FUELLESS CAR PROTOTYPE by ISMAEL MOTOR

[iald]

Proper measurements are very easy to do. The use of battery terminal voltages and guessing lamp brightness will always have a massive discrepancy.  Despite the fact the DOE car tests clearly showed a good OU device these silly tests without proper measurements will not do Ismeal any favours.

Put a volt meter on the batteries and a current shunt to get i/p watts. Do the same with the load. Volts and AMPS and then a scope shot to make sure we are looking at either SINE or DC on the o/p A 3kw electric heater is a good load and then measure accurately the power going to it.

If the MEG is unchanged from the car data tests it has a COP of 2.7. For 1000 watt load the battery will be providing around 370 watts.

A 24Ah battery has about 288 watt hour so two in series capacity 576 watt hour. However lead acid is rated at 20 hour discharge. Within 1 or 2 hour discharges capacity can be 30% less. This assuming the batteries are brand new is enough to supply 1kw out of the meg for about 90 mins while the battery load is a constant 370 watts.

Its loopable assuming 1kw  is a 24/7 comfortable MEG  figure without over heating. 370 watts needs to go back plus losses could need a total of 470 watts going back if using inverters and lead batteries. This means it can loop and run a 530 watt load indefinitely.

However it would be so much better to see all this properly measured and recorded. Its also interesting that Ismael is considering using the MEG as a power source as i strongly suggested about a year ago  without it being tied to an electric car.

Ismael

Already signed of  tired, mixing everything so don't expect a clear data or measurement from Ismael, Actually he is not using any tester now, just common sense.  He 's no proper sleep for the last 5 days, because MEG R & D. The sure thing to what he is doing now, he still running the same 2,000 watts bulbs with 110V across the bulbs terminal & the batteries start from 270V drops to 266V only from 6,000watts for more than 6 hours now.

[iald]

Proper measurements are very easy to do. The use of battery terminal voltages and guessing lamp brightness will always have a massive discrepancy.  Despite the fact the DOE car tests clearly showed a good OU device these silly tests without proper measurements will not do Ismeal any favours.

Put a volt meter on the batteries and a current shunt to get i/p watts. Do the same with the load. Volts and AMPS and then a scope shot to make sure we are looking at either SINE or DC on the o/p A 3kw electric heater is a good load and then measure accurately the power going to it.

If the MEG is unchanged from the car data tests it has a COP of 2.7. For 1000 watt load the battery will be providing around 370 watts.

A 24Ah battery has about 288 watt hour so two in series capacity 576 watt hour. However lead acid is rated at 20 hour discharge. Within 1 or 2 hour discharges capacity can be 30% less. This assuming the batteries are brand new is enough to supply 1kw out of the meg for about 90 mins while the battery load is a constant 370 watts.

Its loopable assuming 1kw  is a 24/7 comfortable MEG  figure without over heating. 370 watts needs to go back plus losses could need a total of 470 watts going back if using inverters and lead batteries. This means it can loop and run a 530 watt load indefinitely.

However it would be so much better to see all this properly measured and recorded. Its also interesting that Ismael is considering using the MEG as a power source as i strongly suggested about a year ago  without it being tied to an electric car.

Ismael goal to run the bulbs 24hours a day 7 days a week forget the measurement.

All Of His testing instrument BUSTED from RADIANT ENERGY SPIKES. he is using only his senses now,,, ears for sound & eyes for intensity of brightness & nose for burning coil insulation.

E car has own Build in MEG. Need first to solve the overheating from problem.

[mscoffman]

These various videos he is making are not real time. So his development cycle
seems more compressed then it actually is. One thing he should be concerned
about is rotating too much energy through each of his acid/lead batteries -
essentially wearing them out even if they stay charged up. The sooner I see
someone who says that his setup is actually producing this energy for them,
the better I will like it.

It's like the humans who first invented fire. Get the thing out there and starting
to do some good, we'll be glad to discuss it's "magic" later on.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[synchro1]

Here's an interesting video from Altrez of the Energetic Forum Ismael Aviso thread. Altrez runs a piece of magnet wire from a microwave oven to the negative pole of a 9 volt rechargable Ni-Cad battery and raises the voltage. Ground scouring or rectenna effect?
Same gigahertz Ishmael multiplies his cell tower signal up to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJP1xRvevoc

[iald]

I vote to send Ismael back to High School.

Why?
Well, 2000 Watt/220V light bulbs have an estimated resistance of 24.2 ohms.
(R=Volt^2/Power, NOT Volt/Power!!)
At 85 - 92V this means a power consumption of roughly 300 - 350 Watt, not 800 Watt

His statements are full of this kind of crucial mistakes.
He seriously needs to check his data otherwise he is just scamming without even knowing it himself.

Don't worry Ismael so exited & tired ( mistake on calculation usually happen to any devoted inventor's ) on His MEG R & D newly born less than two weeks after they assemble it. We have new two video showing the big difference  between a normal load of 1,000 watts & the voltage drop per minute, against 1,000 load with MEG system & voltage drop per minute using same batteries. They have very big difference.