Self-Runner NS Coil Pulse Motor Live Video Stream. It's been going for months!

[Rosemary Ainslie]

On the contrary, I have a moral obligation as an intellectual to fight for the truth and to not allow stupidity to overwhelm discussions on important matters. You may waste your time all you want but don't waste the time of others. Have no doubt, I'll confront any stupidity you try to impose on others as soon as I spot it. Am I clear?

Am I clear?     Not actually Omnibus.  I'm actually rather amused at your description of yourself as an intellectual.  Shouldn't you show us some evidence of more than average intellect - if you claim to be an 'intellectual'?  I would have thought?   And this 'fight for truth'?  When you barely acquaint yourself with the facts of the case.  LOL.  And that you will not allow 'stupidity to overwhelm discussions' and then - on 'important matters'.  LOL.  It's rich.  The only thing that's overwhelmed the last pages on this otherwise pristine thread - is your own stupidity.

I think it was YOU who determined that lasersaber's experiment was 'trivial' and his rights to post on his experiment - questionable.  By contrast you do what?  I keep asking this.  WHAT HAVE YOU DONE HERE?  You seem to feel you have every right to comment, rather freely at that - or fancifully - or wildly - in any event - entirely incorrectly - on an experiment where you also - self evidently - have NO knowledge the experimental apparatus or it's test objects.  Then you demand irrelevant explanations for that same apparatus while you continue to parade the extent of your own ignorance and presumption.   

Frankly I think it is YOUR comments that are trivial and YOUR rights to comment questionable.  And I think the only person here who has shown us the most alarming level of stupidity is yourself.  With respect.  Actually - not so much.

Again
Rosemary

[nievesoliveras]

People, cant you see that with your eternal discussion you have trashed another good topic?

Why dont you all make a topic called " lets deal our differences here " and leave other peoples thread uncluttered with your differences?

Jesus

[Groundloop]

Hi,

I think I posted this drawing in another thread but here it is again.
The Copper and Iron together with water forms a galvanic battery.
But we also have a coil and a core so if we short circuit the coil
for a short time then we can use the changing magnetic field to
run a magnet/rotor. An insulated pickup coil can be added on the
outside of the coil for various purposes.

Groundloop.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

People, cant you see that with your eternal discussion you have trashed another good topic?

Why dont you all make a topic called " lets deal our differences here " and leave other peoples thread uncluttered with your differences?

Jesus

Jesus - I've seen this kind of blanket criticism before.  Are you saying that we must allow unsolicited and unwarranted criticisms against any technology?  That none of us must do anything about it.  Just let it hang there?  Gathering dust and killing threads?  Interesting.  And that we must do NOTHING to speak out against this?  And who then benefits?  OU? Open source? Those experimentalists who've sacrificed their time and trouble to bring their technologies to the table? 

I put it to you that if one did not actively challenge the detractors to these new technologies then one may as well close up shop and stop trying to advance clean green.  And it is my opinion that very often those detractors are simply anxious to 'be heard' - which is dangerously self-serving if, in being 'heard' they're detracting from the very subject that needs nurture and support. 

And it's no picnic to stand up and defend.  Nice to keep one's nose clean and not get involved - but it serves no purpose in advancing these delicate realities that those, such as lasersaber are bringing to the table.  Pirate was able to point out the requirement for checking the water content of the device without offending anyone.  I earnestly suggest that it's possible to do so at all levels and as required.  But when the detraction is done with the censorial - ill advised - liberal criticisms that Omnibus enjoys - then I think it is better that such attitudes be addressed.  Lest this technology be damned before it comes to fruition.

So.  Tell me how you would check this inevitable 'attack' that seems to follow in the footsteps of really desirable technology.  If you have an answer I really want to hear it.

Rosemary

Edited.  May I just add - that it's very smug to disassociate oneself from the quarrel - but what purpose does that serve if it also kills the technology?  I'm afraid that this is one subject that one actually NEEDS to protect if it is to survive at all.  And I speak with authority.  I KNOW that my own poor contributions to these efforts would have died - entirely - had I not confronted a SLEW of attacks.  And I suspect that Dave Lambright's extraordinary device would have died an untimely death on EF.com if we had not faught the good fight.  It's required - is my take.  Or there will be precisely NO progress in a field of endeavour that really is already fraught with scepticism and detractors all with their own multitude of varying objectives.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

sorry guys a duplicate post