I am starting this new thread to focus on the coming experiments.
The two other threads:
Lee-Tseung Lead-out energy Theory and
Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets
got too large. (Over 100 pages) It is almost impossible for the new comer to understand what is going on.
Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited (Hong Kong)
Yeah over 100 pages of your CRAP.
Don't forget to mention that you are a DELUSIONAL CLOWN :)
LETS START HERE:
Quote from: ltseung888 on December 28, 2010, 10:33:04 AM
COP (peak-to-peak or rms) > 200 has been achieved.
and you know all about clowns. and you continue to prove it :D
Happy New Year to all!
Billy
The planned six conclusive experiments in 2011 to be done in USA
1. Two or more tuning forks in resonance or sympathetic vibration. The sound produced by two or more identical tuning forks sound louder and lasts longer than when one is struck alone The question is - where does the extra energy come from? The Tseung hypothesis states that the extra energy comes from ordering the random motion of the gas molecules to a pulsing order. The gas molecules have kinetic energy according to the well accepted Kinetic Theory of Gases. This means that even when sound travels through air, the pulsing or vibration orders the random motion of the molecules and leads-out or brings-in the kinetic energy of the gas molecules. This gives us a new understanding of resonance. External energy is brought into the system. This confirms the correctness of the Lead-out or bring-in energy theory.
2. Leading-out or bringing-in gravitational energy. The conclusive experiment was first observed by Mr. Lee Cheung Kin in December 2004 when he stared at his pendulum swinging toy. Mr. Lawrence Tseung did the mathematics and concluded that two part of horizontal energy can lead-out one part of vertical or gravitational energy. So long as there is tension in the string, gravitational energy can be lead-out. The swinging pendulum toy from the market is a readily available prototype. To convert it to an energy extraction device, the amplitude of the swing should be large and operating at the “hitting the rim†positions. This can be confirmed by the Milkovic two stage pendulum video 6 seen on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC6Qlj1Mbo8
3. Leading-out or bringing-in magnetic energy. If we can lead-out or bring-in gravitational energy from a pulse-pushed pendulum, we must be able to extract magnetic energy from a magnetic pendulum. This is the famous Ms. Forever Yuen magnetic pendulum experiment. The ordinary pendulum was replaced by a magnet. Another magnet is place below it to provide either an attracting or repelling field. The period of oscillation will change. A magnetic field is much easier to control than the gravitational field. We can change its direction, its magnitude and even turn it on or off. The smallest magnet comes from the orbiting electron around the nucleus. There are trillions of atoms (and hence electrons) surrounding us. If sound resonance can lead-out or bring-in the kinetic energy of the moving molecules, electrical resonance (LCR resonance) should be able to bring out the electron motion energy of the atoms.
4. Listening to the sound energy of a resonating transformer. This conclusive experiment will be defined and directed by an overunity.com forum member â€" Observer. When one designs a transformer, one should avoid the resonance condition. In this case, Observer deliberately sets the vibrating source frequency to that of the transformer or toroid. A loud noise is heard at the resonance frequency. No sound will be heard at a higher or lower frequency. Approximately the same electrical energy is supplied at different frequencies. This can be explained from our understanding of the swing â€" if the pushing is not at the correct time (or frequency), the swing will not go very high.
5. The pulse rotating wheel. The pulse pushed oscillation motion can be changed into a rotational motion to achieve a much higher efficiency. This can be demonstrated in the Tong or the Bedini wheel. Mr. John Bedini demonstrated a large fourteen feet wheel and got the participants to build a small 3 magnet device at the Bedini Ferris Wheel Motor - at the Renaissance Conference - November 14th 2010. See http://prezi.com/pmtiqicgve1z/bedini-ferris-wheel-motor/
6. The FLEET (Forever Lead-out Electromagnetic Energy Transformer). If we can lead-out electron motion energy via moving devices, we should be able to do the same with flux change devices. The initial idea was to experiment with a “Pulsed DC transformer with Embedded Magnetsâ€. That has evolved to the more general LCR resonance tuning on toroidal transformers. The pulsing was done with a Joule Thief Circuit. This is probably the cheapest demonstration device. The components cost less than USD3 and can be purchased or ordered on-line. The prototypes can be tuned with the help of two oscilloscopes displaying the instantaneous Input and Output Power waveforms. This experiment is being verified in multiple locations at present. COP (peak-to-peak or rms) > 200 has been achieved.
With Blessing from the Almighty, these six conclusive experiments will convince the scientists to do more investigation and research. The Lead-Out or Bring-in Energy theory will be accepted. Practical Machines will be built to benefit the World.
Hey CLOWN that are WORDS not Experiments.
Where are the experiments ?
Equipment for Experiment 1
I have located a supplier for the tuning fork on resonance boxes.
However, a Physics Professor said that he may be able to get 4 units from his undergraduate student laboratory. There is no need to purchase anything. I would just owe him a favor.
I might still get it for political reasons.
Quote from: XS-NRG on December 28, 2010, 08:24:02 PM
Hey CLOWN that are WORDS not Experiments.
