Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Rosemary Ainslie]

indeed. my apologies for sussing out the links.

LOL  It's not a problem.  I have easy access to him and can get this matter resolved.  But I see now that I may also have to warn Tapsen.  I'll simply suggest that they ignore the email unless Ominibus sends a follow up with the appropriate questions. 

In any event, unless Omnibus has disclosed his actual name then they will ignore the emails as 'noise'.  They're well used to such.  It's also more than likely that the university will filter out the email entirely unless he's got a full signature there.

Take care of yourself Wilby. 
Kindest regards,
Rosie

EDITED. And frankly I think that it's highly unlikely that our learned and revered will answer an email addressed to koooyyy@hotmail.com.  It seems somewhat irreverend.  LOL.  Omnibus advises us widely that he's an academic.  I'd quite like to see his credentials - quite frankly.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

P.S. My e-mail address is koooyyy@hotmail.com

Send me an email to my address with your name attached to that email and I may yet take the trouble to forward you the pdf.  I would also first require you to correct that mishmash of misinformation you managed to convey to Professor Gaunt and also, possibly to Professor Tapsen.

[Omnibus]

No, no. I'm not asking him whether he attended a demonstration or not. Neither did I ask him as to whether he approved of protocols, whatever that means. I'm asking him if he did confirm independently the claims for the energy disbalance. That's the only thing I'm interested in -- independent confirmation of the discussed energy disbalance. Nothing short of it.

[Omnibus]

Send me an email to my address with your name attached to that email and I may yet take the trouble to forward you the pdf.  I would also first require you to correct that mishmash of misinformation you managed to convey to Professor Gaunt and also, possibly to Professor Tapsen.

What mishmash that might be?

[WilbyInebriated]

No, no. I'm not asking him whether he attended a demonstration or not. Neither did I ask him as to whether he approved of protocols, whatever that means. I'm asking him if he did confirm independently the claims for the energy disbalance. That's the only thing I'm interested in -- independent confirmation of the discussed energy disbalance. Nothing short of it.

holy tu stultus es batman!
rosemary has previously indicated neither gault nor tapson confirmed any claim. see below.

This is a different issue.  If I based my measurements of proof on transients then I would not have sufficient proof.  Our measurements were empirical and the protocols stipulated by experts in the art.  The problem was that those same experts would NOT attend a demonstration - lest they were then required to accredit those results.  I really don't AGAIN want to detail that protocol.  It's all clearly defined in two papers.  This is EXHAUSTING me Omnibus.  Have pity.

Regards,
Rosemary

i bolded the relevant parts for you so they don't elude you again omni.