Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

[Mk1]

"The reason I call the results of North and South Pole magnet's
functions magnetic currents and not electric currents or electricity is the electricity is connected too much with those non-existing electrons. If it had been called magneticity then I would accept it. Magneticity would indicate that it has a magnetic base and so it would be all right." Ed. L

It's pretty clear yes?
Magnetic current IS electric current.
When the individual magnets enter the coil they are in bulk form....the coils job is to divide the magnets into small path's....that is your electricity. 

Let me show it again.
If you have a copper wire in an E/W position with pos current entering from the East and neg from the West, then a  magnetic needle hung above the copper wire, with it's N pole at the lower end, will be deflected to the North.
If the S pole of the needle is above the copper wire it is deflected South.

Now Ed wrote "The hanging magnets that hang up and down, they show that there is motion inside the bar.  Hold the perpetual motion holder North Pole magnet or pole end East and South Pole magnet terminal or pole end West, now raise it up slowly to the South Pole hanging magnet, then you will see the South Pole hanging magnet swinging South. Now put the perpetual motion holder under the North Pole hanging magnet, raise up slowly, then you will see the North Pole hanging magnet swinging North.  This experiment shows without any doubt that the North and South Pole individual magnets are running in the same direction as those in the copper wire, which came out of the car battery, and in both instances while the magnets are running ahead in whirling motion they used the right-hand twist."

So, again everything is clear yes?
BTW, I think only a good "wrought iron" will show the results.
Wrought iron has a laminated structure so it throws out the magnets much more.

Scotty.

Its clear to me that i am wasting me time with most of you guys , since you all know everything , yet no one ever showed how Ed did it .

Having there mind set , is the same as knowing everything .

It should be quite easy for people that understand everything ...

Why should even bother to show you guys , you are not even thinking about what i am saying .

I would accept debate , but that shit is sad .

Totally ignoring , no comment , no open lines of discussion .

You all had the clues for so long , but dismiss it , because you don't feel comfortable reevaluating there mind set , those are the fruits that rot  .

This is the kind of things that make one stop sharing .

Good luck , with your experiment ...

Mark



 

[IotaYodi]

NS coil is a transmitter

Yes it is and its also a receiver. It puts out magnetic pulses at low frequencies which is disruptive.

There are 2 forces making the wheel turn gravity and magnetism .

Sorry you can't see that.

I see it but in a different manner. I think there are 3 forces. The gravitational spin of the earth forcing telluric currents through the earths magnetic field. This is what I meant by Ed charging up for a continuous flow like a PMH. The Pmh is just a magnet until current is applied to the coils. Once the keeper is put on the current keeps flowing because there is no output and it stays in the loop until the keeper is removed. Eds wheel to me looks like a magnetic vortex,thus the pendulum,that is carrying the earths telluric currents through the iron chains just like the current induced into a Pmh by an external force instead of gravity. In other words gravity is the voltage or force.

[scotty1]

Mark, I only quoted Ed's words so they can be easily understood.
Why that would be offensive to you is a mystery.
You ask why nobody can show how Ed did it...did what? lift stones, overcome Lenz?

I don't care what Ed did. I care about the theory of magnets he wrote and published.
By learning it I might see what Ed did and that would be great.
To learn something it is useless to start by changing everything related to the subject.

If I can bring someone's "Ed theory" into contradiction by using Ed's own words then I have little faith in that theory for obvious reasons.

I have an ability to discern words but not such an ability with invention and utilisation of understanding...such is life.
If more people actually took Ed for what he wrote then somebody who has inventive ability might see what I have not yet found.

Scotty.

[scotty1]

Here is a music scale.
A B C D E F G.

How many people can make an opera from it?
We can all see it but to utilise it takes another form of understanding, even though what is seen is plain to the eye.

Scotty.

[david lambright]

hi...just to let you know, matt emery has my device finally...as far as Eds wheel and what it makes...magnetic current is different than electric current...it follows some of the same rules but it is different...the devices i have made clearly show this...Eds wheel is nothing more than a large circular PMH....NOT an electrical generator....magnetic current is a flowing field......it is absolutely visible and can be seen flowing from a PMH.....to understand it you must first SEE what i am talking about...this is a post from another forum                screaminvern
Advanced Member




USA
369 Posts
Posted - 02/11/2010 :  10:45:03 PM       
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't despair Ron, when you see it,you'll know it  You'll say, "Ohhhh... that's what their talking about!"

I was walking by my wheel day before yesterday, picked up the geode and there it was.

It was a long time before I was able to detect the waves.

"caveman at a Tesla convention"