Scalar waves (longitudinal EM waves) are absolutely real , and were discovered by Tesla. They have been suppressed by mainstream science , outside of black budget projects. I suggest taking a look at my post over at OUR for more information...
Konstantin Meyl - Tesla Scalar Waves
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722 (http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722)
Quote from: Feynman on March 13, 2011, 04:40:52 PM
Scalar waves (longitudinal EM waves) are absolutely real , and were discovered by Tesla. They have been suppressed by mainstream science , outside of black budget projects. I suggest taking a look at my post over at OUR for more information...
Konstantin Meyl - Tesla Scalar Waves
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722 (http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722)
This is a very interesting topic but some have leveled pretty hard critique both regarding the theoretical background (http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_15_2_bruhn.pdf or http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_16_3_bruhn.pdf) and the experimental setup offered by Meyl (http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/Experiments/E-Abschlussbericht_Meyl-Experimentierset.pdf). I still cannot decide one way or the other about the veracity of these claims (there are so many other pressing things to do). So, someone who's really interested in this should really study he matter thoroughly and should come up with a conclusive statement about this matter.
Now, even a brief look at Bruhn's argument indicates that it cannot be conclusive despite the inherent claim that it is. The reason being, Bruhn's understanding (and that's the underlying thesis in his argument) that any claim in the area of electromagnetism should abide by Maxwell's equations. That should at once be considered unacceptable because Maxwell's equations cannot account, for instance, for the measured voltage in the unipolar (Faraday) generator. What is done as a palliative measure is to invoke the expression for the Lorentz force as a way to account for the observed voltage. Lorentz force, however, cannot be derived from Maxwell's equations and it should if those equations are to be considered descriptive of the electromagnetic phenomena. This is a serious flaw of Maxwell's equations to the extent of falsifying them. For now they are used just because it's the tradition to do so. Whether or not scalar wave theory or Weber's or maybe Hertz' theory can replace them (even Ampere's theory, available at the time when Maxwell's theory appeared, is more general than Maxwell's theory) remains to be seen. At this point electrodynamics is facing a dead-end and something urgently has to be done to get it back on the right and productive track.
Quote from: Omnibus on March 13, 2011, 05:16:06 PM
This is a very interesting topic but some have leveled pretty hard critique both regarding the theoretical background (http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_15_2_bruhn.pdf or http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_16_3_bruhn.pdf) and the experimental setup offered by Meyl (http://www.gravitation.org/institute_of_gravity_research/Experiments/E-Abschlussbericht_Meyl-Experimentierset.pdf). I still cannot decide one way or the other about the veracity of these claims (there are so many other pressing things to do). So, someone who's really interested in this should really study he matter thoroughly and should come up with a conclusive statement about this matter.
That's what I'm trying to do now, and offering to the forum my findings. Only been at this for the past two weeks seriously trying to get to the bottom of where the so-called 'Free Energy' comes from.
Quote
Now, even a brief look at Bruhn's argument indicates that it cannot be conclusive despite the inherent claim that it is. The reason being, Bruhn's understanding (and that's the underlying thesis in his argument) that any claim in the area of electromagnetism should abide by Maxwell's equations. That should at once be considered unacceptable because Maxwell's equations cannot account, for instance, for the measured voltage in the unipolar (Faraday) generator.
Right on.
Quote
What is done as a palliative measure is to invoke the expression for the Lorentz force as a way to account for the observed voltage. Lorentz force, however, cannot be derived from Maxwell's equations and it should if those equations are to be considered descriptive of the electromagnetic phenomena.
This is a serious flaw of Maxwell's equations to the extent of falsifying them. For now they are used just because it's the tradition to do so.
Apparently written by Maxwell (1865)
- Heavyside (1880 curtailed model)
- Lorentz (1880's further symmetrized)
From Tom Beardens' website:
"It's also easy to see that, prior to Lorentz's ARBITRARY
symmetrical regauging of the Maxwell-Heaviside equations, those equations prescribe both EM systems in equilibrium with their active environment, and EM systems not in equilibrium with it.
The latter systems are permitted by the thermodynamics of open disequilibrium systems to perform five magic functions: (1) self-order, (2) self-oscillate or self-rotate, (3) output more
energy than the operator inputs (the active environment inputs
the rest of it), (4) power itself and its load (the active
environment inputs all the energy, like a windmill), and (5)
exhibit negentropy. That is a well-established thermodynamics.
Lorentz arbitrarily discarded all such open disequilibrium EM
systems in order to get simpler equations having analytical
solutions and not requiring numerical methods. So he simply
scrapped all the really interesting and challenging EM systems in Maxwell's theory. ARBITRARILY!"
And
"We now visualize the formation of waves of pure stress in the
spacetime medium (in the vacuum). These we call scalar EM waves,
Tesla waves, electrogravitational waves, longitudinal EM waves,
waves of pure potential, electrostatic/magnetostatic waves, and
zero-vector EM waves. All these terms are synonymous. Each sheds
its own particular light upon the nature of these waves or of
their original discoverer, Nikola Tesla." Tom Bearden
Quote
Whether or not scalar wave theory or Weber's or maybe Hertz' theory can replace them (even Ampere's theory, available at the time when Maxwell's theory appeared, is more general than Maxwell's theory) remains to be seen. At this point electrodynamics is facing a dead-end and something urgently has to be done to get it back on the right and productive track.
Tom Bearden points this out in his video - possibly number 7 or 8 of the series. He reckons new found results that are replicable - (The russians built a SEG with the same repeatable and observable results as obtained in John Searl's SEG's) means the current 'model' has to be modified - not scrapped - to incorporate those new found results into an updated model.
It's NOT a scientific method of research to discredit repeatable experiments just because they will not fit into the current model - which has been seriously pruned anyway.
For further reading I'm taking notes as I watch videos and read interesting stuff on the internet.
Quote from: Feynman on March 13, 2011, 04:40:52 PM
Scalar waves (longitudinal EM waves) are absolutely real , and were discovered by Tesla. They have been suppressed by mainstream science , outside of black budget projects. I suggest taking a look at my post over at OUR for more information...
Konstantin Meyl - Tesla Scalar Waves
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722 (http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=754.msg11722#msg11722)
That looks good Feynman. I'll get my head round that ASAP :o