get "something changing" is to use an electro-magnet.
That leads to infinite discussions about measuring. Does it not?


"So For ME" (this expression is patend pending  )
= Sorry For My English
= I whish I could be more accurate, but my English explanations are lacking.

Best