Bash Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

shruggedatlas

    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 548
    *
          o View Profile
          o Personal Message (Offline)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #478 on: Today at 05:31:32 PM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Quote from: spinn_MP on Today at 05:05:43 PM

    Hmm...
    Since when the language spoken has anything in common with the possibility of "OU" claims?
    You're one of the "innebriated" guy bots?
    Jeeeez....


Nothing, I am just saying, if someone is not a native Engrish speaker, there is no sense in nitpicking spelling.  You are right, OU is the main thing here.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

fuzzytomcat

    * Sr. Member
    * ****
    * Posts: 280
    * Open Source Experimentalist
    *
          o View Profile
          o Personal Message (Offline)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #471 on: Today at 12:43:19 PM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on Today at 09:42:35 AM


    I swear to you all, on my life, and by all that I hold holy,  that the reason I was banned is because I posted that words to the effect that 'ANYONE WHO CLAIMS TO UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING ABOUT LEEDSKALNIN'S WORK WILL FIRST HAVE TO BE ABLE TO DUPLICATE THE MIRACLE AT CORAL CASTLE'.   

    The post was deleted and I was banned.  It's that simple.  If you can find those buried threads of mine at that forum then look at my posts.  They were ENIRELY INOFFENSIVE.  ALL OF THEM.   I saw to it - precisely because the threat of being banned was hanging over my head like the sword of Damocles.  EF.com banned me because they were erroneously advised by Glen in a public post and in a private email that I had been banned from OU.com and from ALL OTHER FORUMS.  They assumed that I would now be entirely OFF ALL PUBLIC FORUMS.  They did not realise, and frankly nor did I, that Stefan had NOT banned me.  He had simply locked my thread on APPLICATION FROM GLEN.  Go figger.

    Kindest regards,
    Rosemary


Re: Open Source "duped"
« Sent to: hartiberlin on: February 06, 2010, 02:37:00 AM »

   Reply with quoteQuote ReplyReply Save PMSave PM Remove this messageRemove

Hi Stefan,

The thread is locked right now because shes a moderator and can delete what ever she wants so I locked the thread and she hasn't figured out how to unlock it.

She always said she had everything taken but that's a untruth she needed a independent verification to make her Magnetic Field Model so it became the basis of the IEEE paper that ended up being rejected several times now the last time circumventing all the other authors in a submission she did at IEEE TIE with out our permission or approval of the document that ended up being a "Immediate Rejection" because of it's context. This would be authors Harvey, Jibbguy, Ashwelth of Pancea and myself a direct violation of IEEE rules of complete agreement of the text not happening and USA laws in falsifying documents. This has been verified by IEEE in a e-mail correspondence of her submittal.

She also misrepresented what the scope use was for on a "loaned"  Tektronix TDS 3054C and a DPO 3054 stating it was lent on the basis of proving her theory for the thesis, the results were the recall of the equipment because of these two facts, there was no specific use in the agreement and the scopes could have been used as a TV there were no strings attached and the "loan" word was never to be mentioned as not to imply Tektronix was in the business of lending out equipment but was for Open Source research and development and it's gone now because of the squabbling, bickering and back biting going on at Energetic Forum " COP 17 | Rosemary Ainslie | Part 2 " thread right now.

Aaron has set up a by invitation board now so she cant post in it and is in the process of cleaning up the thread which will be lock when done so she has no sounding board.

I still would like to keep updates going on but I'm not sure how to handle this other than you possibly have time to contact the members mentioned including Aaron to verify what is being told you. I do have a e-mail from Lisa @ Tektronix giving me a heads up why the scope was wanted back and there staying away for awhile until she stops or has no place for the BS, I can forward this e-mail but Lisa wants this not to be use against Rosemary so they don't looked duped also in the end results so it would have to be in confidence.

So it's up to you what to do and if verification is needed e-mail addresses can be provided or you could use the OU messenger service .... your call

Best,
Glen

[Rosemary Ainslie]

ashtweth_nihilisti

    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 633
    * Open souce will free humanity
    *
          o View Profile
          o WWW
          o Email
          o Personal Message (Offline)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #466 on: Today at 12:31:09 PM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Your not getting out of your behavior that easy ROSE

there are more then 5 members +Admin now that can testify to that.
I just found out From Aaron what you have been up too behind the scenes.

post open source info, do not push the slanderous disinfo button, you will have to answer for what you have done, if your still around even by then.

Glen, this one was for you

Ash

[Rosemary Ainslie]

ashtweth_nihilisti

    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 632
    * Open souce will free humanity
    *
          o View Profile
          o WWW
          o Email
          o Personal Message (Offline)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #468 on: Today at 12:39:31 PM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Quote from: Pirate88179 on Today at 12:30:36 PM

    Wow:

    What a self important post that was.  Are you done?

    Again, you did not answer my original question of why are you here?  Can you not answer this?  Will you not?  If Rose is insane and posting gibberish than, what do you care?

    I do not expect any rational answers from you...I do not think you capable of that.  Just continue on with your "nothing to see here" and keep posting which will tell others that here may be indeed something to see here.

    What are you afraid of?  Who do you work for really?  The rest of us want to know.

    And please stop your threats with Stefan.  This got old before you even posted it.  If you have this much power over all energy research forums, you would not have to make any threats.....right?

    Thought so.

    Bill


I am here to post the truth, and make sure the technology is focused on, not your lack of skills to read or slanderous posts against Glen,

We sort of made the only real difference  hence why your name is not on the IEEE paper

However mine is and so is Glens
BUDDY

The novelty of helping you READ has worn off BILL
I am done with you, your wasting your own time.

Ashtweth

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Report to moderator   Logged
ashtweth_nihilisti

    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 631
    * Open souce will free humanity
    *
          o View Profile
          o WWW
          o Email
          o Personal Message (Offline)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #463 on: Today at 11:54:06 AM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote
    * Modify messageModify
    * Remove this messageRemove
    * Split TopicSplit Topic
    *

Listen up BILL

Did you help write the IEE paper that has my name, Aaron, Harvey, Glen and Steve's name on it? NO?

Did you work with Rose LIKE FIVE OF US DID for 5 months and know whats going on no?

NO?

Do you know WHY Admin banned ROSE NO?

NO?

Your lack of taking in information ALREADY POSTED HERE BY TRUSTED MEMBERS  does not match up to REALITY BUDDY.

You insulted Glen to, listen up FOOL,.

1) Glen is more of a man and contribution to this genre then you, dont insult him or question what 5 people and the energetic forum admin have already told you, or i can tell you your now going to end up being a laughing stock in this communty

The warnings given to Rose are for a reason, she is not what you can know BUDDY , HENCE WHY getting banned and 5 people here attempting to make sure open source engineers  dont get their time wasted and we have EVERY RIGHT to  (as we were there) warn  Rose not to cause slanderous distracting false posts of Glen and deviate from the technology


I am running out of patience with reminding you of the facts of  this BUDDY READ AND wake up, we are saying Rose got banned and we are focusing on the technology, Glen warned people for a reason.

Wake up Bill, maybe ill give you time or day after i see you match what we did for 5 months with the IEE till then Buddy dont make me laugh and wake up AND READ .

I did not get her banned, i sated that already , you stupid XXX ..can you READ Bill

Ashtweth Palise.

Stefan i will be amending my recommendations,