Where are the experiments ?
I guess you missed the video that is in that post. Other than that the rest of the experiments was easy for me to google.
Thank you Itseung888!!! A lot of that verified or at least helped to solidify the theories that I thought I had come up with!
No not the tunning forks CLOWN.
THE ACHIEVED COP> 200 !!!!!!!!!!
Where is it.
I'm coasting on level ground on my bicycle, with the brakes on. Suddenly, I release the brakes, and I notice that the bicycle "speeds up", or at least isn't slowing down as fast as before.
Where does the extra energy come from ??? From the same "source" that makes resonant tuning forks sound louder :
REDUCED LOSSES.
Quotewhere does the extra energy come from? The Tseung hypothesis states that the extra energy comes from ordering the random motion of the gas molecules to a pulsing order. The gas molecules have kinetic energy according to the well accepted Kinetic Theory of Gases. This means that even when sound travels through air, the pulsing or vibration orders the random motion of the molecules and leads-out or brings-in the kinetic energy of the gas molecules. This gives us a new understanding of resonance. External energy is brought into the system. This confirms the correctness of the Lead-out or bring-in energy theory.
You have no understanding of resonance at all, which is just too bad because it is a powerful phenomenon WHEN PROPERLY UNDERSTOOD.
Quote from: ltseung888 on December 28, 2010, 10:33:04 AM
The initial idea was to experiment with a “Pulsed DC transformer with Embedded Magnetsâ€. That has evolved to NOTHING exept blinking a couple of LED's
Quote from: TinselKoala on December 29, 2010, 12:39:02 PM
Where does the extra energy come from ??? From the same "source" that makes resonant tuning forks sound louder :
There is no extra energy in your example.
The bike doesn't speed up by itself.
There is only what you put in and a certain degree of efficiency.
Resonance does not provide energy it is nothing but a efficient condition.
Lawrence has no understanding of resonance at all.
History of FLEET testing
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg269186#msg269186
The scattered work shop slides for Experiment 6
For those who want to see the slides without the distractions, click on the following:
Slide 1(1812) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg269811#msg269811
Slide 2(1821) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg269875#msg269875
Slide 3(1824) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg269875#msg269875
Slide 4(1844) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg270094#msg270094
Slide 5(1845) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg270101#msg270101
Slide 6(1847) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg270144#msg270144
Slide 7(1856) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg270249#msg270249
Slide 8(1857) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg270250#msg270250
Slide 9(1861) http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg270285#msg270285
The above slides should give the serious experimenter enough hints to build a FLEET prototype. He can do some tuning if he has two good oscilloscopes.
Other helpful informations include:
1. How to make a Joule Thief: http://www.evilmadscientist.com/article.php/joulethief
2. The correct way to measure Input and Output Energy via the 2 oscilloscopes: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg269733#msg269733
3. Brief History of FLEET testing: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg269186#msg269186
4. Our FLEET and tuning experiments: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg269529#msg269529
5. The Planned six conclusive experiments to be done in USA: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg268593#msg268593
6. The best prototype in USA: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg268058#msg268058
7. Prototype A to be shipped: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg267627#msg267627
8. Prototype B getting ready: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg268125#msg268125
9. Prototype C to Bob Boyce: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg268136#msg268136
10. Prototype D ready to ship: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg269490#msg269490
11. Description of Experiment 6 â€" Fleet testing: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8825.msg267614#msg267614
Naysayers and Insulter can disrupt but they cannot destroy. Amen.
Lawrence, would you please do the following for me? It's simple and easy.
Pretend that I am an eight-year-old in your class trying to build your Joule Thief and interpret its output. A bright, thinking eight-year-old.
Teacher, please take the photo of the output waveform you show in Slide 9, and just draw a straight horizontal line across it at 1.3 volts (the battery supply voltage).
Now you will see our JT waveform peaks above this line, and valleys below it.
Teacher, please help me estimate the areas in the peaks above the line. Is this area enough to fill in the valleys below the line? To overfill them?
In other words, is the AVERAGE output voltage greater or less than a steady 1.3 volts?
Tinsel,
like i said, keep hoping for an answer from Tseung, you wont get one, nor will he do the tests you asked, all he knows is that "this peak is bigger than that peak = OU !! "
Quote from: milehigh
Yes indeed TinselKoala made an awesome little clip there. It's quite striking how the spike appears in his voltage waveform when he moves his ground clip down the wire and further away from the resistor. It's very evident how this can mess up your measurements.
Now, I am going to go slightly off-top and pose a related question for the masses. The question is why does that voltage spike appear when he moves the ground clip?
Please no cheating from some of the contributors to the forum that we suspect will know the answer. You are excluded from the pop quiz. Why does the spike appear?
Note that if you understand why the spike appears you should be able to appreciate the point made in TK's clip that much more.
MileHigh
what would have been quite striking was tinselkoala actually showing the whole picture. like comparing scope shots showing the trace with
and without the 1ohm resistor...
here is the clip milehigh is high about:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWDfrzBIxoQ