http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=8628 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=8628)
...
"The paper presents a thought experiment in which it has been proven that, on the basis of the observed trajectory of a light pulse in a moving space ship with a constant speed, it is in theory possible to determine the speed of the system. We conclude from this that Einstein’s principle of relativity is not valid."
...
by
Janusz DrożdżyÅ,,ski
University of WrocÅ,aw, WrocÅ,aw, Poland
your going to need to do the experiment be for you have proof of anything.
cern has data, it conflicts with other data but at least they have a measurement
of FTL.
fritznien
which "real" experiments?
These "thought experiments" were invented by this (officially) great genius: Einstein.
Now, another guy is disproving Saint Einstein using the same kind of reasoning.
What an amusement...
By The Way (BTW), another guy has also disproved Georg Cantor using Cantor's shenanigans.
Cantor? The guy who said that there are infinite sets more larger than others!
So, there must be some zeros most nil than others. :P
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor)
QuoteIn one of his earliest papers, Cantor proved that the set of real numbers is
"more numerous" than the set of natural numbers; this showed, for the first time, that there exist infinite sets of different sizes, some infinite sets being
larger than others.
Most of scientists are pathetic....
Very Best
nobody took Albert seriously until the eclipse results he predicted came in.
GR and SR have been tested in many experiments, the cern neutrino experiment being just
the latest.when you have real data to back this up you can order you tux to wear for your Nobel.
good luck with that.
fritznien
Quote from: fritznien on November 27, 2011, 09:36:10 PM
nobody took Albert seriously until the eclipse results he predicted came in.
GR and SR have been tested in many experiments, the cern neutrino experiment being just
the latest.when you have real data to back this up you can order you tux to wear for your Nobel.
good luck with that.
fritznien
more like nobody took albert seriously until eddington got behind him... ::)
furthermore, the claims of eddington (that observations of the 1919 south american solar eclipse confirmed einstein's predicted gravitational attraction of light) which brought einstein his first acclaim and greatest fame were given unassailable refutations by columbia university astronomer c.l. poor. in 1922,'26 & '30... refutations that still stand to this day.
you einsteinians are so religulous... ;)
Albert Einstein accidentally inverted the substances of Light and the Expansion Acceleration of Mass (Gravity) in his Energy equation.
A = Gravitational Acceleration
Z = Time of Particle (Electron) Orbit
A x Z = Velocity of Light (Velocity of Gravity)
In scientific circles, a calculation that has not been known is that the product of;
Wavelength * Frequency = Speed of Gravity
AZ^2 * 1/Z = AZ
is parallel to
Gravitational Acceleration x Orbit Time = Speed of Gravity
A * Z = AZ
The results are exactly equal, however the units are not.
In the true energy equation, Wavelength is comparable to Gravitational Acceleration (A) and Frequency is comparable to Orbit Time (Z). When Frequency (1/Z) is changed into Orbit Time (Z) the Wavelength is not also just flipped to the inverse, rather the AZ^2 of Wavelength is then changed into Acceleration (A). Wavelength is represented by Orbit Diameter (AZ^2)
Earth's Gravity (9.80175174 m/s^2) x earth's Orbit Time (30,585,600 seconds, exact lunar year) = the Velocity of Gravity and Light (299,792,458 m/s). <-------------- Is this just a coincidence? I don't think so.
The Scientific Community is not yet aware that Wavelength = Orbit Diameter = Acceleration of Gravity x (Orbit Time)^2
The Scientific Community is not yet aware that Frequency = 1/Orbit Time
q = Photonic-Mass
A = Gravitational Acceleration
Z = Time of Particle (Electron) Orbit
Acceleration x Time is the complete foundational reality (root core) of Velocity. And in the equation;
2 m/s^2 * 5 seconds = 10 m/s
Acceleration * Time = Velocity
The value for Acceleration is not a Constant. It is simply the root of the foundational equation for Velocity. But because Mr. Planck did not fully understand the True Energy equation, E = q(AZ)^2, he was led to believe that he had found a Constant. Planck's Constant is not a Constant. It is simply the physics reality known as Action, which is (Energy x Time or a Joule-Second).
An object cannot obtain a Velocity without first Accelerating. Acceleration^2 x Time^2 is the complete foundational reality of Velocity^2. Light does not reach the velocity of 299,792,458 m/s instantaneously. In true and pure Physics Acceleration x Time = Velocity, V=AT. An object absolutely cannot possess Velocity without previously having experienced Acceleration. A car cannot be traveling down the road at a high Velocity without at some previous time having gone through a period of Acceleration. Plain and simple physics. There must be some Acceleration somewhere within Albert's Velocity of Light which is the "c" in E=mc2. Within Albert's Velocity there must exist a unit of Acceleration x Time. Light only appears to have an instantaneous velocity because it's true velocity is zero relative to the expansion acceleration of the universe. Three U.S.-born scientists won the Nobel Prize in physics Tuesday for discovering that the universe is expanding at an accelerating pace (http://news.yahoo.com/3-win-nobel-showing-universe-speeding-192640314.html;_ylt=ArOJtAavQy1i9yE_I0GTiIQPLBIF;_ylu=X3oDMTNzczBnOGY1BG1pdANUb3BTdG9yeSBTY2llbmNlU0YEcGtnAzgzNGVjYWU3LTNiNDUtM2Y3ZS05YWFhLWRlZmFmYjAxN2IwYQRwb3MDNQRzZWMDdG9wX3N0b3J5BHZlcgMzNTAzMzE3MC1lZWMzLTExZTAtYmI1Zi0xYWI2YzI1ZmJjOGY-;_ylg=X3oDMTFsMmxkdGs2BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANzY2llbmNlBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25z;_ylv=3).
Albert Einstein's inverted energy equation states that Light has a velocity. But what Albert didn't realize is that his proposed velocity of light, was actually the Expansion Acceleration of Mass moving past stationary Light particles. Mass is moving past stationary Light particles via Expansion Acceleration.
The definition of Time is: The earth orbiting the sun (Years, Months, Weeks, Days, Hours, Minutes, Seconds). A more accurate definition of Time is: Mass Expanding and Orbiting (very important to understand that Expansion and Orbit are ONE) past stationary Light particles.
A monumental law in True and Pure Physics that Albert Einstein did not realize is that equations that are not reduced to their smallest possible factors will always contain and enable an equal yet inverse half-correct solution.
Gravock
Deleted.
Gravock
Is the paper "Evidence for an Invalidity of the Principle of Relativity" available somewhere? It is no longer avialable on the website of the journal, but maybe there is a copy somewhere?
I have it downloaded. See the attachment.
Thank you for making it available, I'm gonna read it soon!