Self-Runner NS Coil Pulse Motor Live Video Stream. It's been going for months!

[Omnibus]

@Pirate88179,

Can you describe in more detail your experiment? When the coil was not buried in the ground were the metals insulated and yet there was still potential difference measured between them?

[Omnibus]

He says outright he is not claiming OU in the video. I didn't say he's 'convincing,' and really he's not trying convince anyone of anything. Deep breaths, man.

On the contrary, he' s trying to convince whoever reads this that it is "Self-Runner NS Coil Pulse Motor" which it is not if the coil is a galvanic cell.

[dllabarre]

The NS coil replications that myself, and several others in the group, made about 3 years ago worked pretty good. 

Bill

Can you point me to a URL that lists the components and instructions to build one of yours and/or Lasersaber's Stubblefield coil?

Thanks
DonL

[Rosemary Ainslie]

He spicifically states in the video he's not claiming OU. If the battery really is dry, you have to admit it's intriguing.

I LOVE waking up to this kind of thread interest.  happyfunball - take a look at the construct related to the actual Nathan Stubblefield coil which lasersaber has given us.  I'll try and get the link when I've posted here.  You'll note that amperage and voltage are evident without damping the cotton.  Damping simply served to increase both.  That's the first point.  Secondly in this coil lasersaber has done without the secondary winding - all that copper that usually takes up almost a 3rd of the coil.  It only has the initial windings.  Then.  The coil itself was over 80 days drying and only half that time was the entire test apparatus in 'full swing' so to speak.  I very much doubt that there's any moisture left in it - but Cat's right.  It would be as well to determine this - if possible.  But then - build a second rig PLEASE.  Let's see this one go to the death. 

Regarding ou prize claims - can't quite remember who brought this up - I think Stefan wants something to run for 'months'? is it?  Certainly not even for a year.  I'm glad to see that lasersaber has got this in a controlled environment - hopefully a library or somesuch - available for public view and to be put on public record and YET - not available for sabotage.  I'm reasonably certain that he'll not change that apparatus.  I do hope so.

Pesonally I think that lasersaber has compensated for the lesser voltage resulting from a dry coil - by adding the second switch.  Indeed.  This is very, very interesting.  Absolutely.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

A Galvanic cell, named after Luigi Galvani, is an electrochemical cell that derives electrical energy from chemical reactions taking place within the cell. It generally consists of two different metals connected by a salt bridge, or individual half-cells separated by a porous membrane. It is sometimes called a "Voltaic cell", after Alessandro Volta, inventor of the voltaic pile, the first electrical battery. In common usage, the word "battery" has come to include a single Galvanic cell, but a battery properly consists of multiple cells.[1][2]

Guys, here's Wiki's definition of a galvanic cell.  I looked it up to put paid to Omnibus' pretentions.  You will notice that it requires the physical separation of two metals through an acid or alkaline mix or through the construct of a salt bridge.  Here we've got the two metals in gridlock and some tenuous insulation of iron winding with the use of cotton fibre.  I very much doubt it can be described as a 'galvanic' cell at all.

Also of interest is Cat's reference to the date of the initial Nathan Stubblefield patent.  I'm just sorry that this device was not, apparently, further developed.  It would have changed history. 

Regards,
Rosemary