.....due to an alternating energy transfer,between gravity and inertia,you can find on net ,at :
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GHnN4yD934
This is an apparently "self",beyond any doubt:we made a pick up and...time is the limitation.
The simplicity of this test (mass,arm,flywheel ),is so attractive...to stimulate our thinking and imagination,for a real "self-acting" motion.
The "classical bet" is the same :fall down,on a long arm vs. rise up ,on a short arm ,between the same gravitational levels (height...from down to up).
As usually ,the test is first,the lesson is after...
All the best! / Alex
.....at : www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text047.jpg
Al_ex
.....for a simple hinged arm ( remind the Middle Ages designs...) , playing short arm due to gravity and long arm , due to (rotational) inertia , in the top point , as you can see at :
http://cdn.phys.org/newman/gfx/news/hires/2013/causalentrop.png
Al_ex
yes Alex:
here we go:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWJHcI7UcuE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWJHcI7UcuE)
Double:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6vr1x6KDaY&feature=relmfu (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6vr1x6KDaY&feature=relmfu)
Triple:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep2lNMic_fk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ep2lNMic_fk)
even with pneumatic control:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4c7AwHFkT8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4c7AwHFkT8)
Finally:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPf_6y0g1xk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPf_6y0g1xk)
does movement along iso-gravitational focefiel-lines needs work `? Yes of course but hwo much in comparison to the potential energy achieved ?
Regards
Kator01
.....as an asymmetric swinging motion of a pendulum equivalent , on an încline plane , at :
https://youtu.be/KOyhl4FkOAY (https://youtu.be/KOyhl4FkOAY)
.....as a "self-recharging" procedure of a "free" inverted pendulum equivalent ( " wheel " ) on a horizontal plane , at :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text013.jpg (http://www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text013.jpg)
Al_ex