GEM = General Energy Multiplier

[Tito L. Oracion]

it seems that a rat is pulling an elephant, well maybe if the elephant is on a very slippery surface or on top of an ice, though starting is very hard. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us-X_sE3pLM&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PLAA70705D19CAD2DE


or if you can make it something like this => http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5ba0DhRhIk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFKNkFh8Sho&feature=relmfu

BEAT THE FRICTION FIRST
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Imiq5z5faw&feature=relmfu


or you have to modify your coil in the generator in the sense that every shifting or pulse must produce double or more energy generated, and that is what really required in this setup.  AND THAT IS POSSIBLE!. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSd5fmQ9X9s&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syheCHxG6p8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVWVMrzQrOM&feature=fvwrel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHYMhzcmlSY&feature=related

SEE THERE IS ALWAYS A PERFECT WAY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXC9fgGYWf0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWHpcKXt-qQ&feature=related

[Earl]

this thread is absolute total nonsense.  There are a lot of uneducated, crackpot ideas, but this beats them all.  If you believe this, you will believe a free energy car with a 50kW motor being driven down the road by means of a 100 kW generator turned by the rear wheels.

[Tito L. Oracion]

If you believe this, you will believe a free energy car with a 50kW motor being driven down the road by means of a 100 kW generator turned by the rear wheels.

Ya, its possible Tesla did it already remember? 

[qbjorn]

I agree that this subject is pure nonsense written by a crackpot.
Sorry, but if you start mixing pseudo-science with God you'll be considered a Crackpot!

But one thing applies to most if not all who reads this thread - how do we know this?
Sure, we know the physics & math and we know that all mechanical systems are lossy, but has anyone actually tried what he suggests to see that it doesn't work?
The first thing I thought when I read this thread was "Crackpot", but then I realized that I actually never tried what he suggest and that I only 'know' that it won't work.
I'm very certain that it WON'T work and I won't try it (but I will try some other stuff in other threads), but I think too many of us are too quick to summarily dismiss an idea without actually trying it for themselves or even considering it since 'common knowledge' says that it won't work.

With such an attitude no inventions would ever be made!
Just look at the things Bedini has shown, common sense says that they won't work, but somehow they do it anyway.
However, this won't be the breakthrough idea...

So considering everything, thank you for making me re-evaluate my own view on what's possible!

[e2matrix]

I would agree that at first this seems like nonsense.  However a couple things make me question if some forces are coming into play that we don't yet see.  There is a discussion just started today on energeticforum.com that has some close similarities and it even has some notable persons like Peter Lindemann saying this that this is one of the MOST IMPORTANT concepts that can be explored (Force multiplier) and Lindemann is not easily fooled with all the years he has put into his research.  This relates to an invention by a Peruvian man which has apparently been checked by government officials there.  See this thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/11282-awarded-machine-multiply-force-motor-free-energy.html

There are other things I've come across over the years too.  One was a device I saw on eBay many years ago claiming to generate more power than it used.  I almost bid on it but decided it couldn't be that easy.  It involved 5 alternators run by one motor and started with a battery.  I later contacted the winner of the device to ask him if it really worked.  He said it was working as stated so far.  I lost contact with him after that or I would have asked more.  Another device that comes to mind is the Chas Campbell device which is in Patrick Kelly's Energy guide.  I don't know that anyone has disproven it although I know some say it can't work.  The fact that Chas says it works and isn't looking for money leaves me to wonder about that one too.  There is also the Jim Watson motor/flywheel that Bedini told him how to build which was demonstrated at an energy conference in the 80's.  The result of that in Bedini's words: "Jim got paid off I got pushed against the wall and told to buy gasoline the rest of My life" (spelling corrected).   

    Yet another recent motor generator thread with someone who said they had a working device and were willing to demonstrate it in front of anyone went suddenly silent when he simply disappeared with the words ' my calculations were wrong'.   I sent a PM to him while he was still online asking if he had been threatened, if it was really incorrect calcs or whatever circumstance caused the sudden change.   Never got a reply. 

   Knowledge of basic physics would tell me this setup cannot work.  However given the things I've mentioned and knowing how extensive suppression of knowledge has been if I had the money or parts to try it I would certainly do so because I think there are enough hints that something else might be coming into play in such a setup.   Are we are missing a well hidden secret that physics has not yet found or that has been suppressed ?