Self-Runner NS Coil Pulse Motor Live Video Stream. It's been going for months!

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Like Ii said, if there's no galvanic contact between the two metals (the two metals are insulated from each other)

When I read something like this then my actual concern is that we're dealing with another troll.  In the first instance he takes the trouble to tell lasersaber - obviously a genius experimentalist - that he DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT.  And then he states

and the rotation persists while the device is in a Faraday cage, then we'll have something to pay attention to.

that initial 'REQUIREMENT ACCORDING TO OMNIBUS' the omniscient ignoramus - is that the two metals must be insulated from each other?  Why?  What exactly would this prove?  That it's not a galvanic effect and therefore of no interest.  Or that it is a galvanic effect and therefore of no interest?    And this from a man who professes to know whereof he speaks.  I would urgently advise all members and readers to see this pretentiousness for what it is.  Indeed the most of us already do. 

Then we get this.

I'm afraid that's not the case, though. If I'm wrong then this person should come here and clearly state that there's no galvanic cell in his contraption and the two metals are wound into the said coil while insulated from each other and the device thus set up works in a Faraday cage too.

Notice, if you please, there is no request here.  There is a demand that this gentleman - who has taken time out of his life to give us the variation to the Nathan Stubblefield Coil - gratis and for nothing - who has video'd and explained the manufacture of the entire apparatus - also gratis and for nothing - to then demand that he demean himself and come and explain to this obviously intellectually challenged mediocrity - what?  That Omnibus needs to revise his terminology?  That's the only appropriate response.  Else just ignore him.  Hopefully he'll do the latter.

Otherwise this whole thing has to be dismissed.

By whose ruling may I ask?  Does Omnibus now determine what may or may not be allowed on this forum and on lasersaber's own thread?  What extraordinary presumption of authority.

We've seen enough incompetence and too many sick games played here (@cletushowell being the latest) that it's high time to take a clear stance against such charade.

Well.  It seems that Omnibus now sees lasersaber's offer as a 'sick game' - unless he declare something that is entirely illogical - demeaning and insulting.  All I can say to this attitude is this.  lasersaber I heartily apologise to you that our members can be so thankless and impolite.  I trust you know enough to ENTIRELY discount Omnibus' attitude and that you realise how much the rest of us appreciate your work.

It is precisely this attitude that Omnibus and others like him manage to hold back OU technology.  To me the real miracle is that progress is made on these forums notwithstanding these trolls.  Are they paid? From what I understand the only OU technology that Omnibus has attempted to defend is Steorn's technology.  And that technology is NOT FREE or OPEN SOURCED.  It's licensed.  Makes one think.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33937867/IF-I-WAS-A-TROLL

[nul-points]

Why listen to dreary windbags like Omnibus? ... (he might be OU himself if someone wanted to strap a Sterling engine on his keyboard)

LOL

it appears OnthebUs is already OU


more energy emerges from his backside than goes into his brain! 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

No, he's not convincing. What he's showing is nothing, it's trivial, he can't get it and if he wants to persuade those of us who follow the matter closely he should really do some serious work to prove that's something worthwhile. So far it's a joke and we need no more of this.

@Omnibus
I trust your use of the word "we" is intended as the royal plural.  It is NOT A REFLECTION OF THE MAJORITY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS HERE.  "We" as the majority of the contributors in this thread absolutely do not regard this effect as 'trivial'.

And may I again ask you to show us your OWN contributions to OU technology?  From where I sit this has been confined to a sad little apologia  that thermodynamic laws allow for OU?  Where's your paper?  Where's you treatise?  Where's you nobel prize?  Where's that brilliant logic that gives you this presumption of authority to speak on behalf of everyone here?  It's patently lacking.  Show us your credentials Omnibus that we can revise these opinions about you.

I suspect that the next thing that will happen is that shruggedatlas will now come to the fray and try and explain that you're the next best thing to Einstein.  LOL.

Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Besides, if he's not claiming OU what is his device doing in this forum? It shouldn't be in any forum discussing unusual setups for that matter. What he's presenting may be shown at some school fair where kids present experiments based on the known laws of physics. No more than that. Like I said, all he's showing is trivial and worthy of no attention in a forum such as this.

It is my opinion that if we depended on your own standards of 'worthy' experiments we'd need to wait into eternity to find such.  Clearly you are, yourself, incapable of original thought let alone original experimentation. 

Where are your own experiments Omnibus?  Even a replication would help?  Where are they?  What can you bring to the table?  Apart from your mediocrities and your lack of accreditation?

Rosemary

[truthbeknown]

.


I suspect that the next thing that will happen is that shruggedatlas will now come to the fray and try and explain that you're the next best thing to Einstein.  LOL.

Rosemary
[/quote]



Why are you being so cruel?



J.