Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



My free energy experiment.

Started by stevensrd1, September 12, 2010, 11:07:25 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

stevensrd1

Yes I have tried it with just a regular unmodified motor. But it did not run long, just a few hours if I recall correctly. And this let to much charge cross over,,so much was wasted in heat and so forth. I have even used a diode so no energy back flows least the two series and parallel equalize, this also was a failure since it only ran a few hours and alot of energy was radiated in heat from the diode. I even ran it with no motor and just the diode with the same effect. It seems as the modified motor allows contact or electrical flow then breaks it. That alone allows the parallel batteries to recharge more fully. However it does take quite a long time, and without a diode "which is best not to use" when equalization begins to  happens between the series and parallel the recharging batteries may start to reverse charge, so always a good idea to use the meter every few hours to see how much there recharging. For example on my meter, on DCV it has 2v 20v 200v and 500v. I find if you want to see the numbers actually rise during recharging use the 2v setting on the parallel batteries. Since it reads all three as a single 1.5v battery you can keep up with the 4 digit reading better then say if you have the meter set on 20v. And the numbers do rise,slowly, so its interesting to watch.  Im working on some other modifications and trials,,I may report those here in days or weeks to come, we shall see. Feel free to post your own trials here, discussion is welcome. 

stevensrd1

you know I did another run with the same setup but instead of the pulse motor,,I used a smaller size cd motor,not the pulse motor,,and seems good results in charging so far. Odd I recall trying that before with worse results. Anyway was just two running the motor in series and two charging in parallel on this test. Both positives from series and parallel bundles went to motor, both negatives from series and parallel bundles connected together, So many ways to try it all right, Of course the pulse motor is good for getting some back emf when using it with a transformer, good luck with the experimenting.

stevensrd1

You know this last experiment is quite a strange one, I spoke of it an article or two up, about two bats draining and two charging with just a regular motor. Anyway from my readings not only are the charging bats charging up nicely but my main draining bats are charging up. I will assume the reason for this is because since my charging bats, the more they charge the harder it is for the main bats to force electron flow, so the slowing of electron flow is showing an increase in power in the main bats, since they would be draining less because of this. Be this wrong or not, the motor which has a glue stick on the rotor, so I can see it spin, shows no signs of slowing from looks, of course I dont have a speed tester to tell. Either way the main bats which I test as they are in the running circuit, show no drain but an increase, as do the charging bats. So this experiment will go on for a while, or till I get tired of it and move on to a new one.

stevensrd1

Maybe I should make this a log lol . Anyway as with the last experiment, I let it run all day and night, and the next morning I wrote down my reading for my series and parallel bats. I did start this one, with just the motor with two fully charged and two fully drained batteries. Anyway I swithed the charging bats with the main bats and let it run another day and night, and I seem to have more of a reading in my main bats this time,,and still got the same reading in my charging bats at the end of the charge. So Im about to switch them for another time, this will be the third day I let them run, I think after this run I will move on to something more interesting. Maybe a bedini circuit since I wanted to make one of them.

e2matrix

I haven't had the chance to follow everything you've posted on this but when I first saw it this reminded me of the mechanical Tesla Switch.  Simplified but it has similarities.  I think you are onto something here.  Are you using rechargeable batteries like NiMH or other chemistry?  Have you seen Patrick Kelly's book in chapter 5?  ( Here: http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter5.pdf ) He shows the mechanical Tesla switch that was built by Electrodyne and apparently kept 4 batteries charged while running a large motor for a very long time.