a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[sm0ky2]

If we assume that magnetic radiation is a function of the change in energy levels of an electron, forced into a vectored elliptical orbit around the nucleus...

That would mean that the frequency of the radiation is (in close estimate) equal to the orbital frequency of the electron.
Which, if my calculations are correct for Iron(Fe)
would place this right around 281 Gigahertz.
   give or take variations in magnetic field intensity (mass dependent?)

thats somewhere between microwave and visible light.

the electric-charge vortex is a different effect than the radiation, more of the cause really... i dont know what effects this radiation might have on the human body, or objects placed into it.

i need to do some more research before i continue to experiment with this. I had a whole slue of tests lined up last night, to include numerous types of materials, lasers, electro-static discharge, temperature monitoring a suspended container of water in the field.

but what ended up happening, was i stared at it for a while, stuck my finger in it,. held various objects in the field and watched it stretch and flow towards them.
began a series of charged particle tests, then got spooked by the stuff. i didnt want it radiating around me, not knowing what it was.... so i took it down for now, until i learn more.

At this point my focus of study is going to be in the 281Ghz range
This is theorized off the Bohr atomic model, to be the frequency of a magnetic field, radiating from a magnetized iron atom.
Using a technique similar to the emision of lazer-light frequencies,
the "magnetron" uses the frequency of a ceramic-ferrite material to produce radiation in the microwave frequency range.

The Lambright Radiation, if it is indeed from the oscillations in the magnetic field itself, would be actually considered "microwaves", but approaching the edge of the scale to far-infrared light.
something we call "milimeter waves" (EHF), noted because of their wavelength. Interference patterns within the field could easily explain frequency-peaks exceeding the low end of the infrared scale, which would correlate with the type of visual effect we are observing. (magnetic diffraction?)

If this is the case, then this radiation would be relatively harmless to us. (may cause cancer in small laboratory animals) virtualy identicle to what we use for long-range microwave communications.
except that this is completely incoherent, being that its an interference pattern.


but , like i said im not entirely sure on this yet. so i'll need to learn more before i continue experimenting with it.

[sm0ky2]

there'd be a real simple test for this....

If you can get your hands on a PV-cell with low-iron glass
these are generally more expensive, but are known for their ability to pick up on, not only visible light, but also IR light as well.
these are called "high-efficiency cells", or full-spectrum cells
(even though they are only partial spectrum, because our ability to manufacture products makes it difficult to assemble a cell that captures the UV specrum)

or remove the cell from a calculator and swap the glass from an IR transmitter (rectualanger I-C chip), should be able to come up with two that are close to the same size. just swap the glass it should work fine.

If IR-radiation can be recieved from this device, it would prove this as a viable solid-state power source. Because, by definition, the PMH will sustain its magnetic current indefinately.

[david lambright]

hi everyone...i made another aluminum tube/oxide core ring but this time i put a coil of copper wire inside the tube before filling it with oxide...i drilled 2 small holes in the tube for the wires to come through ...after i energized it with a coil around the outside of the tube, i checked for voltage from the inner coil...it seems there is a small constant output....my meter is not very sensitive, but it looks like a very tiny constant flow of energy...this device is a fairly crude proto-type......the wave form that radiates from these devices is the same type that Tesla was seeing,the same that alex from EF saw...both of them saw this after high voltage, current etc.  Tesla noted gravitational effects in some of his tests....Brown also described gravitational effects....Leedskalnins generator is a PMH that is able to spin that visible distortion wave into a vortex, but without the high voltage that others have used.....i do not think the high voltage is necessary to get the gravitational effects that they describe.....david

[Low-Q]

I am very keen to see what these findings has to do with free energy. Is it a static field, or can it be harnessed to run something?
Interesting thread btw

Vidar

[sm0ky2]

there's an electric charge'flow through the center and back around the outside. the direction of magnetism determines wether it flows top to bottom, or bottom to top.

the way mine was set-up, a positively charged particle is sucked down into the center, like a toilet-bowl, swirling around.
then pushed back up around the outside. (see picture 1)

the radiation and this vortex are clearly two seperate effects.

it makes sense to me that a stationary coil would pick up a small degree of this action, but i think there are better ways to harness this.

the best logical solution, that agrees with the mathematics
is the propegation of the magnetic moment.
this generally only applies to "radioactive elements", but it appears in the case of a magnetic current loop, the ferromagnetic material becomes "radioactive".

look at picture 2 and 3, when the magnetic moment occurs at TDC, where its magnitude is the strongest, it sends vectored field of the north polarity in one direction.
1/2 a cycle later, it occurs at BDC, and sends the south field in the other direction.
Now, while this occurs locally relative to the atom,
to us, observing the entire mass simultaneously,... we observe the "wave" of magnetic moments occuring one, after another after another, in both directions. north and south. just like ED said. the apparent motion of the wave is caused by the delay in the material as the original magnetic current propegated through it to start the PMH loop. This locked the atoms in synch with one another, offset only by a fraction of the initial propegation delay

This is of course, only an "apparent wave". Its not actually flowing through the material. which solves my first problem.
       - the relativistic one
i think the second problem can explained by the input energy,
but it only works out if we assume the ideal superconductor.
the electrons have to be elevated into a higher energy state to set them in an oscilating eliptical orbit.

we observe this magnetic current in perpetual motion.
so, does that mean that the magnetic current, turns the metal into a "magnetic superconductor"?
or is it simply that magnetic current doesn't incurr resistance in the same way that electricity does? ( i may have decided on the 2nd choice as i type this)

but here,s my best visual representation to describe what im talking about here... notice that the propegation of the "imaginary wave" is in the same direction during both halves of the cycle.
but on the lower half, the direction of the magnetic force is negative, little mind boggling..