Overunity.com Archives

Energy from Natural Resources => Gravity powered devices => Topic started by: iacob alex on November 23, 2010, 07:17:43 AM

Title: Fancy vs. reality...
Post by: iacob alex on November 23, 2010, 07:17:43 AM

.....can be  a "mirror image",a comparative reflexion between your "new thing"( a possible gravity motor...) and a short claim of the actual technology.

     You can find an interesting and essential condition about this field of inquiry at:   http://peswiki.com/energy/Directory:Gravity_Motors

     This is: "...to achieve a full 360 rotation,with acceleration between  each complete turn".

     Let's notice (and test,especially!) a simple fact:

        -a full up-down (180 degrees) pendular fall (small friction),can rise the bob to about ~330 degees.

        -if we "add" at the top (starting) position  a certain push (starting velocity)...we can "achieve more than a full 360 rotation".

     We can think that,for a pendulum-like arrangement,apparently...we have a single problem: how to imagine ,get away a "self-addition" of acceleration,or rotation with acceleration!?

       All the best! / Alex
Title: Re: Fancy vs. reality...
Post by: ramset on November 23, 2010, 08:14:33 AM
Sir ,
Any thoughts on this?

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10034.0

Thanks,

Chet
Title: Re: Fancy vs. reality...
Post by: iacob alex on November 23, 2010, 09:25:16 AM

     Hi Ramset !

This movie  (Robert33),and some comments regarding this topic is interesting...

  The main problem remains the question of power source:primary,it's the gravity fall,in my opinion.

  The "magnetic solution" takes advantage of very strong magnets (a limited source,storage...),but very small torque.

   Maybe,in the future ,this magnetic repulsion pulse,can be a "key" to solve "smoothly"  the mechanical long arm-short arm switch,in a classical /mechanical motor.

  Let's call it a "hybrid" system...

        All the best! / Alex
Title: Re: Fancy vs. reality...
Post by: iacob alex on June 26, 2012, 05:33:24 PM
 
.....or usually,a fancy must be tempered with reality.
But,if the "fancy" appears to be a "reality",in the same time?
Take a look at:
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMXurB0OisI&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMXurB0OisI&feature=related)
We have:
-a fulcrum/support/pivot
-a rotating lever,due to a moving mass on the arm.
   All the best! / Alex
Title: Re: Fancy vs. reality...
Post by: johnny874 on June 26, 2012, 09:33:14 PM
   Alex,
Trains that move @ 300 kph use mag lev.

    Jim
Title: Re: Fancy vs. reality...
Post by: iacob alex on September 04, 2012, 02:15:05 PM
 
         Hi Jim !
Keeping  the old,classic point of view about a possible (impossible?!) gravity powered device,we must play gravity fall and inertia...so mechanics,only.
If we add the magnetic play ..it's interesting,but the "skeleton" design,must be firstly..."pure" mechanics.
My suggestion::try to play a "modified" trebuchet (in the top position.it can "throw"the short arm into a long arm...)
       All the best! / Alex
     
Title: Re: Fancy vs. reality...
Post by: iacob alex on September 16, 2012, 12:16:46 PM
.....we can start  with a fancy,an illusion of continuous  motion due to gravity,inertia ...and a "hidden" electric battery ,at :
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q_Nz63k-Ww&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Q_Nz63k-Ww&feature=related)
  but this decorative object,can it be easy modified into a practical self-moving one ,due to gravity  fall and rotationalinertia,only !?
        All the best! / Alex
     
Title: Re: Fancy vs. reality...
Post by: iacob alex on January 17, 2017, 11:28:09 AM
.....or from : http://m.imgur.com/gallery/G81ZVTI
     to : www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text032.jpg
     and...back !
     As simple as possible : a test can upset a lot of words...
     Al_ex