Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Conventional current flow VS Electron current flow

Started by Dave45, March 14, 2014, 08:15:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Dave45 on April 08, 2014, 07:24:23 AM
Yea I noticed the popups, you would think that would be censored or better yet eliminated, I used the site years ago and dont remember the trash being on there then.

I understand what your trying to point out and Im sure it works what Im trying to show is the mechanical function of the field, and as far as all the really smart EE's they use what they have been taught, just like you.

I am trying to show you there is an alternative, has your conventional view showed you how to harvest free energy, in how many years, 150 or so.

So after 150 years of paying for something that is free with no answers in sight wouldnt you think its worth a look.

Dave, the right way to "show an alternative view" is to show that it predicts some kind of behaviour in an experimental system that is _not_ predicted by the conventional view, and then to conduct an experiment that tries to falsify that prediction... and fails to do so. Or looking at it another way, conduct a demonstration that shows the difference between the conventional and alternative predictions on a physical system.
So far, the "alternative views" don't seem to be able to do that. They either can't make coherent predictions about anything, they make the same predictions as the conventional view so aren't useful or interesting, or they fail to make _correct_ predictions about the behaviour of real systems, thus showing that they are not correct views, or at least not as correct as the conventional view.

Worth a look? Sure, show me something interesting that is worth a look. Why do you think I bother to read this forum? I'm looking for something interesting to look at. For example, your ice-coil patterns are interesting.... if they are really caused by the electric field from the coil and not some of the other couple of dozen third variables I can think of that might have influenced the pattern. That's why I asked for an image of a control test with no current but other things equal. You didn't respond so I "assume" that you did no such controls. Please prove me wrong by showing a control freeze, I really am interested and I really don't have room in my own freezer to try it.

Dave45

Yes Iv froze the container's with no current flow and no the organized field is not there.

Something interesting with no current applied the containers bust but with current Iv never had one break.

They say ice doesnt conduct electricity but it will if frozen with a magnetic field applied,

I did an experiment thats proves the existence of the aether years ago using the ice but never repeated or documented it.

Dave45