STEPHEN HORVATH - Australian

[endlessoceans]

Read the Stephen Horvath patents and the process like most others seems pretty easy to understand.

First, this isn't the standard electron conduction current electrolysis and people need to get that nonsense out of there head. As the inventor claimed, the process is based on RADIOLYSIS: Molecular decomposition of a substance as a result of radiation, molecular disintegration resulting from radiation. Not an inefficient electron conduction current but EM radiation is what is claimed to decompose the H2O into H2 and O2.

Which then begs the only real question why nobody ever mentions Radiolysis /radiation decomposition but instead go off on some absurd tangent about amps and electronics. Does anyone find it strange that most like to talk about everything under the Sun except the process that actually makes the technology work?... RADIOLYSIS: Molecular decomposition of a substance as a result of radiation.

Here's a clue, a HV spark gap produces large amounts of UV and IR RADIATION as well as visible light. Key word RADIATION, which implies the RADIATION process used may have something to do with a form of RADIATION unlike a conventional electron current. It could be that RADIATION has something to do with it?.

Another clue, we see many people connecting some electrolysis plates immersed in water directly to a low voltage/high current car battery. They claim the whole point is to drive a large current between the plates to split the water but then complain the high current is depleting the energy of there battery. Which begs the question, what the !@#$ did they think was going to happen?. In fact, all they really built is a resistance heater not an electrolysis device because almost all the energy is converted directly into heat not H2 or O2. Why would they keep building a resistance heater then complain it keeps acting like a heater?. Maybe they should try to understand how a resistance heater actually works then not do that, do something else, do anything but the thing they keep doing because it obviously doesn't work.

This Horvath guy sounds pretty intelligent in my opinion...

AC

you are 100% spot on correct onepower

blunt and to the point

Steve Ryan in newzealand did exactly the same thing with the motorbike.  Radiation is the key.  BTW people....you dont do it with liquid.....you turn the water into a gas first then you SPLIT it .

Horvath and Ryan the same things happened.  Ryan was on 60 minutes and 2 weeks later not a peep out of him anymore.  The ridicule of the interviewers was disgusting.

No man invents something to go on TV and be ridiculed.  Ryan drove a landcruiser around australia on waste oil and water.

and now you cant even find his home address or linkedcIN page

You decide what to believe

But onepower is right....the horvath patent is not difficult but I suspect its beyond what most of you will ever want to put forth in effort because to reproduce  the tech will take you years of work and private funds.

So i really dont understand at what point the majority of people on this forum think free energy in a simple form is going to land in their laps??

[russwr]

You people are just like most of the others. You don't read all the tech data in a message. You just go off on a tangent without going with the flow. Read line 8 again of my post in the MORNING message, and line 15 of the PM message. The inventor Horvath had more than one US Patent. (3) as -  Low volts + high amps, High volts + low amps, and a Radiolysis glass tube electrolyzer. Do your own research on same subject matter before complaining about someone else's post message. The post was about the low 3v and 200A pulse CDI DC electrolysis without Diode rectification type, aided by pulsing magnetic field that greatly increased efficiency so as Hydrogen evolved at rate to sustain engines with alternator fully recharging auto battery. Unusual circuit designs are necessary to become within the realm of over unity.