the following is a theory.
if you do not like it,
than instead of complaining,
call your mother.
and tell her that you think about her every day.
because your mother needs to hear positive things from you,
more than strangers need to see negative things from you.
electrons hold energy.
electrons can release their stored energy, as light.
the energy that electrons store and release,
is likely related to electricity.
or at least, related to the energy,
that causes electrons to move, as electricity.
the human nervous system runs on electricity.
sodium is needed by the human nervous system,
because sodium increases the electrical conduction in the nervous system.
negative ions are known to gather in large amounts, in forests.
and around moving bodies of water.
such as a river, or a waterfall.
a negative ion,
is usually an air moisture molecule,
that is carrying an extra electrons.
that means that there are lots of "freed electrons",
in natural settings.
i have a general impression.
what if going too a place that has lots of negative ions,
will make your nervous system perform more efficiently ?
as well as possibly improving your psychological well being?
because being around the negative ions,
could only improve the efficiency,
of the electrical activity,
that your nervous system needs to function.
where being around the positive ionization in large cities,
could only make your nervous system function more poorly.
do to all the "holes" around (positively ionized atoms).
to increase negative ions in your home,
you could install a running fountain.
or store lots of bottled water,
in a room in your home.
or make a copper foil chamber,
and sit inside the chamber while you meditate.
as always.
the worst cost/risk/loss, is very small.
which means there is the equivalent, of no harm.
yet if there is even a small gain,
than that small gain could easily be greater,
than the small cost.
so there is a strong chance that there would be an overall profit.
and a very weak chance,
that the loss would be greater than the profit.
which means that the smart thing to do, is to try it.
and make what use can be made, of it.
it's not really a theory... it's more of a hypothesis.
a distinction is often made in science between theories and hypotheses, which are theories that are not considered to have been satisfactorily tested or proven. yours seems to fit the latter better than the former.
Fair Wiskey-Wisdom in parts,
but I noticed the lack of the correct term Photons.
May I take from this your that you believe we we live in a world, due to modern conveniences mostly, live in a negative-challanged enviroment due to a lack of typical (Naure settings) abundant negative ions ?
Also see here for another method http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10246.0
and
http://www.healthytimesonline.com/archives/reconnect_while_you_sleep.htm
It's not a theory it's clinically proven to work. Basically it's free medicine from earth itself.
Quote from: broli on February 23, 2011, 05:10:30 AM
Also see here for another method http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10246.0
and
http://www.healthytimesonline.com/archives/reconnect_while_you_sleep.htm
It's not a theory it's clinically proven to work. Basically it's free medicine from earth itself.
that's interesting broli, thanks. i would be interested in any info on these studies, especially double blind studies. do you have any?
There's a lot you can find through a simple google search:
Here's one
http://www.geopaatia.ee/sem2008/03_riggs_roy.pdf (http://www.geopaatia.ee/sem2008/03_riggs_roy.pdf)
And another which may be "less" accepted due to no peer review
http://www.esdjournal.com/articles/cober/earth.htm (http://www.esdjournal.com/articles/cober/earth.htm)
Quote from: broli on February 23, 2011, 05:22:56 AM
There's a lot you can find through a simple google search:
Here's one
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15650465
And another which may be "less" accepected due to no peer review
http://www.esdjournal.com/articles/cober/earth.htm (http://www.esdjournal.com/articles/cober/earth.htm)
yeah i know. ;) my apologies, i should have said specifically, not especially. none of the studies i found in my google search were double blind (placebo), those are the ones that interest me. do you have any info on any such studies?
never mind bro, found one, well actually two, posted in the research section of the earthing institute website.
"two studies were double-blind randomized control trials (RCTs), the golden standard in clinical research, to exactly address the questions of placebo and bias. Their methodologies are explained in papers #2 and #4 of the Research section."
that's what i was looking for (i worked for a place that did clinical drug trials) thanks again broli, i wouldn't have looked deeper if not for you presenting some evidences.
I read one but can't find it anymore. I'm sure you can find it if you look hard enough. I have already convinced myself by reading the facts. Even if you're not convinced there's little to no reason from stopping anyone from giving this piss cheap "medicine" a try.
However like mentioned in the other thread I wouldn't recommend using the electrical ground from your home. If if you have a garden it's best to make an alternative ground for this.
Quote from: broli on February 23, 2011, 05:44:30 AM
I read one but can't find it anymore. I'm sure you can find it if you look hard enough. I have already convinced myself by reading the facts. Even if you're not convinced there's little to no reason from stopping anyone from giving this piss cheap "medicine" a try.
However like mentioned in the other thread I wouldn't recommend using the electrical ground from your home. If if you have a garden it's best to make an alternative ground for this.
i'm still reading the research papers.
either way i think i'm covered. i walk barefoot most of the time in the summer, and sleep on the ground often...
edit: here is the link to the earthing institute's research section for those interested. http://www.earthinginstitute.net/index.php/research
Quote from: WilbyInebriated on February 23, 2011, 05:50:01 AM
i walk barefoot most of the time in the summer, and sleep on the ground often...
Sorry, but I had to laugh at that one. With your nick, the "sleep on the ground often", seems to be a given.
