This fellow has a track record for years with videos and results and peer review.
If you can't stand the theory go down to section 6.
http://philica.com/display_article.php?article_id=219
Yes, I know what this machine looks like but that guy didn't have the math to optimize it.
Garry
read to the end!
It clearly states 1.07 KW ;D
Garry
Wow Seems like this should get a bit more attention!
Thanks for posting a very timely topic,which could definately
benifit from some more knowing eyes!
Thanks
Chet
PS
For the sake of Clarity,What previous machine are you refering to?
This is a dead ringer for one of Joseph Newman's motor's that I tried about 20 years ago. The rotating magnet inside a single coil. Joe had one motor that weighed a ton but only put out about 80 watts usable extra energy. Since it would never pay out I tried new directions. This professor has always done what he said he was going to and always published the results.
Garry
I have never been inside a bike generator. The coil and cap have to be resonant at the speed the shaft rotates. It would be nice to be done at 60hz :) Even though the output is not a perfect sine wave most things would never know.
[reviewer #2355unconfirmed user] added 14th May, 2011 at 10:00:19
The author obviously does not know much about theoretical physics.
As an example he does not know that classical physics is not self-consistent.
Peculiarly, the Gauss equation is not consistent with other classical concepts.
The author has just found another example of inconsistence, his analysis is a shame for the community.
The author should learn quantum mechanics.
A good starting point would be Feynman Lectures On Physics (the volumes on quantum mechanics), where the author shows another example of self-inconsistence of classical physics, peculiarly of magnetism equations.
As a conclusion, the author’s analysis is wrong.
He should withdraw its article from the site, so as not to spread FUD among non physicist.
[reviewer #2355unconfirmed user] added 14th May, 2011 at 10:00:19
hi guys
to balance up that report from a negative reviewer of the Turtur design...
it looks to me like the coil/ magnet arrangement is VERY similar to the concept which the physicist Leon Dragone reported in a paper of his
Dragone unfortunately died, so we can't find out more than is in his paper, but he does specifically say that he observed overunity behaviour in a diametric magnet rotating within an enclosing solenoid coil
i think this is even without a cap to resonate the coil
having seen Romero's device stick two fingers up to 'conventional science' i'd be quite interested to give the Turtur/Dragone idea a go, too
first things first - the Muller replication!
cheers
np
http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com (http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com)
test