Relative Permittivity of Water

[Torana]

It is full of many mistakes and Stan was also a Jesus freak which I am not afraid to bash him for.

Why would I waste time writing down all the mistakes here for you to see when you have an extremely condescending attitude? Why would I want to speak to someone like you who is condescending and obnoxious?

What will you gain from it if I provide you with my mistake information I've found?



...... If he found so many mistakes then wouldnt he agree with the post? but no wait hes discovered more mistakes ....and THEN hes saving his pennys for a 9XB.

he must ride the fence raw with that line of thinking.
Im not surprised at all if hes ripped into you on a diff site.

as james randi .....Ive never heard of him before or since , he might be famous in someones villiage but not MYN     

[Torana]

So what the hell... since when permittivity is ohmic resistance?

Water permitivity is not the same as water ohmic resistance...

Minde

this is what started it ...google "78.54 ohms" and it will show the affect stan meyers has had , which is not a good one.
http://nz.bing.com/search?q=78.54+ohms&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IE8SRC

never in my life have I mixed permittivity with ohmic resistance, the numbers I used were from alex petty, naudin and steve (?)  , in no way could I manipulate their figures , plain and simple.

the thread name "Relative Permittivity of Water" .....soon enuff some one was going to post 78.54 OHMS = completely wrong and misguided info spread by stan meyers .

It is BOGUS!! 

[Torana]

Whatever you say man... I see no point to argue with you here.
Appereantly many of your "dictionaries" are wrong. Because dielectric is NOT the same as ohmic insulator.. altho all insulators have dielectric values but thats not the same as ohmic value.
It is the way it is and no dictionaries can change that.
I just wish you kept your personal theories to yourself.. so many others would not be misguided by reading your posts..

No dictionary any where in the world states dielectric being measured in ohms or being an ohmic insulator or having resistive measurement.
therefore  NONE of my "dictionaries" are wrong

I havent put fwd any personal theories so by rights NO ONE should be misguided by reading my posts if any thing they should wake up.

Its humorous how people get bent out of shape.

"dielectric is NOT the same as ohmic insulator.. " ......YET stan meyers pushed that very idea and misguided thousands of people ......and YET no one in the SM flock sayeth a thingeth. 

Its only fitting to redirect the finger and crank it round to point square at stan meyers.

I didnt write the tech brief

[Torana]

Stan Meyers Tech Brief

7-3; "The established dielectric value of water (85) being 78.54 ohms"

7-4: " a resistive liquid (having an ohmic value of 78.54 ohms)

7-8;  "the dielectric property of water (being 78.54 ohms @ 25c )

a resistive liquid ??   ohmic value??

.......cccrank  goes the finger!

canufi would put that down as a spelling mistake or microfiche or even human error.
the tech brief IS intentional deception, the standard key board does not have the OMEGA symbol, thats TYPE SETTING  NOT human error at all .

1 Omega = ohms
2 Resistive is spelt a whole lot diff from dielectric
its intentional to use 1 or the other word , stan used both!

theres too much type set "human error" that its a human error to consider the tech brief of any value at all.

no one has ever designed ,developed,built and patented a circuit without knowing fundamental electrical theory and then been unable to explain how their circuit works whilst at the same time referring to SAMS mod dict of electronics (1984)

steve meyers also cant find the words to describe a circuit function, funny that

[Torana]

w,
those are trigger coils = self reso of the core. http://www.powerlabs.org/flybackdriver.htm
supposedly Horvath patent had a self reso transformer but the patent drawing is wired NOT to work , its totally stuffed circuit drawing.

horvath circ has UJT timer =predates 555 chip mfg.

flat FBT coils are the AC type = hard to find
tall FBT coils are DC out put type already reactified
BJT transistors run hot not many use them anymore