I have seen some information about the "Single Wire energy transmission" of power. I'm interested in discussing here how this technique exactly works.
I'm not very expert in electronics, so I hope someone can explain better how it can be accomplished.
Hi, I always try to think of electricity like it is water, or maybe even superfluid or gas. Then it all suddenly starts to make sense.
In this case:
Take 2 rubber balls, connect them with hose. When you squeeze one ball other inflates and if you let go other deflates. In the hose you got Alternating Current (AC) movement of fluid or gas. This is how simplest single hose transmission works :P
Add some one-way valves and there's Avramenko.
hi,
I just thought to bump this old thread with interesting experiment -
The Avramenko plug and one wire power transmission
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE5cka9ddFs
Regards
If you build it you must check it with original Avramenko proof of concept by cutting the single input wire and making a knot without copper connection anymore. I checked it and it works like that !
http://jnaudin.free.fr/avramenko/avramenk.htm
Here open source experimenter/researcher Jaguar reinvestigates similar work of Dr.Stiffler ( there are several topics here somewhere....
https://www.beyondunity.org/thread/spatial-energy-coherence-circuit/ (https://www.beyondunity.org/thread/spatial-energy-coherence-circuit/)
Respectfully
Chet K
Here is an interesting Russian video of Avramenko plug i reuploaded on my channel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy1_J7ZjP7M
But people make a mistake when implying that metal casing of a capacitor is not closing a circuit, as it has been correctly stated in youtube comments on a video where capacitor supposedly discharges twice, through the case and directly....case IS a capacitor plate relative to inner plate. It is two capacitors in one.
BTW good place to remind TRIAC dimmer needs a DIAC (which is not two Zeners back to back) to operate symmetrically since TRIAC is not a symetrical device.
And since Avramenko circuits usually work at radio frequencies, it is good to occasionally revisit radio antenna principles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iInJkG8YPkA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHSPRcRgmOw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-F7KYLO4Bkg
"Avramenko's experiment is a series of experiments on the transmission of electricity through a single wire. Theoretically, the transfer of energy over a single wire is impossible, however, when transferring electricity using the Avramenko method, the current flows not through the conductor, but over its surface. As a result, the power of the transmitted energy does not depend in any way on the material and thickness of the wires. It can be very small, while the conductors do not heat up"
This post contains my thoughts on the subject.
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2023/01/blog-post_11.html
From Frolov's paper about Avramenko
"Length of the wire must be corresponding to some resonance value. In resonance case potential changes in the point O are maximum."
https://www.energythic.com/usercontent/3/2009.11.02_EN_Theory_EnergyThic_Work_Created_by_Means_of_Potential_Field.pdf
If wire has to be resonant length, that is not a single wire transmission, that is capacitive coupling to ground. But still, there is potential here to harness radiant energy, altho i consider this idea inferior.
Below are also Dynatron's ideas along similar lines. User Vasiliy here claimed Dynatron is a scammer.
https://overunity.com/8219/don-smiths-device-9/msg324083/#msg324083
BTW Here is another example how lack of understanding of induction leads to flawed ideas.
Frolov's "lenzless" transformer, he suggest that since secondaries are on opposing sides of the toroid and their induced fluxes oppose they will cancel out. This is of course wrong, they will not cancel each other, they both oppose the primary flux.
http://alexfrolov.narod.ru/ph-machine.htm