Chalkalis Gravity Wheel

[w32]

Dear Knovos,
Since you are following the F.M.Chalkalis thread, you must already know I am a supporter, because I honestly believe it can change our world. Unfortunately I do not have the ability to build a copy myself.
Reading your post:

No serious replications yet seen on this forum. The design of Mr. Chalkalis is probable to big for most of us, but why not trying to replicate it on a smaller scale ?!. You can get all his drawings on his blog http://chalkalis.blogspot.com/
I'm going to try to replicate his device using his specifications, as much as possible, for the materials I have available. I am sick and tired of all the thoughts and math discussions, mixing it sometimes with other devices. Lets build the damn thing and see what comes out. Then we have something to discuss. So, now you all can sit back and wait for me. If I fail, I will accept the title 'loser' no problem.

I would like to add that:
As long it concerns smaller scale devices (smaller weights), you should read of Mr.Chalkalis ‘s advices on the mater.
Concerning the possibility you may be called a “loser” as you say, I would like to encourage you that if you follow the instructions and specifications firmly it would be impossible to fail.
Even more, if you google it you will find that there are confirmations from Universities about Mr. F.M.Chalkalis device functionality and even technical data tablet with COP based on the prototype.
I have been studying this innovation for quite a time and I would be more than happy to contribute in your try with any help you might need.
The responsibility of proving that the F.M.Chalkalis device can be successfully copied is of great importance and I do wish you lots of strength.
PS.: You should build an enchased base and underpinned foundations because the forces are huge.

My Best Wishes
W32

[knovos]

Dear W32,

Thank you very much for your encouragement. Yes I know you are a big fan of mister Chalkalis his device. And yes, I have read as much as I can about all the information for building this device. This evening I made a start by making the first drawing for the smaller scale replication. I decided to make a replication that is 25% from the original. My first concerns are how to make two weights each 5711 gram and the motors that I want to use, maybe they are not strong enough. But that are problems that can be solved I'm sure. This device is really simple to build but it must be accurate in the dimensions. Yes the forces will be huge so maybe thats the reason why Mr.Chalkalis did not used bearings. Bearings are no problem I think as long as they are build for the forces. I really don't understand why there are no serious replications yet. Talk to you later.
Kind regards,
Knovos.

[JEJEHO]

Dear All,

Please note , Chalkalis wheel cannot do big work. Because When the weights are falling down, due to the weights  are loosing there energy , the wheel can do a work. But when the weights are going up it cannot do the same work, becasue of the weights are gaining there  energy. so when it is connected to a generator, when the weights are falling down it can run the generator but when the weights are going up it cant.

Nixon

[ae_vector]

I might attempt to replicate a small scaled version of this (32.9%). Here is a screenshot of the spreadsheet I made calculating the power a scaled version can put out. You can change the parameters, like diameter of the device, rotational speed, weight on the device. The changeable parameters are highlighted yellow.

As you can see, at 60 rpm, the device will produce 33 watts with a 7 lbs combined weight. The scaled diameter of the device in the example is 29 inches, which is roughly the size of a large bike wheel and it is 32.9% (scale ratio) the size of the original. At higher rpms, weights, and diameters, it will obviously produce more power.

If we can rotate this device using only 10 watts at 60 rpm and take out only a fraction of the 33 watts, say 11 watts, then we may have a winner.

-brian

[knovos]

If we can rotate this device using only 10 watts at 60 rpm and take out only a fraction of the 33 watts, say 11 watts, then we may have a winner.

-brian

Thank you very much for your contribution. I can't wait for the results. I certainly going to use this excel sheet to check if the device that I build fits into these numbers. For those who are interested in the building of my device look at http://knovos-chalkalisreplication.blogspot.com/
knovos