Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Qwert]

Here is free access. I don't know if the document is complete; it's only 51 pages pdf.
http://nwolibrary.com/nwolibrary/item/721-mag-current

[nievesoliveras]

Thank you @rosemary
Thank you @elisha
Thank you @qwert

Jesus

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi everyone.  I just want to alert you all to the thread in this forum

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9479.msg250797#new

It's brilliant.  Clear - well illustrated - very articulate.  Well worth the read.  I think we should leave these riddles to Mark.  It's looking very promising.  Let's hope he solves this.

What I would like to say though is that I've had more time now to study his writing.  I think he's trying to show us how he influenced the weight of those stones.  I still want to study it in more depth.  He definitely draws a distinction between the two poles - which effectively means that the saw the 'north' 'south' acting independently of each other.  In all other aspects I absolutely concur with his ideas here.  Amazing.  Tishatang told me about Leedskalnin - in the early chapters of my joining these forums.  I should have paid better attention.  I also think he transferred the energy through the air or possibly through the ground.  Very interesting.  But worrisome that he contracted cancer.  I'm concerned that there may be some connection.  In any event.  I am satisfied that he understood exactly how to release matter from a gravitational grip.  Antigravity?  Probably.  Certainly that's what I'm beginning to realise.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello Fritz,

I have just read through your posts and I think I've been unduly 'sensitive'.  Your suggestions are, in fact, aimed at proposing that we check and double check where the effect actually emanates.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with this - and in the light of good scientific practice - it's actually to be commended. 

I must apologise for the rather irrelevant departure and trust you'll understand it.  You are right in every particular.  I rather took exception to your declared doubt on the 'miracle' effect which I repeatedly claim is NO miracle.  But that aside.  I am actually downloading your suggestions and using the most of them as a guide to our own testing procedures.  The difference being that it will be tested on the appliance as opposed to the smaller experimental apparatus that really has very little practical use.

Kindest regards
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And Guys,  Just a new development that I thought I'd alert you to.

Our circuit thread was the fastest growing thread on EF.Com ever.  Aaron was under some pressure to advertise this popularity.  He eventually compromised by referencing it in the 20 most 'read' threads with it's own link.  A sort of means to both hide it and yet appear to give it the distinction of being a 'sticky'.  Now he's lost that reference.  Effectively there is NO FURTHER REFERENCE TO THAT COP>17 AINSLIE CIRCUIT thread.  LOL.  It's been tumbled into extinction through the happy excuse of banning me for making the following statement. 

"If anyone assumes to understand Leedskalnin's work - he must first be capable of duplicating the miracle of Coral Castle"   This in reference to Harvey Gramm's post where he implied that he understood EVERYTHING that Leedskalnin had written.

The position now is this.  My name as associated with that circuit technology is buried.  And the only reference to that circuit is called 'the mosfet heating circuit'.  It's in pride of place on every page of that thread - and it HAS ABSOLUTELY NO REFERENCE TO MY PART IN THAT CIRCUIT.  Not only that but it's purpose is to DENY the very benefits that BOTH HARVEY GRAMM AND GLEN LETTENMAIER earlier attested to.   

Work it out for yourselves.  EF.COM is definitely NOT promoting clean green.  It's become a sort of incestuous gathering of the clans where unwitting experimentalists and theorists are seduced into sharing their knowledge to then simply have it stolen from them.  I'm still awaiting word from Scribd regarding my rights to publish emails.  This shocking series of communications will show the character of those 'so called' clean green energy enthusiasts.  I see it as morally imperative that their true nature be fully and publicly disclosed.   As soon as I know the legal status I'll either publish those emails there - or if stefan will allow it - somewhere on his forum.  And while there is absolutely no point in suing either Harvey or Glen as they are both pretty impoverished - it would be very much in my interests to sue Microsoft and the owners of EF.COM - Microsoft for allowing Glen the space to publish his files where the technology is again recorded without any reference to its source.  And EF.COM for appropriating ownership of my technology in conjunction with two of what, in my opinion, are the biggest scoundrels that have ever stalked these forums.  Again it is my opinion that they are ALL self-serving - and are appropriating to themselves the knowledge that I have ONLY intended as free for Open Source.  And DOUBLY worisome - is the fact that they are PUBLICLY DENYING the benefits.  Yet they appear to be forging ahead with experiments.  WHY? 

I hope you all see what's happening there. 

Regards
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33937867/IF-I-WAS-A-TROLL