Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



FUELLESS CAR PROTOTYPE by ISMAEL MOTOR

Started by luishan, September 08, 2010, 11:50:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

norman6538

I understand how the backemf makes higher voltage but how does
it make more amps or watts? It seems to me its just making the pie pieces (amps) smaller.

And then the air coil with the long bar magnet puzzles me too.
The air coil would have very low current out due to no core
flux concentration.


Norman

teslaalset

I don't want to spoil the fun we have here, but applying GHz range oscillations with coils the size Ismael is showing in his video's seems a bit unrealistic to me.
Somebody at the Energitic Forum also mentioned that in one of the video's a co-rider of his car is joining a ride on his car and sits down right at the coil location. This would indeed influence the coil behaviour a lot if GHz range frequencies are applied. Will he cope with such alteration?

I want to be neutral here, but I wonder whether anybody else has similar observations.


grizli

Quote from: bolt on February 19, 2011, 04:11:40 AM
RV is a teaching tool everyone needs to start somewhere. Here you learn that RF=RE as a simile where RF techniques are converted to Electrical Power engineering. Eventually it all comes down to RLC and tune tune and more tuning.  Here you will learn the importance of VARS where standing waves and power factor zero equate to an infinite VSWR. Within the TPU its a triple frequency stacked co-linear 3 phase solid state RV tuned to create infinite VSWR or PF zero or standing wave condition of immense VARS. This creates a partial singularity device which creates compressed gravity due to the singularity and time compression. For a 1000 watt device the VARS within the device will be around 10KVAR's

You also notice that the "gurus" of our history all most always start with looped motor/generator systems then later it becomes a solid state design. Kapanadze is a fine example of this. If you have a generator where a moving magnet or coil is just replaced with a stationary magnet and coil except now you just pulse it.  Then you find a way to extract the pulse without lugging. Several methods can be used  such as switching the pulse into a load cap then disconnecting the source. Or using bifilar windings to prevent self induced magnetic fields. This is kapandaze trick. Or short on coil pulse peaks creates harmonics of much higher frequency and of greater energy then the source pulse. By using a simple high pass filter you can literally syhon off the HF energy without disturbing the LF source frequency provides an anti-lugging generator. Magnacoaster technology works exactly the same except is using Bloch Wall modulation on carrier frequency and the excess harmonics are pulled off using High pass filter. Other methods include switching flux paths and isolating the source after pulsing creates excess energy from ferromagnetic resonance of the iron goes OU. This produces a MEG transformer typical COP is around 3.  Several people have done this from Bulgaria, Russians, Italians many people made this flux path switching MEGs and shown i/p about 1kw and providing about 3Kw o/p.

So here is the summary - there is nothing new under the sun its all basically what we already know but the tweaks are in the details. There is no need to work BLIND first accept that OU is real that takes most people about 10 years for the brain to activate. Then research the many methods and start building upon the things you know starting very small and make it bigger this is how Ismael made his electric car.

Classic TC method could use VARS, but load  in general is NOT resistor , its capacitor, which will not reduce huge Q factor of TC.
I mentioned this several times here but never had chance to replicate it.

we have TC Transm and TC Reciever.     TCT and TCR.

when TCR has resistor for load it lowers Q factor of TCR and also that way TCR affects TCT as load.

Why not using capacitor instead resistor, rectifier and capacitor. Voltage drop will be small on capacitor and Q factor will not be reduced much.  for example 10V 10F(just example) capacitor at the bottom of TCR in series to earth (using full rectifier), we can also use low turn coil instead.
This seems like perfect way of using reactive energy, of course charged cap must be disconnected before its energy we can use and replaced with empty cap.


Another well known crude way is after we increase  magnetic  field inside coil, we disconnect the coil from battery, and coil starts to natural LC oscilate, than we collect that energy by charging cap.


Than imagine simple coil like Tesla coil but not top capacity, just simple single layer solenoid. Every coil has its own LC natural frequency.

when voltage at the ends is maximum we short the ends of the coil and what we get ? we should get HF complex harmonics oscillation inside coil I presume, and only way to collect that energy is to have maybe center tap of coil, cause outer ends are shortened.

but this frequency should be EVEN higher than natural LC frequency of solenoid

Bolt please enlighten me :D

grizli

Quote from: woopy on February 20, 2011, 06:18:29 PM
Hi all my 2 cents

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5BxwkvCaIg
Good luck at all

Laurent

This is not natural LC coil oscillation shorting at its peak, its shorting of coil than with perm. magnet approaching affected. Shorting  such coil equals to opposite , it equals to free oscillation of coil when you open the coil. I dont think thats what the did, read my post above, but of course I am not sure, bolt will answer I hope. All in all it may harvest that effect in a way