a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[sm0ky2]

i get to 42 form the 6 and the 7
but i dont use the matrix
doesnt make sense i know,. hard to explain..
im basically having to convert into the matrix
turning my circles into squares
to get to where you are

i hope i dont mess this up, but let me try.....

24 = 2  4
24 /2 = 12 =  1  2

1 + 2 + 4 = 7

24 / 4 = 6

6 x 7 = 42

Now, i believe the question you had was "why?"
its very simple, and you already know, you just didnt realize what it meant.
Theres the 24
then theres the Opposite 24

oh wait, but thats 48 right?
wrong. in our part of the universe the 8th 6 does not exist.
(the missing 8 )
it goes straight to 54
we dont have 54, we only started out with two 24's
so what we have is Seven  6's
whcih is 42

in the quadrant directly opposite us, the 8th 6 would be present, but they have no 4
its the 5 and the 9 thats missing in the other two quadrants.
and in the "center of the universe"
they have all the numbers.

but none of that really matters because our quadrant extends further than we can see, much less ever hope to leave.
so to say there is no 8, is perfectly "correct" as far as it concerns "us".

but basically thats why theres only 42 instead of 48
theres 24 that we dont normally see or interact with.
this is the opposite of what we experience as "dimensions"
"opposite" forces if you will
and 3 from each side go away when they combine.

its the "twist" in the fabric of the local universe, they fold in on themselves and become a finite line through a single plane and simply dont exist in any dimension that we experience.

the 3 that manifests itself as energy combines with the opposite 3 to become the missing 8th 6

[cletushowell]

Im pretty shure jesus dies at 32
thats the number i hsave to add
the cursed myan days in the 5 days
32 is 5 its in the middle of the matrix
actualy a corner i half way saw it today just could not put it together
a lot going on for me with this mrsa and
all these antibiotics ill figure it out

[cletushowell]

I think its because the helix is going around in a circle instid of
from the inside out ill try to reverse the
helix direction which way does dna grow
in a line or a or a spriral line thats the answer
im prety shure 

[cletushowell]

After 9 month the baby is born after 161218
the 1 is the sperm the six is the egg
the after the egg grows to the 18 ring
it no longer is a ball its born into a
life and breath why marco was stuck on breath
which I told him was carbon which i knoticed carbon was 42 sonething in a video the structure of the six is wrong
build 2121 so 1 can flop over then 2 can flop
its not 1221 after birth we are all born into
sin 42 the math i did earlier
21 21=42 

[sm0ky2]

@ Rose

Thats the beauty of matrix-based geometry.

you can use the same formula and maintain symmetry throughout virtually any proportional size of any circle.

for instance 6 + 3 = 9 which is 1.5 the original size
6 + 9 = 15 which is 2.5 the original size. That continues infinately as the 1/2 fraction. you can do this with all possible fractions, but it gets complex the more complex the fractions get.. (redundant?)

you lay this all out on a grid, and starting with either the problem or the answer, you can find what you're looking for with any circle.
the gap is Pi, because like i showed you before,
the circles are squared.
----------------------------------------------------------
the ancient civilizations resolved Pi by using geometrical conversion.
Basically, a polygon with the proportional dimensions of Pi,
will hold the circle/sphere of that size/or fit perfectly inside it.

from a historical standpoint, the inside/outside of the circle was "regional" for the most part.
some used the inside some used the outside. some say potato,
some say potaughto

But they all seemed to know the Pi was missing,
but inherently knew better than to try and calculate it out and include it into the problem.
they accounted for it in another way.

This simplifies the entire equation into a simple route across the matrix.
Whereas, for us today to be even within a comprehensible degree of "perfectly accurate"
we would have a decimal carried out onto 16,000+ sheets of paper.

11k years ago, they would have added up 4 single-digit numbers
divided two simple fractions
and constructed a design of |perfect accuracy|
that would baffle our modern minds.
(physial construction methods excluded,. though those may be mind-baffling as well)

Its like, two completely separate branches on the technological time line. The entire basis of science and knowledge evolved in an entirely different way in at least one previous "advanced period" in human history.
The way we do things is not the only way things can be done.
To truly understand how all of this stuff ties together, you have to go back to the foundation and rebuild your knowledge using the different rule-set, the fundamental components remain the same. height, width, depth, weight,
but how they are applied to the mathematical formula takes on a completely different appearance, and results in the same answer that we get using our more complex, less accurate knowledge-base.