Relative Permittivity of Water

[Torana]

I already linked wire gauges ...Have you read this thread??
be specific...where did I lie??   conspiracy = I have put dictionary definition, very fitting too.
No where have I said Stan Meyers info is "textbook"   clearly I have linked to info , it is personal choice to learn and evaluate his "info".
What I have written is text book and theres a good reason for that , YOU missed it!

Any one can break down distilled water - try it- Ive already written about- Have you read this thread??
I HAD to google James Randi... am I supposed to know who magicians are?? He might be famous in someones world but not myn

Figured out the formula for Naphthalene yet?
Have you actually read SM info yourself or just skim and skip the top??

use the pdf search tool!    VERY easy to do

[Torana]

Tell you what,  why dont you go to ionizationx, RWG and T woodside and ask them if they have the "numbers" Eugene Mallove was asking from stan for.

while your there tell **THEM** " humans make mistakes like this , stan made too many of them"
heres links right here , dare to step up , why not go with the flow? ask away

http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php

http://www.open-source-energy.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4

Are YOU armed with enough evidence to back up that statement and differentiate what those mistakes actually were?  while being specific at the same time.

Arent they the ones who NEED to know what info you pocess?

[Torana]

  "BUM Rate" is written with 3 capitals ....its rivetting stuff!  have you actually read the WFC tech Brief?
BURN rate has 4 capitals ....use the pdf search tool , aint no mistake.

Where have I been "whinning and complaining"??   be specific

what have I got to complain about and who to??

thats the 2nd time youve said it followed up with zip!
we both know you havent read this thread ....IT ...is text book info and theres a reason for that.
I have quoted SM word for word , no where have I ripped into SM,  try and find an example.
because I have no praise for him it must be stan bashing?

why is it intolerable for SM devotees to see this info on display?
It is complete freedom of choice , Ive put links every where...just have to move the mouse!

why has no one put a thread to up to back up SM tech brief to the fullest?   

Have you heard of Eugene Mallove or Walter Rosenthal?   essential figures and both dead!

James Randi, Penn and Teller or David Copperfield are irrelevent...hardly subject matter!

****What user name are you going by in ionizationx or RWG ??     Im interested how well your going to go down.  I personally cant wait till your 9XB turns up.

All the best , Pard'ner!

[canufi]

Tell you what,  why dont you go to ionizationx, RWG and T woodside and ask them if they have the "numbers" Eugene Mallove was asking from stan for.

I don't participate in those forums because they are full of buffoons including "h2opower" who is a racist american that thinks canadians are stupid, and that americans are smart. In fact quite the opposite: the southern jesus loving rednecks in the U.S.A. are stupid.

Are YOU armed with enough evidence to back up that statement and differentiate what those mistakes actually were? 

Look up the BWG system, Stan was using BWG instead of AWG and mixing and matching numbers where he shouldn't have.

I already told you to look at BWG but you just ignored it and kept rambling on about how you've provided the wire information. What you didn't realize was that there is a direct correlation to BWG figures with Stan's mistakes saying it was AWG.

Even if the guages of wires is off by a bit, this doesn't mean the fuel cell won't work, it would just be a different coil producing a different behavior.

The system can be scaled down to smaller wires or scaled up to big wires.

[canufi]

we both know you havent read this thread ....IT ...is text book info and theres a reason for that.

Obviously you aren't familiar with BWG text books (british wiring gauge) and SWG which humans can make mistakes about mixing and matching american gauge with british gauge.

I guess you just aren't smart enough to look at a Bwg gauge and compare it to AWG to see that Stan made simple mistakes. Yes he shouldn't have made the mistakes but at least they are obvious enough to solve.

It doesn't matter about the exact gauge of wire you use any way. It can be slightly different and still work.

You are smearing Stan because he made plenty of mistakes which is equivalent to criticizing a German for not knowing perfect English and using "vill" instead of "will".  Yes, it is annoying when humans make stupid mistakes. you make them too. Fool.