Free Energy, Critical Thinking, and Skeptics

[truthbeknown]

I don't think so. TinselKoala show us his skepticism and the efficiency of the method: now we know there is a suspicion of fraud about the legitimacy of using IEEE references while IEEE doesn't support the paper in question and rejected it several times.

Hmmmmmm. To those who read here....Am I missing something in the translation? I didn't think exnihiloest accused anybody of anything..It was just stated that Tinselkoala's comment was on topic for this thread....

Oh my my my.....I guess we can get SUED from asking a question? Oh the futility of it all.


J.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And may I add - for the benefit of both exnihiloest and truthbeknown - that I have an enormous appetite for litigation.  I see this as a desirable forum for bringing the facts of ours and other experimental evidence that the public can be alerted to it.  If I am defending my good name or defending myself against allegations of fraud - in both instances I will be in the happy and rather public position of referring to all that experimental evidence.  It will be a means of getting the 'truth known'.

Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

now we know there is a suspicion of fraud about the legitimacy of using IEEE references while IEEE doesn't support the paper in question and rejected it several times.

There is NOTHING ambivalent in that statement.

EDITED  Paul, abject apologies that this subject has been intruded on your own excellent thread.  I have no option but to deal with this and hope you understand.  Hopefully - somehow - this matter is now dealt with.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[spinn_MP]

I don't think so. TinselKoala show us his skepticism and the efficiency of the method: now we know there is a suspicion of fraud about the legitimacy of using IEEE references while IEEE doesn't support the paper in question and rejected it several times.

Yep.

What, "Miss MosFet" is already threatening people with the legal ("I'll sue u!") stuff?
ROTFLMAO!!

Financed with a "17*ou" project, probably...
What a joke...

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Yep.

What, "Miss MosFet" is already threatening people with the legal ("I'll sue u!") stuff?
ROTFLMAO!!

Financed with a "17*ou" project, probably...
What a joke...

Hello Spin.  I took the trouble to read all your posts - just to see what I'm up against here.  I must hand it to you.  You're ALWAYS objectionable.  At least I had a laugh and at least I'm now in a better mood.  I actually enjoyed the miss mosfet thread.  LOL.  Quite witty - here and there in a sort of old men giggling and being disgusting sort of way. 

I don't need to finance anything if I'm defending.  That's always a comfort.  But if I did need to I would certainly NOT use any money from COP>17 technology.  There simply isn't any.  No.  I've been in endless conversation with CID - when our technology was being snaffled by some trolls from another forum.  So I know I little whereof I speak.  And I assure you they're more active than we probably realise.  But mostly against internet  p*** at this stage.

You're dislike of us all is so COMPREHENSIVE.  I suspect if you ever got religion you'd be even more insufferable.  LOL.  But be careful here.  You're siding with Omnibus - in a sort of vicarious way.  I think he'll be the next to add some comment.  But always nice to see your own.  It's just so utterly malicious it's reached a kind of art form.  You've been practising - clearly.

Regards,
Rosemary

Golly.  That was edited?