Lately we have seen a number of so called over unity devices rearing their heads in the public forum. But have we really? They always seem to follow the same path of confusion and "almost'
there for us to marval at. They are always confusing , are they really OU? Their claims to OU are based on assumption and calculations. There is never a clear cut realization that indeed OU has been discovered. Their "experiments" perports to show OU based on their statements. But does the battery never run down, does the device in plain view always self loop, do they show with out a doubt more power out than in? We have Ismael motors saying that his system is 133% efficient but to be OU it must be 233% efficient because at 133% his battery still runs down? And that he is able to draw on some hidden force to make his device work as well as his MEG miscalculations.
The nonsense with Steorn, Mylow, coils causing a LED to light up ( ever heard of a crystal radio?),
Rossi with his cold fusion device that uses a hidden element to make it "work". One would think that if this was factual it would be world news. It either works or is does not. This list goes on and on.
A real OU device will be the essence if simplicity. The device does self loop, the battery does not wear down it will be simple to understand and not require complex experiments to "prove" that
OU is indeed taking place. Its like say " somewhat pregnant" it either is or is not.
Lets all hope that someday that goal will be achieved!
Bill
Don't forget the 'TurXator"..... :-\
Thats what i've been trying to tell people... but lately its been in vein, so much so that someone (i.e forum moderator) has been deleting my posts out right with no explanation what so ever....
people do find the truth hard to handle in this forum.... thats for sure...
watch out, this thread could be whipped from existence and you won't ever find out why (other than the blinding obvious)
*pretends to be the forum admins* 'don't rock the boat sunny jim'
hehe