a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[cletushowell]

In fact you got me so upset im going go hang out with the devil
the 666 just because hes like the only one on
my level 47 is nimrod
nimrod is m rodin marco rodin
dads a nuclear scientist and hes the second smartest man on earth
to me but you cant see those that have a ear let them hear
those that have a eye let them see
gravity = frequency magetism temperature

[sm0ky2]

Cletus may be a step above us in the evolutionary ladder.
He uses concepts and terminology that seems foreign to us, but it is not to be laughed at.

every now and then he says some things that even my primitive mind can recognize... His pyramid is essentially the the same as mine, but it can be "flipped".
where-as mine stays the same polarity.
Ive done extensive research on the fairfield device, (TriForce and friends)
and there is certainly a magnetic vortex within.

If you look at how this fits into the larger picture Cletus is trying to paint, you really can't discard anything he has said, no matter how rediculous it may seem to those of us who do not understand.
If you look past his frantic synaptic hysteresis, and subsequent incohesive thought patterns. You will find some underlying knowledge that is very important, and very relevant to what we are doing here.

It's like a co-dependent relationship...
He feels the need to enlighten us with his knowledge,
Yet it is our inability to comprehend his thoughts that frustrates him...

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Cletus may be a step above us in the evolutionary ladder.
He uses concepts and terminology that seems foreign to us, but it is not to be laughed at.

every now and then he says some things that even my primitive mind can recognize... His pyramid is essentially the the same as mine, but it can be "flipped".
where-as mine stays the same polarity.
Ive done extensive research on the fairfield device, (TriForce and friends)
and there is certainly a magnetic vortex within.

If you look at how this fits into the larger picture Cletus is trying to paint, you really can't discard anything he has said, no matter how rediculous it may seem to those of us who do not understand.
If you look past his frantic synaptic hysteresis, and subsequent incohesive thought patterns. You will find some underlying knowledge that is very important, and very relevant to what we are doing here.

It's like a co-dependent relationship...
He feels the need to enlighten us with his knowledge,
Yet it is our inability to comprehend his thoughts that frustrates him...

Sm0ky - I have no quarrel with anyone's ideas.  But there has to be some kind of logic if it's to be understood.  I'm afraid with the best will in the world I cannot see sequential logic in any of what he writes.  In fact it leaves me with my head spinning.  But I do find a certain 'bleak' humour in his postings.  It shows me where I'm likely to go if I ever lost this rather tenuous grip I have on reality.  It's a scarey prospect. 

I get it that he's got some really deep problems.  I very much doubt that he's on the same level as an experimentalist as Hutchinson.  And I certainly don't see him as a new Einstein or anything like.  But like all eccentrics - which, no doubt is a condition we share on these forums - then he has his value - clearly.  For me, not so much.  But nor am I obliged to read his posts.  And I'm not sure that I have any rights to offend anyone.  So.  I'll go back to saying nothing.  Cletus.  Apologies for laughing.  It was a momentary lapse.  I had a 'fleeting' hope that I could FINALLY enjoy reading your writing.  On the whole I find them deeply disturbing and deeply disturbed.  It can't be fun for you.  And I acknowledge that you definitely know MUCH more than I could ever hope to learn.  Golly.  A 14 year old would beat me at a math quiz. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[sm0ky2]

@ Rose

i agree that at LEAST half of what he types doesnt make any sense..

but im begining to think that may just be because of my current perspective.

To get what hes saying, you must reduce everything into an arbitrary value within the matrix.
when you do this, the math becomes much simplier.
in fact, the only different between doing complex trig. and using simple 8th grade matrices
is:   Pi

It doesnt matter how you square the circle, the answer is the same, just + or - values.
Thats why matrices work so well.

Further, he reduces everything into their associated frequency response. So instead of a compound problem, with undefinable ( or predefined) components
You have a simplified problem,
the only component is frequency.

he completely loses me on the color wheel, i dont understand how these things relate, but im trying...

heres the squared circle. this is why there is no heiroglyph for "integration". Yet noone can argue that their math was not just as accurate as ours.

im seriously pondering how his "babysitters" will respond if i were to acquire him as an asset.

[sm0ky2]

For example::
if you triangulate the squared circle, square the resulting octagon, triangulate that square, square the axis
then circle the square.
You have effectively reduced its size to one third.
And what i just did in one sentence, would have taken a mathematician half a sheet of paper, and a whole lot more time.

But, if you were to just read that sentence, without me explaining this to you......
you would think im crazy, and have no clue about Pi, Radii, and the area of a circle. But as you can clearly see here, there are other ways to solve the problem than the commonly accepted model presented by physics.