Steven Marks 'Device'

[dustinthewind]

Personaly I think the speculation seems kind of pointless.  Not saying it shouldn't be talked about though.  Important thing is some one who knows how to build it has built it.  And it has been demonstrated to a few people from what the letter says.  Thats progress however 3 people isn't enough.  It needes continuous demonstration if its going to succeed.  Eventualy some one will come along who will be able to work out the over heating issues if it is legit.  Also demonstrations and building more than one model will help the repetability of the experiment and allow other models to be build which is (needed) if any success is to be gotten from the device.  So far if the info I read above was legit it looks like you are making progress.  Hope you make progress in the future. 

[Humbugger]

Personally, I think the battery idea is much less fun than the idea of  high speed rotational fields combining to have un documented effects from the local environment.

"fun" was not my objective.  mine is a simple refutation of what seemed to be offered as "proof" that the Mark device could not possibly have been a fraud due to internal batteries.  I believe what I have offered provides a possible explanation of the Mark device and debunks those who would rule out the possibilities of an internal energy storage device.

it would be rather illogical to rule out an advanced and little-known energy storage device or chemical energy conversion device yet, at the same time, accept the possible nature of the purported theory!

in terms of my personal belief regarding the Mark devices i would only say they are a mystery.  If i had to bet, i'd bet on fraud.  I do not pretend to know.

[Mannix]

Personally, I think the battery idea is much less fun than the idea of  high speed rotational fields combining to have un documented effects from the local environment.

"fun" was not my objective.  mine is a simple refutation of what seemed to be offered as "proof" that the Mark device could not possibly have been a fraud due to internal batteries.  I believe what I have offered provides a possible explanation of the Mark device and debunks those who would rule out the possibilities of an internal energy storage device.

it would be rather illogical to rule out an advanced and little-known energy storage device or chemical energy conversion device yet, at the same time, accept the possible nature of the purported theory!

in terms of my personal belief regarding the Mark devices i would only say they are a mystery.  If i had to bet, i'd bet on fraud.  I do not pretend to know.

That's great! i will keep looking and trying to find out and you can keep doubting.
I will have have much more fun with a goal and a mystery to solve  and it will remain interesting wether I am successfull or not.


I do wonder how that doubt works for you...as long as you are content I guess there is no reason to look.

[Humbugger]

Personally, I think the battery idea is much less fun than the idea of  high speed rotational fields combining to have un documented effects from the local environment.

"fun" was not my objective.  mine is a simple refutation of what seemed to be offered as "proof" that the Mark device could not possibly have been a fraud due to internal batteries.  I believe what I have offered provides a possible explanation of the Mark device and debunks those who would rule out the possibilities of an internal energy storage device.

it would be rather illogical to rule out an advanced and little-known energy storage device or chemical energy conversion device yet, at the same time, accept the possible nature of the purported theory!

in terms of my personal belief regarding the Mark devices i would only say they are a mystery.  If i had to bet, i'd bet on fraud.  I do not pretend to know.

That's great! i will keep looking and trying to find out and you can keep doubting.
I will have have much more fun with a goal and a mystery to solve  and it will remain interesting wether I am successfull or not.


I do wonder how that doubt works for you...as long as you are content I guess there is no reason to look.

The doubt keeps me from wasting a lot of time going on wild goose chases.  That leaves more time for developing actual working sellable products.  From what I've seen here on ou.com, the SM has the largest following of all the claimed devices, more replicators, more posters, more diagrams and theories and more obscure jargon than the rest combined.  But none of it seems to be getting closer to what SM showed on his videos. 

You and several others seem to enjoy a sort of guru status...handing out tidbits of wisdom and cryptic hints as if you knew some big secret.  SM seems also to enjoy that same game, speaking through you in obscure and cryptic terms.  It's all such drama and mystery.  Can you blame me for being skeptical?

Humbugger

[leeroyjenkinsii]

I don't see a single frequency generator in any of Mark's videos.  If it does work, why the hell do people keep putting exotic waveforms in it.  He isn't doing that unless it's being transmitted wirelessly to the device.  He's just sticking a couple of magnets in it and blammo....success.  I'd stick magnets up may own ass if I thought that'd do it.  Shoot I may as well give it a try.  I'll post the results here with pictures and videos so everyone knows it's real.