Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Very simple magnet motor princip

Started by SwinG, April 26, 2006, 11:03:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

SwinG

Thanks for comments, Jdo300 !

I have looked into this now, and it seems that you are right. But if you should be able to get any power out, I can't see any other way than putting the damn thing on a shaft.
I have thought about maybe you could get the outher ring to wobble instead (should give the same result, not?). That shoulden't take much power to do that. I red on my searching crusade, that you could get the spinner to spin continuously by wobbling the outer ring the right way. If you make a wobbling mechanism form the outer ring, and attaches a RPM or tourque monitor on the shaft, and feeds those information to the "wobble controller" in some way, this might just work. Just a thought.

It seems that some experimenters are missing the thing about the missing outer ring magnet. Although I can't explaing why, it might be an important part of the design. Any comments on that?

Here are the fruits of my crusade:

http://www.keelynet.com/gravity/hamag.htm
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hamspin.htm
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hammnu.htm
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/hfrnrgen.htm
http://www.world-famous.com/DavidHamel.html
http://www.davidhamel.com/
http://www.hcrs.at/HAMEL.HTM
http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/publish/article_812.shtml
http://www.geocities.com/undergsci/hameltech.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hameltech/
http://www.phact.org/e/z/hamel.htm

Thanks, SwinG

Jdo300

Hi SwinG,

Yes, the missing magnet in the new design is quite interesting. I wonder if it eliminates the need to have the ring wobble? If I get some time, I just might try the design again with the magnet missing....

God Bless,
Jason O

FreeEnergy

not only it has a missing magnet there is also a drilled hole right?

Jdo300

Where did you see the drilled hole? Maybe i missed that.

God Bless,
Jason O

SwinG

I don't think the holes are of much or any significance, cause George Green in the clip says you can just use fridge magnets. I'm more concerned about the size, strength, amount and spacing of the magnets. There are no info regarding that.
I have ordered some Neodymn magnets. Maybee they are to strong, but I don't see how that should be off importance.

Do any of you guys have experience of the expected lifetime for neodymn magnets in continuing use?

BTW, George Green has gone full blown contactee at www.nomorehoaxes.com . If that adds to his credability or not is probably a subjective assesment. But the similarities to the David Hamel case are interesting (if not, then atleast the "who is the copycat" are interesting).
The movie clip is from a movie called "Reopeninge of the Billy Meier case", and I think it's from around 1999. Both George Green and David Hamel says the technology is related to the UFO propulsion and antigravity system, hmm... SPOOKY!

Thank's, SwinG