What is over unity?

[Omnibus]

Overunity, if you really mean it, implies that either part or the entire amount of the produced energy has come from no pre-existing energy source. I said energy source but it doesn't mean the energy has come out of nothing because it definitely has come out of other physical components (other than energy). Say, the produced energy source may have come out due to the spontaneous displacement under the action of a force. Force isn't energy and yet when there are conditions for spontaneous displacement what is produced is work (energy).

[Omnibus]

I have NEVER stated that OU is the result a single supply source.  I have only claimed that OU is the result of the latent energy in the resistor that is somehow potentialised by the current that first flowed through it.  In other words the resistor itself becomes an energy supply source.  Strictly speaking my predictions conform to classical requirements more stringently than is even required by you electrical and chemical engineers.

If that's the case then it isn't OU and presents no interest. That would be trivial.

Let alone that there is no such thing as latent energy in the resistor.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Overunity, if you really mean it, implies that either part or the entire amount of the produced energy has come from no pre-existing energy source. I said energy source but it doesn't mean the energy has come out of nothing because it definitely has come out of other physical components (other than energy).

Say, the produced energy source may have come out due to the spontaneous displacement under the action of a force. Force isn't energy and yet when there are conditions for spontaneous displacement what is produced is work (energy).

You're losing me Omnibus.  Over Unity relies on the measure of more energy being dissipated at a circuit than is delivered by an energy supply source.  There is no known 'FORCE OF DISPLACEMENT' that I have ever learned about.  The forces relate to electromagnetic forces, gravity and the strong and weak nuclear force. These are known and accepted by mainstream.  What is not yet acknowledged or understood is the force from Dark matter resulting in Dark energy.  That is yet to be incorporated.  I know of no other forces.  Not anywhere.

[Low-Q]

The above is obviously an opinion and you should restrain from further pushing it in this way trying to make it look as truth. You may repeat it 100 times but it will still remain an opinion.

No, it's not an opinion. It's the truth as long you haven't been able to prove anything yet. When it comes to you, I know it doesn't help to repeat this 100 times, because you have already decided that you're right, and are too scared to rethink your "prove of over unity". I know you are wrong, and that is good enough for me, but I find it very refreshing to argue with you once in a while

Vidar

[Rosemary Ainslie]

If that's the case then it isn't OU and presents no interest. That would be trivial.

Let alone that there is no such thing as latent energy in the resistor.

If there was no latent energy in the resistor then E would NOT equal MC^2.  Are you proposing the Mass does not have energy?  That would be a really exotic branch of physics to develop.