a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi again Guys,

I just want to post the following link which - surprisingly - or not, is very much about what Dave's rig is showing us - I think.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeUgDJc6AWE

You will notice that Hutchinson talks about the Casimir effect and the 'jitter' that he thinks is accessed through Tesla type radiation application techniques.  He also proposes that this may be a different 'dimensional' effect which starts effecting the actual atomic structures.  I am absolutely not qualified to comment - but this is what intrigues me.  Metal softens without heating.  The bonding can be so compromised that that the material shape degrades to dust.  The lattice structure of aluminium turns to 'spaghetti like' strings.  Non metallic materials are shifted and levitated.  All very strange.

What I'm trying to determine is whether - indeed - it is some extraneous field - holding bonded atoms together.  I actually need a one dimensional orbiting string of dipolar particles - that will then be able to neutralise the 'environment' of atoms, so to speak.  In other words - two strongly opposing or 'like' charged atoms would, theoretically, be able to interact with such a field to enable them to share the same space.  Else - in many instances - it would be impossible to amalgamate material structures where their intrinsic charges are repellent.  Effectively, it would explain 'bonding' more easily and, believe it or not - more simply.  But without that 'bonding' - without that extraneous field - I cannot see anything inside the atom itself that would always promote any kind of proximity - unless the atoms' charges were somehow sympathetic.  It may be the elusive 'glue to the universe' that our astrophysicists are looking for.

I believe that Dave's rig - or the Lambright effect - is our early clue which will unfold this field.  You will note in those videos that the atomic structures remain the same.  It is only the condition of their bonding that is varied.  And this is changed without the application of 'heat'.  I suspect that these fields are 're-arranged' or are 're-positioned' in space.  Effectively, under usual circumstances,  they reach a happy compromise with our earth's magnetic fields - which are smooth, or smoothish' and then this stable or 'rest state' is interrupted by these irradiating fields - that they lose that 'rest state'. 

I do hope this relevance is clear.  And I'm really hoping that some of what I'm trying to point to here is understood. 

Regards,
Rosemary

[sm0ky2]

i dont know wether to add this guy to the team,
or lock him in the lab and save him for later....
the one on the right is the FairField Vortex Drive

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@ Rose

have you found a way to "polarize" things, different from what Dave showed with the PMH / aluminum?

Hi Sm0ky,
Absolutely NOT. Everything I have found absolutely agrees with or is consistent with the Lambright Effect. They only thing that I have NOT found is that 'Lambright Glimmer'.  I've seen it in on Dave's videos but have not seen it on my own rig.

What I'm trying to do - somewhat ponderously, so you guys must please bear with me - is the ACTUAL magnetic configuration.  My thinking here is becoming 'modified' or 'refined'.  I now see an attractive AND repulsive force in a magnetic field - and it's an alignment of this that seems to induce that strong magnetic interaction with non-magnetisable materials.  But I'm working with magnets.  The only effects I'll be able to achieve are really localised.  The advantage of using 'spins' and 'induced fields' such as Dave and even Hutchinson get - is that the 'field effect' is less localised.  I'm just doing some exercises in magnetic configurations that I fondly think may be required and appropriate.  It's fundamental forces we're dealing with.  And I'm trying to find those roots.  LOL

Kindest regards,
Rosemary 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

i dont know wether to add this guy to the team,
or lock him in the lab and save him for later....
the one on the right is the FairField Vortex Drive

Sm0ky - Very interesting indeed.  It's my experience that one can 'neutralise' any magnetic field with the use of conductive material.  I'm assuming that those bearings are paramagnetic?  But that construct is SO SYMMETRICAL.  Very intriguing.

Rosemary 

[sm0ky2]

@ rose
i tried to draw this out for you
when you alter the interaction between the nucleii and the electrons, by changing their orbital vector,
you essentially are changing the way each atom interacts with the one its adjoined to.

where they "share" orbital path components, is where they "bond".

if the paths change, so does the bonds.

hope this helps. the picture in the middle is my atomic description of magnetism.