Quote from: MrMag on February 23, 2011, 10:34:22 AM
Sorry, but I had to laugh at that one. With your nick, the "sleep on the ground often", seems to be a given.
;D
Quote from: 11:11 on February 22, 2011, 02:34:28 PM
the human nervous system runs on electricity.
sodium is needed by the human nervous system,
because sodium increases the electrical conduction in the nervous system.
Are you sure about that? Controversial New Idea: Nerves Transmits Sound, not Electricity, http://www.livescience.com/1357-controversial-idea-nerves-transmit-sound-electricity.html
GB
Maybe they just need to look at their laws of thermodynamics.
Isn't sound classified as frequencies in the audible range?
I can hear my heart beat and I do have tinnitus, but I can't hear any other sounds (except when I'm hungry).
If it is sound, isn't sound a frequency and doesn't it need a voltage associated with it?
i have chosen to believe,
that the upper half of the human body,
holds a large number of freed electrons.
(or negative ions).
and that the lower half of the human body,
holds a large number of "holes".
(or positive ions).
so it is in perfect agreement,
with my chosen energy-beliefs,
to think that the negative ions in a forest,
boost the function,
of the upper half of the human body.
which includes the brain's ability,
to do mental work.
i have other reasons to believe,
that vibrations,
or sound,
lower the impedence,
that prevents the movement of electrons.
so freed electrons in the atmosphere,
would be more encouraged to move,
to a place that has more sound in it.
and less encouraged to move,
to a place that has less sound in it.
and the higher the frequency of the sound,
the more the impedence is reduced,
the more electrons follow the path of least resistance,
the more freed electrons that gather in that place.
the above explains why many people love music.
because the music is sound.
and sound attracts electrons.
and electrons are more or less negative ions.
and negative ions make humans feel good.
but get this:
the frequencies in the music,
determin what level of negative ions, build up.
so humans who like a higher amount of negative ions,
would like music with higher frequencies of sound.
and humans who like a lower amount of negative ions,
would like music with lower frequencies of sound.
in both cases,
the music has to raise and fall, in order to work.
similar to how a magnetic field has to raise and fall,
in order to induct into a wire coil.
for thousands of years,
humans have known that their musics rythm,
needs to raise and fall.
because if the rythme is bad,
than the music has a weak effect.
and if the music has no rythme,
than the music has no effect.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0688069711
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1453649166
Thanks to Grumpy.
There are some pretty wild tests in these books.
Quote from: 11:11 on February 28, 2011, 04:08:36 PM
i have chosen to believe,
that the upper half of the human body,
holds a large number of freed electrons.
(or negative ions).
and that the lower half of the human body,
holds a large number of "holes".
(or positive ions).
so it is in perfect agreement,
with my chosen energy-beliefs,
to think that the negative ions in a forest,
boost the function,
of the upper half of the human body.
which includes the brain's ability,
to do mental work.
i have other reasons to believe,
that vibrations,
or sound,
lower the impedence,
that prevents the movement of electrons.
so freed electrons in the atmosphere,
would be more encouraged to move,
to a place that has more sound in it.
and less encouraged to move,
to a place that has less sound in it.
and the higher the frequency of the sound,
the more the impedence is reduced,
the more electrons follow the path of least resistance,
the more freed electrons that gather in that place.
the above explains why many people love music.
because the music is sound.
and sound attracts electrons.
and electrons are more or less negative ions.
and negative ions make humans feel good.
but get this:
the frequencies in the music,
determin what level of negative ions, build up.
so humans who like a higher amount of negative ions,
would like music with higher frequencies of sound.
and humans who like a lower amount of negative ions,
would like music with lower frequencies of sound.
in both cases,
the music has to raise and fall, in order to work.
similar to how a magnetic field has to raise and fall,
in order to induct into a wire coil.
for thousands of years,
humans have known that their musics rythm,
needs to raise and fall.
because if the rythme is bad,
than the music has a weak effect.
and if the music has no rythme,
than the music has no effect.
Having been a paraglider I saw how the wind controls the trees and the trees control the wind.
Quote from: gravityblock on February 27, 2011, 08:06:28 PM
Are you sure about that? Controversial New Idea: Nerves Transmits Sound, not Electricity, http://www.livescience.com/1357-controversial-idea-nerves-transmit-sound-electricity.html (http://www.livescience.com/1357-controversial-idea-nerves-transmit-sound-electricity.html)
GB
It's a good hypothesis but it's based on a series of assumptions. For instance the assumptions are:
thermodynamics law are never wrong
electricity has only one form which produces heat
If you look up konstantin meyl you'll find a lecture were he gives some very good reason to why myelin sheaths are a series of nodes. Has something to do with standing and longitudinal waves ala tesla antenna.
Be it a crime
For music sublime
To rise and to fall
With cadence of time?
Nay, be it not!
O banish the thought!
That frequency variance
Be somehow forgot!
The upper half plates
Of negative states
Dance in this flux
With opposite mates.
The lower half charge
In peeps small and large
Of positive ions
Put holes in the barge.
But negative uppers
Make wonderful suppers
Of creative musings
In cranial tuppers.
So turn up the tunes!
Clang the spittoons!
Let music inspire us
To rise from the ruins!
My addition to the discussion...
Bob