Bash Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Rosie

No worries at all.  Look, I am a firm believer of no hate/zero anger however I will say my piece and stand up when an injustice is being perpetrated.  EF is rife with hypocrisy and egocentric folk that talk too much and I shall now leave it at that!  I for one, do my own thing scientifically, with the odd post here and there looking into various intriguing things and speaking with certain nice folk who frequent the forums (hi Pirate! and Mk1 LOL).

Regarding your comment of "fighting the lonely corner", I can say from my view that because Ash always (even until recently) acted cosy with you in the public forum, most people would have been none the wiser that something untoward was happening in your camp.  All we know is our own personal experiences with these people (which is far from positive), therefore when your plight surfaced here, this is the reason that so many people voice their opinion in your defense or at least express their viewpoint.  Believe me, the casual observer may be quiet but he is far from unobservant or clued into what REALLY is going on.

When your beaten down and feeling all alone, its always good to remember what PT Barnum once said "You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time BUT you can't fool all of the people all of the time."

Yes, the internet and forums are full of gullable folk that can be duped by smooth talk but not all!

Kind regards

E-Goose

Thanks E-Goose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Guys, I'd copy Glen's post but it's just too long. 

In any event.  I think he's trying to refer to my open admission to not being able to build or read or design the switching side of a 555 switching circuit.  He's quoting the early chapters of my admission of this and - unfortunately - I still can't.  But I'm perfectly capable of putting that switching circuit in series with my own to drive a MOSFET.  And I'm perfectly capable of designing a circuit for its use  - precisely because it's that's simple.  I think a high school science student could have designed our circuit.  And I also think the actual intention here is to imply that I cannot read or design ANY circuit.  But the design for the switching part of that circuit?  There are many examples of this all over the internet.  One just needs to google it.  And I'm entirely satisfied that just about everyone copies those designs and modifies around them.  So what?

This is precisely the 'genius' of their propagandising methods.  They select isolated comments and use them as they please.  That endless reference to diodes is another example of 'quotes out of context'.  The discussion was the outright denial - also in the early chapters - that one COULD NOT get energy back to the battery.  I recommended that they simply need to put a diode to return current back to one or even two batteries in parallel and they would immediately see that - INDEED - one could return that energy.  At the early stages everyone wanted to include capacitors and inductors and God knows what.  I was anxiously trying to show them that it was not needed.  The energy WILL recharge the battery.  And so have our experiments shown. 

For the rest of those comments.  It's was an interesting stroll down memory lane.  You will notice - AS EVER - a desparate need NOT to refer to my actual skills which is in the thesis.  If there is any value to any of my work it probably is this.  And the circuit - in all it's simplicity - was simply intended to prove that thesis.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35909676/REVISION-OF-DARK-MATTER-MFM

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Just posting for others emailing me, here , that i wont be involved in this thread/forum/ incident, and for others to ignore any reference to me (never mind posting/emailing me about it) . Good luck with your experiments here.

Ashtweth Palise

[fuzzytomcat]

Just posting for others emailing me, here , that i wont be involved in this thread/forum/ incident, and for others to ignore any reference to me (never mind posting/emailing me about it) . Good luck with your experiments here.

Ashtweth Palise

Hey Ash,

This incident reminds me of the "FAMOUS" Over Unity member "MYLOW" and how he was put on a pedestal here by most all of the community, but only one or two telling members saying somethings FISHY here ....... most members fell "hook, line and sinker" for his experiments shown and referenced here.

There was one member that showed everyone the "LINE" from Mylows hook and still members didn't believe ..... sinking then at Over Unity forum the minority members up roared only then something was done.

Best Regards,
Glen

   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hey Ash,

This incident reminds me of the "FAMOUS" Over Unity member "MYLOW" and how he was put on a pedestal here by most all of the community, but only one or two telling members saying somethings FISHY here ....... most members fell "hook, line and sinker" for his experiments shown and referenced here.

There was one member that showed everyone the "LINE" from Mylows hook and still members didn't believe ..... sinking then at Over Unity forum the minority members up roared only then something was done.

Best Regards,
Glen

Hi guys,

LOL  More propaganda.  If indeed any of this reminds Glen of Mylow - then we're in deep water.  We're working with Glen's experimental data from Glen's tests.  If this is based on the same type of fraudulent representations that Mylow gave then we've really got problems.  Fortunately I don't know that it's possible to distort the data from that Tektronix DPO 3054C. And that's what we based our evidence on.

It would be such a pleasure to start dealing with facts rather than these endless innuendos.  They get more absurd by the day. 

Regards,
Rosemary